Paragraph

 1 10|             iii) as privatives to positives, (iv) as affirmatives to
 2 10|        sense of "privatives" and "positives" are "blindness" and "sight";
 3 10|            iii) "privatives" and "Positives" have reference to the same
 4 10|          of "privation", just as "positives" and "privatives" themselves
 5 10|      sitting.~It is evident that "positives" and "privatives" are not
 6 10|          fall under the heads of "positives" and "privatives" are not
 7 10|          present.~In the case of "positives" and "privatives", on the
 8 10|         be blind or to see. Thus "positives" and "privatives" do not
 9 10|            therefore, plain that "positives" and "privatives" are not
10 10|          of time. In the case of "positives" and "privatives", however,
11 10| correlatives, nor in the case of "positives" and "privatives", is it
12 10|           course, with regard to "positives" and "privatives" such as "
13 10|           at all.~In the case of "positives" and "privatives", if the