Book, Paragraph

  1  II, 2  |              the sources of movement form an endless series (man for
  2 III, 2  |            earth and stones, and the form is the definition. To judge
  3 III, 2  |         there are gods, but in human form. For they were positing
  4 III, 2  |      sensations intermediate between Form and individual, evidently
  5 III, 4  |             thing, viz. the shape or form.~But again (B) if we are
  6  IV, 4  |       accidental to Socrates, cannot form an infinite series in the
  7  IV, 5  |              it is in respect of its form that we know each thing.-
  8  IV, 7  |           meaning something; for the form of words of which the word
  9   V, 2  |         which include these. (2) The form or pattern, i.e. the definition
 10   V, 2  |               the synthesis, and the form). The semen, the physician,
 11   V, 4  |               unless they have their form or shape. That which comprises
 12   V, 4  |             are water), but also the form or essence, which is the
 13   V, 5  |       irksome"), and compulsion is a form of necessity, as Sophocles
 14   V, 6  |             e.g. horse, man, and dog form a unity, because all are
 15   V, 6  |              the definition of their form. In general those things
 16   V, 6  |           either in continuity or in form or in definition; for we
 17   V, 6  |           continuous, or those whose form is not one, or those whose
 18   V, 6  |          i.e. unless it has unity of form; e.g. if we saw the parts
 19   V, 6  |             already a certain single form. This is why the circle
 20   V, 8  |          this nature is the shape or form of each thing.~
 21   V, 16 |            nothing in respect of the form of their proper excellence.
 22   V, 16 |               when in respect of the form of its proper excellence
 23   V, 17 |         which every part is; (2) the form, whatever it may be, of
 24   V, 18 |            several meanings:-(1) the form or substance of each thing,
 25   V, 18 |             the primary sense is the form, and in a secondary sense
 26   V, 23 |              e.g. the bronze has the form of the statue, and the body
 27   V, 24 |              is complete.-(4) As the form from its part, e.g. man
 28   V, 24 |             sensible matter, but the form also comes from the matter
 29   V, 24 |         comes from the matter of the form.-Some things, then, are
 30   V, 25 |            whole" meaning either the form or that which has the form;
 31   V, 25 |           form or that which has the form; e.g. of the bronze sphere
 32   V, 25 |              the matter in which the form is-and the characteristic
 33   V, 26 |         things it contains that they form a unity; and this in two
 34   V, 26 |             transposition, but whose form does not, e.g. wax or a
 35   V, 28 |           things which have the same form is continuous, e.g. "while
 36   V, 28 |            into the same thing (e.g. form and matter are different
 37 VII, 3  |             shape the pattern of its form, and by the compound of
 38 VII, 3  |             whole.) Therefore if the form is prior to the matter and
 39 VII, 3  |         chiefly to substance. And so form and the compound of form
 40 VII, 3  |             form and the compound of form and matter would be thought
 41 VII, 4  |           emphasizing the linguistic form, that that is which is not
 42 VII, 7  |              the things of which the form is in the soul of the artist. (
 43 VII, 7  |              soul of the artist. (By form I mean the essence of each
 44 VII, 7  |             have in a sense the same form; for the substance of a
 45 VII, 7  |             the building art are the form of health and of the house,
 46 VII, 7  |           the starting-point and the form is thinking, and that which
 47 VII, 7  |            if it happens by art, the form in the soul, and if spontaneously,
 48 VII, 7  |          saying it is brass, and the form by saying that it is such
 49 VII, 8  |           else, i.e. to produce this form in something different from
 50 VII, 8  |           itself. For if we make the form, we must make it out of
 51 VII, 8  |         infinity. Obviously then the form also, or whatever we ought
 52 VII, 8  |             the sphere; we bring the form into this particular matter,
 53 VII, 8  |              be matter and the other form. If, then, a sphere is "
 54 VII, 8  |           that which is spoken of as form or substance is not produced,
 55 VII, 8  |              is matter and the other form.~Is there, then, a sphere
 56 VII, 8  |           had been so, but that the "form" means the "such", and is
 57 VII, 8  |            nor one in number, but in form), i.e. in the case of natural
 58 VII, 8  |              unnecessary to set up a Form as a pattern (for we should
 59 VII, 8  |            and to the causing of the form in the matter. And when
 60 VII, 8  |           the whole, such and such a form in this flesh and in these
 61 VII, 8  |          different), but the same in form; for their form is indivisible.~
 62 VII, 8  |              same in form; for their form is indivisible.~
 63 VII, 9  |           the art of building is the form of the house), or from something
 64 VII, 9  |          work by art; for it has the form potentially, and that from
 65 VII, 9  |            offspring be an imperfect form; which is the reason why
 66 VII, 9  |              argument prove that its form does not come to be, but
 67 VII, 9  |               for the matter and the form must always exist before),
 68 VII, 10 |            then matter is one thing, form another, the compound of
 69 VII, 10 |              both the matter and the form and the compound are substance
 70 VII, 10 |             which the formula of the form consists. E.g. of concavity
 71 VII, 10 |        spoken of in the sense of the form. (For the form, or the thing
 72 VII, 10 |          sense of the form. (For the form, or the thing as having
 73 VII, 10 |               or the thing as having form, should be said to be the
 74 VII, 10 |          parts of the formula of the form, and not matter, but the
 75 VII, 10 |         sense of matter on which the form supervenes; yet they are
 76 VII, 10 |              yet they are nearer the form than the bronze is when
 77 VII, 10 |           thing, but not also of the form, i.e. of that to which the
 78 VII, 10 |           Those things which are the form and the matter taken together,
 79 VII, 10 |         formulae are formulae of the form only, do not pass away,-
 80 VII, 10 |        concrete things, while of the form they are neither parts nor
 81 VII, 10 |             to the formula, i.e. the form and the essence of a body
 82 VII, 10 |              be a part either of the form (i.e. of the essence), or
 83 VII, 10 |            or of the compound of the form and the matter, or of the
 84 VII, 10 |            But only the parts of the form are parts of the formula,
 85 VII, 11 |          sort of parts belong to the form and what sort not to the
 86 VII, 11 |             and what sort not to the form, but to the concrete thing.
 87 VII, 11 |             the universal and of the form. If then it is not evident
 88 VII, 11 |              would be no part of the form; but it is hard to eliminate
 89 VII, 11 |              it in thought. E.g. the form of man is always found in
 90 VII, 11 |         these then also parts of the form and the formula? No, they
 91 VII, 11 |               and others make it the Form of the line; for in some
 92 VII, 11 |              some cases they say the Form and that of which it is
 93 VII, 11 |              that of which it is the Form are the same, e.g. "two"
 94 VII, 11 |             same, e.g. "two" and the Form of two; but in the case
 95 VII, 11 |       follows then that there is one Form for many things whose form
 96 VII, 11 |           Form for many things whose form is evidently different (
 97 VII, 11 |              surely are a particular form in a particular matter,
 98 VII, 11 |            not an essence and a bare form but a "this". The semicircles,
 99 VII, 11 |          substance is the indwelling form, from which and the matter
100 VII, 11 |         derived; e.g. concavity is a form of this sort, for from this
101 VII, 12 |               cloven-footedness is a form of footedness. And the process
102 VII, 12 |     differentia-the last-will be the form and the substance; but if
103 VII, 14 |            at the same time make the Form consist of the genus and
104 VII, 14 |          absurd.~But (2) suppose the Form to be different in each
105 VII, 16 |           say the one over many is a Form. The reason for their doing
106 VII, 17 |             is always sought in this form—’why does one thing attach
107 VII, 17 |             or this body having this form, a man? Therefore what we
108 VII, 17 |          seek is the cause, i.e. the form, by reason of which the
109 VIII, 2 |            is composed of matter and form (for the formula that gives
110 VIII, 2 |              to be an account of the form or actuality, while that
111 VIII, 2 |             accounts of the combined form and matter. E.g. what is
112 VIII, 2 |             it as matter, another as form or actuality, while the
113 VIII, 3 |       substance, or the actuality or form, e.g. whether "house" is
114 VIII, 3 |              or for the actuality or form, "a covering", and whether
115 VIII, 3 |            certainly attaches to the form and the actuality. For "
116 VIII, 3 |              one makes or begets the form, but it is the individual
117 VIII, 3 |            made, i.e. the complex of form and matter that is generated.
118 VIII, 3 |         matter and the other that of form.~It is also obvious that,
119 VIII, 3 |           substance, in the sense of form, but if any substance does,
120 VIII, 5 |           its positive state and its form, and of the other in virtue
121 VIII, 6 | participation not in man, nor in-one Form, but in two, animal and
122 VIII, 6 |             is matter and another is form, and one is potentially
123 VIII, 6 |             one is matter, the other form. What, then, causes this-that
124 VIII, 6 |             proximate matter and the form are one and the same thing,
125  IX, 7  |            so but the predicate is a form and a "this", the ultimate
126  IX, 8  |             in becoming are prior in form and in substantiality (e.g.
127  IX, 8  |              the one already has its form, and the other has not),
128  IX, 8  |           because it may come to its form; and when it exists actually,
129  IX, 8  |          actually, then it is in its form. And the same holds good
130  IX, 8  |          therefore, the substance or form is actuality. According
131  IX, 9  |              are equal the two which form the base, and the perpendicular
132  IX, 10 |          single number not even this form of error is possible; for
133   X, 1  |              has a certain shape and form is one in a still higher
134   X, 1  |      isolated either in place, or in form or thought"; or perhaps "
135   X, 1  |             to use the corresponding form of words, but the claim
136   X, 3  |            one with yourself both in form and in matter; and again, (
137   X, 3  |      substance, they are the same in form; e.g. the larger square
138   X, 3  |            like, if, having the same form, and being things in which
139   X, 3  |            have a quality that is in form one and same-e.g. whiteness-in
140   X, 3  |            called like because their form is one. Other things are
141   X, 4  |              proceed either from the form and the possession of the
142   X, 4  |            and the possession of the form or from a privation of the
143   X, 4  |              from a privation of the form or shape, clearly all contrariety
144   X, 10 |              contraries are other in form, and the perishable and
145   X, 10 |            every perishable thing in form, just as not every pale
146   X, 10 |           pale thing is different in form from every dark thing. For
147   X, 10 |           are said to be the same in form with the individuals and
148   X, 10 |           than those which differ in form.~
149  XI, 2  |           would seem rather that the form or shape is a more important
150  XI, 2  |         principle than this; but the form is perishable, so that there
151  XI, 2  |            something, it must be the form or shape. Now it is hard
152  XI, 2  |           not; for in some cases the form is evidently not separable,
153  XI, 3  |             an equivocal term do not form one genus); but if the word
154  XI, 9  |              kind of it is "positive form", and the other is "privation";
155  XI, 12 |          from change into some other form of existence (e.g. a man
156  XI, 12 |            determined by position or form or in some other way) and
157 XII, 2  |          three senses. If, then, one form of non-being exists potentially,
158 XII, 2  |          which one is definition and form and the other is privation,
159 XII, 3  |           neither the matter nor the form comes to be-and I mean the
160 XII, 3  |             mean the last matter and form. For everything that changes
161 XII, 3  |             which it is changed, the form. The process, then, will
162 XII, 3  |        composite substance, e.g. the form of house does not so exist,
163 XII, 3  |             must examine whether any form also survives afterwards.
164 XII, 4  |           perceptible bodies are, as form, the hot, and in another
165 XII, 4  |             are three principles-the form, the privation, and the
166 XII, 4  |            cause is the medical art. Form, disorder of a particular
167 XII, 4  |              products of thought the form or its contrary, there will
168 XII, 4  |              the building art is the form of the house, and man begets
169 XII, 5  |          above-named causes. For the form exists actually, if it can
170 XII, 5  |           and so does the complex of form and matter, and the privation,
171 XII, 5  |              qualified either by the form or by the privation.) But
172 XII, 5  |              some of which cases the form is not the same but different;
173 XII, 5  |             matter, and the peculiar form), and further (2) something
174 XII, 5  |         which are neither matter nor form nor privation of man nor
175 XII, 5  |           different, your matter and form and moving cause being different
176 XII, 5  |             this sense, that matter, form, privation, and the moving
177 XII, 7  |             actuality is the primary form of spatial motion, then
178 XII, 8  |         those who study this subject form an opinion contrary to what
179 XII, 8  |             have one, will be one in form but in number many. But
180 XII, 8  |        posterity a tradition, in the form of a myth, that these bodies
181 XII, 8  |              added later in mythical form with a view to the persuasion
182 XII, 8  |            say these gods are in the form of men or like some of the
183 XII, 10 |             as end or as mover or as form.~Empedocles also has a paradoxical
184 XII, 10 |           not, either as mover or as form, produce a continuum. But
185 XII, 10 |              body, or in general the form and the thing, are one-of
186 XIII, 2 |             substances? Neither as a form or shape, as the soul perhaps
187 XIII, 3 |             movement is the simplest form.~The same account may be
188 XIII, 4 |               but treating it in the form in which it was originally
189 XIII, 4 |            in incidentally, but each Form must be shared in as something
190 XIII, 4 |          share in them have the same form, there will be something
191 XIII, 4 |            if they have not the same form, they will have only the
192 XIII, 7 |           animal-itself or any other Form be? There is one Idea of
193 XIII, 7 |            been said before. For the Form is unique; but if the units
194 XIII, 7 |           Forms will be parts of one Form. And so with a view to their
195 XIII, 8 |           more of a real thing and a Form than 10 itself. There is
196 XIII, 8 |             as the universal and the form is prior, the number is
197 XIII, 8 |               and the number acts as form. And in a sense the right
198 XIII, 8 |         prior, but in respect of the form and of the substance as
199 XIII, 8 |     consisting of the matter and the form, are prior; for the concrete
200 XIII, 8 |      concrete thing is nearer to the form and to what is expressed
201 XIII, 8 |              the universal is one as form or substance, while the
202 XIII, 8 |              a whole, a unity, and a form. But (2) because they were
203 XIII, 8 |             itself is one also, both form a 2. From what, then, is
204 XIII, 10|            universal and the same in form but each is one in number
205 XIII, 10|       substances which have the same form there are Ideas, a single
206 XIV, 1  |            two being matter, one the form; while others name the many
207 XIV, 2  |            difficulty in an obsolete form. For they thought that all
208 XIV, 4  |            of it in a more undiluted form than spatial magnitudes,
209 XIV, 5  |         essence or the causes of the form; for the ratio is the essence,
210 XIV, 5  |             number the causes of the form; for the ratio is the essence,
211 XIV, 5  |            matter, nor the ratio and form of things. Nor, of course,
212 XIV, 6  |              would have had the same form of number; e.g. sun and
213 XIV, 6  |           differ from one another in form; for even the units do);