Paragraph

  1 1 |      differs for each. Thus, a real man and a figure in a picture
  2 1 |            to the name in common. A man and an ox are both "animal",
  3 1 |             in both cases: for if a man should state in what sense
  4 1 |        grammar", and the courageous man from the word "courage".~
  5 2 |            such expressions as "the man runs", "the man wins"; of
  6 2 |             as "the man runs", "the man wins"; of the former "man", "
  7 2 |           man wins"; of the former "man", "ox", "runs", "wins".~
  8 2 |         present in a subject. Thus "man" is predicable of the individual
  9 2 |        predicable of the individual man, and is never present in
 10 2 |              such as the individual man or the individual horse.
 11 3 |         also of the subject. Thus, "man" is predicated of the individual
 12 3 |        predicated of the individual man; but "animal" is predicated
 13 3 |           animal" is predicated of "man"; it will, therefore, be
 14 3 |        predicable of the individual man also: for the individual
 15 3 |            also: for the individual man is both "man" and "animal".~
 16 3 |             individual man is both "man" and "animal".~If genera
 17 4 |          examples of substance are "man" or "the horse", of quantity,
 18 4 |          any way composite such as "man", "white", "runs", "wins",
 19 5 |            instance, the individual man or horse. But in a secondary
 20 5 |            instance, the individual man is included in the species "
 21 5 |            included in the species "man", and the genus to which
 22 5 |             is to say, the species "man" and the genus "animal,-
 23 5 |             subject. For instance, "man" is predicted of the individual
 24 5 |         predicted of the individual man. Now in this case the name
 25 5 |             the name of the species man" is applied to the individual,
 26 5 |    individual, for we use the term "man" in describing the individual;
 27 5 |              and the definition of "man" will also be predicated
 28 5 |        predicated of the individual man, for the individual man
 29 5 |             man, for the individual man is both man and animal.
 30 5 |          the individual man is both man and animal. Thus, both the
 31 5 |          predicated of the species "man", therefore of the individual
 32 5 |         therefore of the individual man, for if there were no individual
 33 5 |            there were no individual man of whom it could be predicated,
 34 5 |          predicated of the species "man" at all. Again, colour is
 35 5 |            account of an individual man by stating that he was man
 36 5 |          man by stating that he was man than by stating that he
 37 5 |             too general. Again, the man who gives an account of
 38 5 |           account of the individual man by stating the species to
 39 5 |         than another; an individual man is not more truly substance
 40 5 | appropriately define any individual man; and we shall make our definition
 41 5 |            If we call an individual man "skilled in grammar", the
 42 5 |          present in a subject. For "man" is predicated of the individual
 43 5 |        predicated of the individual man, but is not present in any
 44 5 |           present in the individual man. In the same way, "animal"
 45 5 |        predicated of the individual man, but is not present in him.
 46 5 |         reference to the individual man. Thus substance cannot be
 47 5 |          predicated of the species "man", but not present in it.
 48 5 |             it. For they are not in man. Moreover, the definition
 49 5 |          predicated of the species "man", the definition also of
 50 5 |           predicate of the species "man": for "man" is terrestrial.~
 51 5 |             the species "man": for "man" is terrestrial.~The fact
 52 5 |            speak, for instance, of "man" or "animal", our form of
 53 5 |            substance is; the words "man", "animal", are predicable
 54 5 |          than he who uses the word "man".~Another mark of substance
 55 5 |              such as the individual man or animal? It has none.
 56 5 |              or of any such term. A man may contend that "much"
 57 5 |          one particular substance, "man", cannot be more or less
 58 5 |              cannot be more or less man either than himself at some
 59 5 |             time or than some other man. One man cannot be more
 60 5 |            than some other man. One man cannot be more man than
 61 5 |              One man cannot be more man than another, as that which
 62 5 |            less that which it is: a man is not more truly a man
 63 5 |             man is not more truly a man at one time than he was
 64 5 |             it does so.~If, then, a man should make this exception
 65 6 |           of any such quantities. A man might, indeed, argue that "
 66 6 |          little". And even though a man should call these terms
 67 7 |             accurately stated. If a man states that a wing is necessarily
 68 7 |           not to a master, but to a man, or a biped, or anything
 69 7 |           should be said to be "the man", or the correlative of "
 70 7 |              be withdrawn from" the man", the correlation between "
 71 7 |            correlation between "the man" and "the slave" will cease
 72 7 |          cease to exist, for if the man is not a master, the slave
 73 7 |            relative. The individual man or ox is not defined with
 74 7 |            substances; the species "man" and the species "ox" are
 75 7 |         this it is plain that, if a man definitely apprehends a
 76 7 |           is self-evident: for if a man knows that some particular
 77 7 |          particular instances. If a man knows definitely that such
 78 7 |        therefore, evident that if a man apprehends some relative
 79 8 |             are dispositions. For a man is disposed in one way or
 80 8 |       because of affections. When a man is ashamed, he blushes;
 81 8 |           true is this, that when a man is by nature liable to such
 82 8 |              might be a result of a man’s natural temperament, so
 83 8 |            such virtue of them. The man who blushes through shame
 84 8 |  constitutional blusher, nor is the man who becomes pale through
 85 8 |            That temper with which a man is born and which has its
 86 8 |           qualities. Suppose that a man is irritable when vexed:
 87 8 |         spoken of as a bad-tempered man, when in such circumstances
 88 8 |           For instance, the upright man takes his character from
 89 8 |          they possess them; for one man is said to be better versed
 90 10|            again, are predicated of man, and of many other things,
 91 10|          same subject; but though a man is said to be blind, he
 92 10|         which is bad, good. The bad man, if he is being brought
 93 10|          very great progress; for a man becomes more and more easily
 94 10|        privation to possession. The man who has become blind does
 95 10|           not regain his sight; the man who has become bald does
 96 10|            not regain his hair; the man who has lost his teeth does
 97 12|          The fact of the being of a man carries with it the truth
 98 12|             is reciprocal: for if a man is, the proposition wherein
 99 12|           cause of the being of the man, but the fact of the man’
100 12|            man, but the fact of the man’s being does seem somehow
101 12|          depends on the fact of the man’s being or not being.~Thus
102 15|          instance, in the case of a man’s height; for he is said
103 15|           with regard to apparel, a man being said to "have" a coat
104 15|         have" a house or a field. A man is also said to "have" a