Paragraph

 1 10| privatives" and "positives" are "blindness" and "sight"; in the sense
 2 10|         subject. Thus, sight and blindness have reference to the eye.
 3 10|         Sight" is a "positive", "blindness" a "privative", but "to
 4 10|     blind" is not equivalent to "blindness". Blindness is a "privative",
 5 10|       equivalent to "blindness". Blindness is a "privative", to be
 6 10|        privative". Moreover, if "blindness" were equivalent to "being
 7 10|        is by no means said to be blindness.~To be in a state of "possession"
 8 10|          both cases; for just as blindness is opposed to sight, so
 9 10|     other; sight is not sight of blindness, nor is any other preposition
10 10|          the relation. Similarly blindness is not said to be blindness
11 10|      blindness is not said to be blindness of sight, but rather, privation
12 10|        moreover, reciprocate; if blindness, therefore, were a relative,
13 10|          not called the sight of blindness.~That those terms which
14 10| privatives" such as "sight" and "blindness". In short, where there