Paragraph

 1 5 | individual ox.~It is, then, with good reason that of all that
 2 5 |          belongs. This law holds good in all cases.~It is a common
 3 5 |       can the same one action be good and bad: this law holds
 4 5 |          and bad: this law holds good with everything that is
 5 5 |        another cold, at one time good, at another bad. This capacity
 6 5 |           and that which was bad good, by a process of change;
 7 6 |    position for each. This holds good also in the case of speech.
 8 8 |         for example, we call men good boxers or runners, or healthy
 9 8 |         kind. Persons are called good boxers or good runners,
10 8 |        are called good boxers or good runners, not in virtue of
11 10|         contraries by "bad" and "good". Opposites in the sense
12 10|        the one to the other. The good is not spoken of as the
13 10|          is not spoken of as the good of the had, but as the contrary
14 10|      that everything that may be good or bad must be either good
15 10|       good or bad must be either good or bad. These pairs of contraries
16 10|         the intermediate between good and bad is that which is
17 10|         of that which is neither good nor bad, neither just nor
18 10|       aforesaid statements holds good. For it is not necessary
19 10|         cold, hot, that which is good, bad, that which is bad,
20 10|          bad, that which is bad, good. The bad man, if he is being
21 10|    negation, that the rule holds good, that one of the pair must
22 11|        11~That the contrary of a good is an evil is shown by induction:
23 11|        of an evil is sometimes a good, sometimes an evil. For
24 11|         and the mean. which is a good, is equally the contrary
25 11|         contrary of an evil is a good.~In the case of contraries,
26 11|           virtue and vice; while good and evil do not belong to