Book, Paragraph

  1 III, 1  |           the first principles of substance, or also the principles
  2 III, 1  |    science in question deals with substance, whether one science deals
  3 III, 1  |         of something else but the substance of existing things, or this
  4 III, 1  |      figures and points a kind of substance or not, and if they are
  5 III, 2  |         knowledge, the science of substance must be of the nature of
  6 III, 2  |           deals with them as with substance, or a different science,
  7 III, 2  |     axioms.~But if the science of substance and the science which deals
  8 III, 2  |           latter, to what sort of substance is the present science to
  9 III, 2  |       instance, if the solid is a substance and so are lines and planes,
 10 III, 2  |          the same, the science of substance also must be a demonstrative
 11 III, 2  |    investigates the attributes of substance? This is a very difficult
 12 III, 4  |      fortiori reasonable that the substance or essence, that which the
 13 III, 4  |            Besides this, will the substance of all the individuals,
 14 III, 4  |          for all the things whose substance is one are one. But are
 15 III, 4  |         the other universals is a substance; for these are most universal
 16 III, 4  |        Further, if unity is not a substance, evidently number also will
 17 III, 4  |           and being must be their substance; for it is not something
 18 III, 4  |        For whether unity is not a substance or there is a unity-itself,
 19 III, 4  |  unity-itself, number cannot be a substance. We have already said why
 20 III, 4  |         follows if unity is not a substance; and if it is, the same
 21 III, 5  |          not seem to indicate the substance of anything; for all are
 22 III, 5  |           most of all to indicate substance, water and earth and fire
 23 III, 5  |           something real and as a substance. But, on the other hand,
 24 III, 5  |          body is surely less of a substance than the surface, and the
 25 III, 5  |           among them thought that substance and being were identical
 26 III, 5  |            then, if these are not substance, there is no substance and
 27 III, 5  |        not substance, there is no substance and no being at all; for
 28 III, 5  |         that lines and points are substance more than bodies, but we
 29 III, 5  |          bodies), there can be no substance.-Further, these are all
 30 III, 5  |          is in the highest degree substance, and on the other hand these
 31 III, 5  |         are not even instances of substance, it baffles us to say what
 32 III, 5  |        what being is and what the substance of things is.-For besides
 33 III, 5  |         further paradoxes. For if substance, not having existed before,
 34 III, 5  |      which shows that it is not a substance. And evidently the same
 35 III, 6  |           to be, there will be no substance which is one in number,
 36 III, 6  |    because each of the Forms is a substance and none is by accident.~
 37 III, 6  |           this" but a "such", but substance is a "this". And if we are
 38  IV, 2  |    because they are affections of substance, others because they are
 39  IV, 2  |        they are a process towards substance, or destructions or privations
 40  IV, 2  |        privations or qualities of substance, or productive or generative
 41  IV, 2  |       productive or generative of substance, or of things which are
 42  IV, 2  |      things which are relative to substance, or negations of one of
 43  IV, 2  |          of one of these thing of substance itself. It is for this reason
 44  IV, 2  |          names. If, then, this is substance, it will be of substances
 45  IV, 2  |       being; and if, further, the substance of each thing is one in
 46  IV, 2  |  philosophy as there are kinds of substance, so that there must necessarily
 47  IV, 2  |      these concepts as well as of substance (this was one of the questions
 48  IV, 2  |            but by forgetting that substance, of which they have no correct
 49  IV, 2  |     thinkers agree that being and substance are composed of contraries;
 50  IV, 3  |           called axioms, and into substance. Evidently, the inquiry
 51  IV, 3  |  universal and deals with primary substance. Physics also is a kind
 52  IV, 3  |        studying the nature of all substance, to inquire also into the
 53  IV, 4  |         who say this do away with substance and essence. For they must
 54  IV, 4  |           meant, and this was the substance of something. And denoting
 55  IV, 4  |       something. And denoting the substance of a thing means that the
 56  IV, 4  |           the distinction between substance and accident-"white" is
 57  IV, 4  |           something which denotes substance. And if this is so, it has
 58  IV, 5  |           is also another kind of substance to which neither movement
 59  IV, 5  |          Tis one thing thinks-the substance of their limbs:~For that
 60   V, 6  |         they are accidents of one substance, "what is musical and Coriscus"
 61   V, 6  |     accident of man, which is one substance, or because both are accidents
 62   V, 6  |         genus and included in his substance, the other as a state or
 63   V, 6  |         state or affection of the substance.~The things, then, that
 64   V, 6  |        called one are those whose substance is one,-and one either in
 65   V, 8  |                        8~We call "substance" (1) the simple bodies,
 66   V, 8  |       these. All these are called substance because they are not predicated
 67   V, 8  |    definition, is also called the substance of each thing.~It follows,
 68   V, 8  |           It follows, then, that "substance" has two senses, (A) ultimate
 69   V, 10 |       have a contrariety in their substance; and contraries are other
 70   V, 10 |           which being in the same substance have a difference. "The
 71   V, 11 |          in respect of nature and substance, i.e. those which can be
 72   V, 11 |         subject is prior, so that substance is prior; secondly, according
 73   V, 11 |        the matter to the concrete substance, but in complete reality
 74   V, 13 |        and states of this kind of substance, e.g. much and little, long
 75   V, 15 |         things are the same whose substance is one; those are like whose
 76   V, 16 |       thing is complete and every substance is complete, when in respect
 77   V, 17 |         the final cause); (4) the substance of each thing, and the essence
 78   V, 18 |         meanings:-(1) the form or substance of each thing, e.g. that
 79   V, 24 |         bronze; for the composite substance comes from the sensible
 80  VI, 1  |        yields no demonstration of substance or of the essence, but some
 81  VI, 1  |       being, i.e. to that sort of substance which has the principle
 82  VI, 1  |        answer that if there is no substance other than those which are
 83  VI, 1  |          if there is an immovable substance, the science of this must
 84 VII, 1  |        what", which indicates the substance of the thing. For when we
 85 VII, 1  |           of being separated from substance, but rather, if anything,
 86 VII, 1  |          underlies them (i.e. the substance or individual), which is
 87 VII, 1  |    without qualification, must be substance.~Now there are several senses
 88 VII, 1  |          is said to be first; yet substance is first in every sense - (
 89 VII, 1  |           independently, but only substance. And (1) in definition also
 90 VII, 1  |        term the definition of its substance must be present. And (2)
 91 VII, 1  |        just the question, what is substance? For it is this that some
 92 VII, 2  |                                 2~Substance is thought to belong most
 93 VII, 2  |         as a third kind, viz. the substance of sensible bodies. And
 94 VII, 2  |          made still more kinds of substance, beginning with the One,
 95 VII, 2  |       principles for each kind of substance, one for numbers, another
 96 VII, 2  |           multiplies the kinds of substance. And some say Forms and
 97 VII, 2  |       planes-until we come to the substance of the material universe
 98 VII, 2  |            and whether there is a substance capable of separate existence (
 99 VII, 2  |           why and how) or no such substance, apart from sensible substances;
100 VII, 2  |        first sketch the nature of substance.~
101 VII, 3  |                       3~The word "substance" is applied, if not in more
102 VII, 3  |      genus, are thought to be the substance of each thing, and fourthly
103 VII, 3  |           in the truest sense its substance. And in one sense matter
104 VII, 3  |        now outlined the nature of substance, showing that it is that
105 VII, 3  |         this view, matter becomes substance. For if this is not substance,
106 VII, 3  |     substance. For if this is not substance, it baffles us to say what
107 VII, 3  |           for a quantity is not a substance), but the substance is rather
108 VII, 3  |         not a substance), but the substance is rather that to which
109 VII, 3  |      matter alone must seem to be substance. By matter I mean that which
110 VII, 3  |         the predicates other than substance are predicated of substance,
111 VII, 3  |       substance are predicated of substance, while substance is predicated
112 VII, 3  |    predicated of substance, while substance is predicated of matter).
113 VII, 3  |         it follows that matter is substance. But this is impossible;
114 VII, 3  |      thought to belong chiefly to substance. And so form and the compound
115 VII, 3  |     matter would be thought to be substance, rather than matter. The
116 VII, 3  |           rather than matter. The substance compounded of both, i.e.
117 VII, 3  |    inquire into the third kind of substance; for this is the most perplexing.~
118 VII, 4  |       marks by which we determine substance, and one of these was thought
119 VII, 4  |      thing is" in one sense means substance and the "this", in another
120 VII, 4  |    belongs in the simple sense to substance, but in a limited sense
121 VII, 4  |        and in the simple sense to substance, and in a secondary way
122 VII, 4  |           either of white or of a substance.~
123 VII, 5  |     involved.~Clearly, then, only substance is definable. For if the
124 VII, 6  |        for the inquiry concerning substance; for each thing is thought
125 VII, 6  |         be not different from its substance, and the essence is said
126 VII, 6  |         essence is said to be the substance of each thing.~Now in the
127 VII, 6  |         substances, if essence is substance. And if the posterior substances
128 VII, 6  |         not be substratum that is substance; for these must be substances,
129 VII, 6  |           start, since essence is substance? But indeed not only are
130 VII, 7  |        each thing and its primary substance.) For even contraries have
131 VII, 7  |      sense the same form; for the substance of a privation is the opposite
132 VII, 7  |         privation is the opposite substance, e.g. health is the substance
133 VII, 7  |     substance, e.g. health is the substance of disease (for disease
134 VII, 7  |        house, and when I speak of substance without matter I mean the
135 VII, 8  |           is spoken of as form or substance is not produced, but the
136 VII, 9  |      Therefore, as in syllogisms, substance is the starting-point of
137 VII, 9  |            But not only regarding substance does our argument prove
138 VII, 9  |         is it both in the case of substance and in that of quality and
139 VII, 9  |        instances a peculiarity of substance, that there must exist beforehand
140 VII, 9  |          complete reality another substance which produces it, e.g.
141 VII, 10 |          about the parts of which substance consists. If then matter
142 VII, 10 |         form and the compound are substance even the matter is in a
143 VII, 10 |           the formula, and of the substance according to its formula,
144 VII, 10 |          animals (for this is the substance of a living being) is their
145 VII, 10 |          a living being) is their substance according to the formula,
146 VII, 10 |  posterior to this, the essential substance, and it is not the substance
147 VII, 10 |      substance, and it is not the substance but the concrete thing that
148 VII, 10 |       formula, i.e. the essential substance, is immediately present,
149 VII, 10 |          but universally, are not substance but something composed of
150 VII, 11 |           the soul is the primary substance and the body is matter,
151 VII, 11 |          one should look for some substance other than these, e.g. numbers
152 VII, 11 |        matter, but also about the substance expressed in the formula,
153 VII, 11 |        that in the formula of the substance the material parts will
154 VII, 11 |         are not even parts of the substance in that sense, but of the
155 VII, 11 |        sense, but of the concrete substance; but of this there is in
156 VII, 11 |           of the soul - , for the substance is the indwelling form,
157 VII, 11 |     matter the so-called concrete substance is derived; e.g. concavity
158 VII, 11 |   snubness"); but in the concrete substance, e.g. a snub nose or Callias,
159 VII, 11 |          primary. (By a "primary" substance I mean one which does not
160 VII, 12 |          our inquiries concerning substance. I mean this problem:-wherein
161 VII, 12 |          formula and a formula of substance, so that it must be a formula
162 VII, 12 |    formula of some one thing; for substance means a "one" and a "this",
163 VII, 12 |           differentia will be the substance of the thing and its definition,
164 VII, 12 |     last-will be the form and the substance; but if we divide according
165 VII, 12 |          there is no order in the substance; for how are we to think
166 VII, 13 |          of our inquiry, which is substance. As the substratum and the
167 VII, 13 |      compound of these are called substance, so also is the universal.
168 VII, 13 |           should be the name of a substance. For firstly the substance
169 VII, 13 |        substance. For firstly the substance of each thing is that which
170 VII, 13 |  individual then will this be the substance? Either of all or of none;
171 VII, 13 |        none; but it cannot be the substance of all. And if it is to
172 VII, 13 |            And if it is to be the substance of one, this one will be
173 VII, 13 |     others also; for things whose substance is one and whose essence
174 VII, 13 |     themselves also one.~Further, substance means that which is not
175 VII, 13 |     universal, while it cannot be substance in the way in which the
176 VII, 13 |         everything that is in the substance; for none the less the universal
177 VII, 13 |         the universal will be the substance of something, as "man" is
178 VII, 13 |        something, as "man" is the substance of the individual man in
179 VII, 13 |        e.g. "animal", will be the substance of that in which it is present
180 VII, 13 |         that the "this", i.e. the substance, if it consists of parts,
181 VII, 13 |    quality; for that which is not substance, i.e. the quality, will
182 VII, 13 |    quality, will then be prior to substance and to the "this". Which
183 VII, 13 |     modifications be prior to the substance; for then they will also
184 VII, 13 |           Socrates will contain a substance present in a substance,
185 VII, 13 |          a substance present in a substance, so that this will be the
186 VII, 13 |          so that this will be the substance of two things. And in general
187 VII, 13 |           man and such things are substance, that none of the elements
188 VII, 13 |          in their formulae is the substance of anything, nor does it
189 VII, 13 |          universal attribute is a substance, and this is plain also
190 VII, 13 |        following consideration. A substance cannot consist of substances
191 VII, 13 |        another); therefore if the substance is one, it will not consist
192 VII, 13 |      involves a difficulty. If no substance can consist of universals
193 VII, 13 |           not a "this", and if no substance can be composed of substances
194 VII, 13 |           complete reality, every substance would be incomposite, so
195 VII, 13 |          even be a formula of any substance. But it is thought by all
196 VII, 13 |        either only, or primarily, substance that can defined; yet now
197 VII, 13 |        now it seems that not even substance can. There cannot, then,
198 VII, 14 |   infinite number of things whose substance is animal’; for it is not
199 VII, 14 |          each species will be the substance of the species; for it is
200 VII, 14 |         Idea of one thing and the substance of another; this is impossible.
201 VII, 15 |                          15~Since substance is of two kinds, the concrete
202 VII, 15 |           I mean that one kind of substance is the formula taken with
203 VII, 15 |          the sun" means a certain substance); but also by the mention
204 VII, 16 |         the term "being", and the substance of that which is one is
205 VII, 16 |          is one, and things whose substance is numerically one are numerically
206 VII, 16 |        unity nor being can be the substance of things, just as being
207 VII, 16 |           principle cannot be the substance, but we ask what, then,
208 VII, 16 |           not even the former are substance, since in general nothing
209 VII, 16 |         nothing that is common is substance; for substance does not
210 VII, 16 |          common is substance; for substance does not belong to anything
211 VII, 16 |        has it, of which it is the substance. Further, that which is
212 VII, 16 |          things (for this kind of substance we know)—’man-himself’ and "
213 VII, 16 |   universal term is the name of a substance, and no substance is composed
214 VII, 16 |       name of a substance, and no substance is composed of substances.~
215 VII, 17 |          i.e. what kind of thing, substance should be said to be, taking
216 VII, 17 |           clear view also of that substance which exists apart from
217 VII, 17 |          substances. Since, then, substance is a principle and a cause,
218 VII, 17 |   definite thing; and this is the substance of the thing. Evidently,
219 VII, 17 |      other cases. And this is the substance of each thing (for this
220 VII, 17 |          process of nature, their substance would seem to be this kind
221 VIII, 1 |          And since the essence is substance, and the definition is a
222 VIII, 1 |             what are parts of the substance and what are not, and whether
223 VIII, 1 |          whether the parts of the substance are also parts of the definition.
224 VIII, 1 |      universal nor the genus is a substance; we must inquire later into
225 VIII, 1 |         matter. The substratum is substance, and this is in one sense
226 VIII, 1 |        But clearly matter also is substance; for in all the opposite
227 VIII, 1 |           similarly in respect of substance there is something that
228 VIII, 2 |                       2~Since the substance which exists as underlying
229 VIII, 2 |         for us to say what is the substance, in the sense of actuality,
230 VIII, 2 |       these facts that, since its substance is the cause of each thing’
231 VIII, 2 |          of these differentiae is substance, even when coupled with
232 VIII, 2 |           is what is analogous to substance in each case; and as in
233 VIII, 2 |        speak of the third kind of substance, which is composed of matter
234 VIII, 2 |       motion is the actuality and substance. What is a calm? Smoothness
235 VIII, 2 |          been said, what sensible substance is and how it exists-one
236 VIII, 3 |          name means the composite substance, or the actuality or form,
237 VIII, 3 |          a soul"; for soul is the substance or actuality of some body. "
238 VIII, 3 |         the inquiry into sensible substance; for the essence certainly
239 VIII, 3 |        nor a compound, but is the substance; but this people eliminate,
240 VIII, 3 |         cause of its being is its substance, they will not be stating
241 VIII, 3 |           will not be stating the substance itself.~(This, then, must
242 VIII, 3 |       natural objects is the only substance to be found in destructible
243 VIII, 3 |        tin. Therefore one kind of substance can be defined and formulated,
244 VIII, 3 |         reason is applicable, and substance is one in the sense which
245 VIII, 3 |        and the less, neither does substance, in the sense of form, but
246 VIII, 3 |         sense of form, but if any substance does, it is only the substance
247 VIII, 3 |    substance does, it is only the substance which involves matter. Let
248 VIII, 4 |              4~Regarding material substance we must not forget that
249 VIII, 4 |           their substratum is the substance. E.g what is the cause of
250 VIII, 6 |          kind of being-individual substance, quality, or quantity (and
251  IX, 1  |        being are referred-i.e. of substance. For it is in virtue of
252  IX, 1  |          virtue of the concept of substance that the others also are
253  IX, 1  |         to involve the concept of substance, as we said in the first
254  IX, 6  |        potency, and the others as substance to some sort of matter.~
255  IX, 7  |         the ultimate subject is a substance; but when this is not so
256  IX, 7  |    subject is matter and material substance. And it is only right that "
257  IX, 8  |       have said in our account of substance that everything that is
258  IX, 8  |         Obviously, therefore, the substance or form is actuality. According
259  IX, 8  |       eternal things are prior in substance to perishable things, and
260  IX, 8  |       sense" means "in respect of substance". Nothing, then, which is
261  IX, 8  |            for it is that kind of substance which is matter and potency,
262   X, 1  |          know the elements in the substance by dividing the things either
263   X, 2  |              2~With regard to the substance and nature of the one we
264   X, 2  |         the one itself as being a substance (as both the Pythagoreans
265   X, 2  |       then, no universal can be a substance, as has been said our discussion
266   X, 2  |       been said our discussion of substance and being, and if being
267   X, 2  |          being itself cannot be a substance in the sense of a one apart
268   X, 2  |    clearly unity also cannot be a substance; for being and unity are
269   X, 2  |       reasons for which being and substance cannot be genera.~Further,
270   X, 2  |         have been something whose substance was not to be one but to
271   X, 2  |         is one something, and its substance is not just to be one, the
272   X, 2  |          is one colour, so too in substance the one-itself is one substance.
273   X, 2  |   substance the one-itself is one substance. That in a sense unity means
274   X, 2  |       being is nothing apart from substance or quality or quantity);
275   X, 3  |         respect of their concrete substance, they are the same in form;
276  XI, 2  |         that there is a separable substance besides the sensible substances (
277  XI, 2  |           to seek another kind of substance, and this is our problem,
278  XI, 2  |      Further, if there is another substance apart from and corresponding
279  XI, 2  |           which kinds of sensible substance must be supposed to have
280  XI, 2  |          that there is no eternal substance at all which can exist apart
281  XI, 2  |          for such a principle and substance seems to exist and is sought
282  XI, 2  |            Further, if there is a substance or principle of such a nature
283  XI, 2  |          not indicate a "this" or substance, how will they be separable
284  XI, 2  |          does signify a "this" or substance, all things that are are
285  XI, 2  |           all things that are are substance is false. Further, how can
286  XI, 2  |    principle is unity and this is substance, and generate number as
287  XI, 2  |     matter, assert that number is substance? How are we to think of "
288  XI, 2  |           suppose that there is a substance of unity and the point?
289  XI, 2  |        unity and the point? Every substance comes into being by a gradual
290  XI, 2  | universals and of the "such", but substance is not a universal, but
291  XI, 2  |         the first principle to be substance?~Further, is there anything
292  XI, 7  |          no demonstration. of the substance or "what".~There is a science
293  XI, 7  |           of these, if there is a substance of this nature (I mean separable
294  XI, 7  |       there is another entity and substance, separable and unmovable,
295  XI, 10 |        but infinity itself is its substance and not an accident of it,
296  XI, 10 |          same, if the infinite is substance and not predicated of a
297  XI, 10 |      infinite, if the infinite is substance and a principle). Therefore
298  XI, 12 |      categories are classified as substance, quality, place, acting
299  XI, 12 |         no movement in respect of substance (because there is nothing
300  XI, 12 |      there is nothing contrary to substance), nor of relation (for it
301  XI, 12 |         is not movement either of substance or of relation or of activity
302  XI, 12 |          not that which is in the substance (for even the differentia
303 XII, 1  |         subject of our inquiry is substance; for the principles and
304 XII, 1  |         of the nature of a whole, substance is its first part; and if
305 XII, 1  |     succession, on this view also substance is first, and is succeeded
306 XII, 1  |         the categories other than substance can exist apart. And the
307 XII, 1  |         testify to the primacy of substance; for it was of substance
308 XII, 1  |          substance; for it was of substance that they sought the principles
309 XII, 1  |           The former two kinds of substance are the subject of physics (
310 XII, 2  |                        2~Sensible substance is changeable. Now if change
311 XII, 3  |       stop.~Note, next, that each substance comes into being out of
312 XII, 3  |        which is in the full sense substance); the nature, which is a "
313 XII, 3  |           thirdly, the particular substance which is composed of these
314 XII, 3  |          apart from the composite substance, e.g. the form of house
315 XII, 4  |       common to and distinct from substance and the other categories,
316 XII, 4  |         an element. But again (b) substance is not an element in relative
317 XII, 4  |        any of these an element in substance. Further, (2) how can all
318 XII, 4  |            then, will be either a substance or a relative term; but
319 XII, 4  |         rest is a principle and a substance. Therefore analogically
320 XII, 6  |         there were three kinds of substance, two of them physical and
321 XII, 6  |           be an eternal unmovable substance. For substances are the
322 XII, 6  |        not enough, nor is another substance besides the Forms enough;
323 XII, 7  |       being moved, being eternal, substance, and actuality. And the
324 XII, 7  |          of thought; and in this, substance is first, and in substance,
325 XII, 7  |        substance is first, and in substance, that which is simple and
326 XII, 7  |          in place, even if not in substance. But since there is something
327 XII, 7  |         been said that there is a substance which is eternal and unmovable
328 XII, 7  |         been shown also that this substance cannot have any magnitude,
329 XII, 8  |          have to suppose one such substance or more than one, and if
330 XII, 8  |           the first and unmovable substance produces, there are other
331 XII, 8  |          also must be caused by a substance both unmovable in itself
332 XII, 8  |           it is a certain kind of substance, and the mover is eternal
333 XII, 8  |          that which is prior to a substance must be a substance. Evidently,
334 XII, 8  |          to a substance must be a substance. Evidently, then, there
335 XII, 8  |          science speculates about substance which is perceptible but
336 XII, 8  |         and geometry, treat of no substance. That the movements are
337 XII, 8  |     further every being and every substance which is immune from change
338 XII, 9  |           since that which is its substance is not the act of thinking,
339 XII, 9  |    potency) it cannot be the best substance; for it is through thinking
340 XII, 9  |          it. Further, whether its substance is the faculty of thought
341 XII, 9  |     productive sciences it is the substance or essence of the object,
342 XII, 10 |           to generate one kind of substance after another and give different
343 XII, 10 |     principles for each, make the substance of the universe a mere series
344 XII, 10 |       series of episodes (for one substance has no influence on another
345 XIII, 1 |           have stated what is the substance of sensible things, dealing
346 XIII, 1 |        matter, and later with the substance which has actual existence.
347 XIII, 2 |         have another intermediate substance separate both from the Ideas
348 XIII, 2 |         from the intermediates,-a substance which is neither number
349 XIII, 2 |        prior, but in the order of substance posterior, as the lifeless
350 XIII, 2 |            the solid is a sort of substance; for it already has in a
351 XIII, 2 |           been a sort of material substance, we should have observed
352 XIII, 4 |     sciences of other things than substance; and a thousand other such
353 XIII, 4 |       Therefore the Forms will be substance. But the same names indicate
354 XIII, 4 |           the same names indicate substance in this and in the ideal
355 XIII, 5 |         for they are not even the substance of these, else they would
356 XIII, 5 |        would seem impossible that substance and that whose substance
357 XIII, 5 |          substance and that whose substance it is should exist apart;
358 XIII, 6 |       number is an entity and its substance is nothing other than just
359 XIII, 6 |        the 1 is the beginning and substance and element of all things,
360 XIII, 8 |    respect of the form and of the substance as expressed in the definition,
361 XIII, 8 |       universal is one as form or substance, while the element is one
362 XIII, 9 |         who discuss only sensible substance have been partly stated
363 XIII, 10|        separate, we shall destroy substance in the sense in which we
364 XIII, 10|           in which we understand "substance"; but if we conceive substances
365 XIII, 10|    non-substance will be prior to substance; for the universal is not
366 XIII, 10|        for the universal is not a substance, but the element or principle
367 XIII, 10|        separate existence-i.e. no substance. But evidently in a sense
368 XIV, 1  |          1~REGARDING this kind of substance, what we have said must
369 XIV, 1  |      there is nothing contrary to substance, argument confirms this.
370 XIV, 1  |          one is not in itself the substance of anything. And this is
371 XIV, 1  |        things a kind of entity or substance, and is posterior to quality
372 XIV, 1  |        relative is least of all a substance and a real thing is the
373 XIV, 1  |         locomotion, in respect of substance simple generation and destruction.
374 XIV, 1  |           thing, and therefore of substance, must be that which is potentially
375 XIV, 1  |          potentially nor actually substance. It is strange, then, or
376 XIV, 1  |         element in, and prior to, substance; for all the categories
377 XIV, 1  |       categories are posterior to substance. Again, (d) elements are
378 XIV, 2  |          true universally-that no substance is eternal unless it is
379 XIV, 2  |         are matter that underlies substance, no eternal substance can
380 XIV, 2  |   underlies substance, no eternal substance can have elements present
381 XIV, 2  |            for it means sometimes substance, sometimes that it is of
382 XIV, 2  |         means not being a certain substance, "not being straight" not
383 XIV, 2  |        potentially a "this" and a substance but is not in itself being-viz.
384 XIV, 2  |         the categories other than substance there is yet another problem
385 XIV, 3  |       this will be a "this" and a substance. But that is absurd. Not
386 XIV, 4  |      itself; but they thought its substance lay mainly in its unity.~