Paragraph

 1 7 |    word like "ruddered" as the correlative of "rudder". If we express
 2 7 |      accurately defined as the correlative of that which is "headed",
 3 7 |       properly defined, have a correlative. I add this condition because,
 4 7 |       name which expresses the correlative notion, but by one of irrelevant
 5 7 |        one thing is said to be correlative with another, and the terminology
 6 7 |     was correctly stated to be correlative with that other, the stated
 7 7 |       will still exist. If the correlative of "the slave" is said to
 8 7 |      which it was stated to be correlative, the stated correlation
 9 7 |   disappeared.~For suppose the correlative of "the slave" should be
10 7 |        to be "the man", or the correlative of "the wing” the bird";
11 7 | relative; for if the so-called correlative is not winged, it follows
12 7 | follows that "the wing" has no correlative.~Thus it is essential that
13 7 |        knowledge which was its correlative, the converse of this is
14 10|     and that with which it was correlative. But this is not the case.