Book, Paragraph

  1  II, 1  |             as difficulties are of two kinds, the cause of the
  2  II, 2  |        thing comes from another in two ways-not in the sense in
  3  II, 3  |        easy to get even one of the two.~The minute accuracy of
  4 III, 2  |          one science, which of the two must be identified with
  5 III, 2  |         this theory that there are two solids in the same place,
  6 III, 3  |           apart from them (e.g. if two is the first of numbers,
  7 III, 4  |           the concrete thing these two elements?~(9) Again, one
  8 III, 4  |           since there could not be two or more letters of the same
  9 III, 5  |          case when they touch, and two in the other-when they are
 10 III, 5  |      indivisible, was divided into two). And if the boundaries
 11  IV, 2  |    different (it is clear that the two things are not separated
 12  IV, 2  |           of contraries one of the two columns is privative, and
 13  IV, 4  |             for not even more than two terms can be combined in
 14  IV, 4  |          nor a not-man. For to the two assertions there answer
 15  IV, 4  |            assertions there answer two negations, and if the former
 16  IV, 4  |      proposition compounded out of two, the latter also is a single
 17  IV, 4  |         for we should not say that two and three are equally even,
 18  IV, 5  |            For "that which is" has two meanings, so that in some
 19  IV, 5  |       potentially at the same time two contraries, but it cannot
 20  IV, 5  |          or all were mad, and only two or three were well or sane,
 21  IV, 6  |            and that, since we have two eyes, things may not appear
 22  IV, 6  |           for touch says there are two objects when we cross our
 23   V, 2  |         while each is spoken of in two ways; for (A) they are causes
 24   V, 4  |         matter nature (and this in two senses, either the first,
 25   V, 6  |            the same triangles.~(c) Two things are called one, when
 26   V, 6  |           not admit of it; e.g. if two things are indistinguishable
 27   V, 6  |           dimension, a plane if in two, a body if divisible in
 28   V, 6  |         that which is divisible in two dimensions is a plane, that
 29   V, 7  |        musician is pale", the last two mean that both attributes
 30   V, 8  |         then, that "substance" has two senses, (A) ultimate substratum,
 31   V, 9  |         itself; for we treat it as two.~Things are called "other"
 32   V, 9  |    attributes (each of them one of two contraries) in respect of
 33   V, 12 |       habit", "capable" is used in two distinct senses); and a
 34   V, 13 |            which is divisible into two or more constituent parts
 35   V, 13 |            dimension is length; in two breadth, in three depth.
 36   V, 14 |         these are those which have two or three factors); and in
 37   V, 14 |          seems to have practically two meanings, and one of these
 38   V, 16 |      others presuppose these first two kinds, and are called complete
 39   V, 24 |           from matter, and this in two senses, either in respect
 40   V, 25 |          called a part of it, e.g. two is called in a sense a part
 41   V, 25 |     measure the whole; this is why two, though in one sense it
 42   V, 26 |          form a unity; and this in two senses-either as being each
 43   V, 27 |         divisible. For not only is two not "mutilated" if one of
 44   V, 27 |           mutilated" if one of the two ones is taken away (for
 45   V, 27 |      number has unlike parts (e.g. two and three) as well as like;
 46   V, 29 |          sometimes; it is in these two senses that they are non-existent. (
 47   V, 29 |           use of the definition of two.~These things, then, are
 48   V, 30 |         having its angles equal to two right angles attaches to
 49  VI, 2  |          whose angles are equal to two right angles".-And this
 50 VII, 2  |           real; e.g. Plato posited two kinds of substance-the Forms
 51 VII, 4  |          reply that there are just two ways in which a predicate
 52 VII, 4  |      matter at all in which of the two ways one likes to describe
 53 VII, 5  |           is compounded out of the two by the presence of the one
 54 VII, 6  |          of accidental unities the two would be generally thought
 55 VII, 6  |           the white", since it has two meanings, it is not true
 56 VII, 10 |          in the least which of the two has this quality. But man
 57 VII, 11 |      formula of "line" is that of "two". And of those who assert
 58 VII, 11 |        assert the Ideas some make "two" the line-itself, and others
 59 VII, 11 |           Form are the same, e.g. "two" and the Form of two; but
 60 VII, 11 |         e.g. "two" and the Form of two; but in the case of "line"
 61 VII, 11 |            be called Socrates, has two meanings (for some mean
 62 VII, 12 |          it includes few or simply two; and of the two the one
 63 VII, 12 |          or simply two; and of the two the one is differentia and
 64 VII, 12 |         animal having feet, having two feet"; and if we divide
 65 VII, 13 |            is the universal. About two of these we have spoken;
 66 VII, 13 |          said that it underlies in two senses, either being a "
 67 VII, 13 |           will be the substance of two things. And in general it
 68 VII, 13 |           thus in complete reality two are never in complete reality
 69 VII, 13 |            if they are potentially two, they can be one (e.g. the
 70 VII, 13 |            double line consists of two halves-potentially; for
 71 VII, 13 |        thing cannot be made out of two nor two out of one; for
 72 VII, 13 |      cannot be made out of two nor two out of one; for he identifies
 73 VII, 13 |            as is said by some; for two is either not one, or there
 74 VII, 14 |           of feet? But perhaps the two things are "put together"
 75 VII, 15 |           15~Since substance is of two kinds, the concrete thing
 76 VIII, 1 |       thirdly the complex of these two, which alone is generated
 77 VIII, 1 |     involved. But in either one or two of the others this is not
 78 VIII, 2 |         which is composed of these two.~
 79 VIII, 4 |        thing comes from another in two senses, either because it
 80 VIII, 4 |             But perhaps the latter two are the same.-It is the
 81 VIII, 6 |            nor in-one Form, but in two, animal and biped, and in
 82  IX, 1  |      itself; for it is one and not two different things. And "impotence"
 83  IX, 5  |          or will. For whichever of two things the animal desires
 84  IX, 5  |        wish, or an appetite, to do two things or contrary things
 85  IX, 9  |           of the triangle equal to two right angles? Because the
 86  IX, 9  |       about one point are equal to two right angles. If, then,
 87  IX, 9  |          three lines are equal the two which form the base, and
 88  IX, 10 |            its angles are equal to two right angles while at another
 89   X, 1  |   contraries; for each of them has two meanings – "weight" means
 90   X, 1  |      determined by the ratios) are two, and the articulate sounds
 91   X, 1  |           its side are measured by two quantities, and all spatial
 92   X, 2  |            we must ask in which of two ways it exists. This is
 93   X, 3  |            kinds, and one of these two terms is privative in meaning,
 94   X, 4  |         nor can there be more than two extremes for the one interval),
 95   X, 4  |        difference, must be between two things.~And the other commonly
 96   X, 5  |         too in asking which of the two came; for if they might
 97   X, 5  |            both came or one of the two":-if, then, the question "
 98   X, 5  |          of the equal to the other two? It is not contrary either
 99   X, 5  |          who say the unequal is a "two"), but it follows that one
100   X, 5  |           one thing is contrary to two others, which is impossible.
101   X, 5  |           intermediate between any two things, but rather it always
102   X, 5  |            privation of one of the two; for why of the great rather
103   X, 5  |            both, not to one of the two (e.g. "whether it is greater
104   X, 5  |    interval; but between the other two there is no "difference";
105   X, 6  |          also to the few. Further, two will be many, since the
106   X, 6  |          derives its meaning from "two"; therefore one will be
107   X, 6  |           in comparison with which two are many, except one, which
108   X, 6  |            and this it must be, if two are many. But perhaps, while
109   X, 6  |          In this sense, then, even two is many-not, however, in
110   X, 6  |          But without qualification two is few; for it is first
111   X, 6  |          not one, as some say, but two, that make a few.~The one
112   X, 6  |        distinguished elsewhere the two senses in which relatives
113   X, 6  |          than something, e.g. than two; for if one is fewer, it
114  XI, 1  |   substances it is not. But if the two sciences are different,
115  XI, 2  |            How are we to think of "two", and each of the other
116  XI, 3  |     sometimes in one, sometimes in two, sometimes in three dimensions,
117  XI, 4  |            is continuous in one or two or three dimensions; but
118  XI, 6  |         and make the object appear two instead of one must be two (
119  XI, 6  |         two instead of one must be two (because they appear to
120  XI, 6  |       white; for the second of the two terms we have put together
121  XI, 9  |          its subjects in either of two ways (e.g. "this-ness"-for
122  XI, 9  |           principles in one of the two "columns of contraries"
123  XI, 9  |          same interval from one to two as from two to one, and
124  XI, 9  |            from one to two as from two to one, and as the steep
125  XI, 10 |        infinite; for if one of the two bodies falls at all short
126  XI, 12 |            possible that if one of two things in relation changes,
127  XI, 12 |            movement of movement in two senses; (1) movement might
128  XI, 12 |             one" does not succeed "two", nor the first day of the
129  XI, 12 |          of the contiguous. I call two things continuous when the
130  XI, 12 |         there is something between two of the former, but not between
131  XI, 12 |            former, but not between two of the latter.~
132 XII, 1  |       apart, some dividing it into two, others identifying the
133 XII, 1  |          others positing, of these two, only the objects of mathematics.
134 XII, 1  |            mathematics. The former two kinds of substance are the
135 XII, 2  |          since that which "is" has two senses, we must say that
136 XII, 2  |       principles, then, are three, two being the pair of contraries
137 XII, 3  |            are privations of these two.~There are three kinds of
138 XII, 3  |         which is composed of these two, e.g. Socrates or Callias.
139 XII, 4  |   principle" is divided into these two kinds; and that which acts
140 XII, 6  |          three kinds of substance, two of them physical and one
141 XII, 7  |            thought, and one of the two columns of opposites is
142 XII, 8  |          are the same as the first two mentioned above (for the
143 XII, 8  |          and to Saturn, he thought two more spheres should be added
144 XII, 8  |            be added to the sun and two to the moon, if one is to
145 XII, 8  |  counteract those of the outermost two planets will be six in number,
146 XII, 10 |          consider also in which of two ways the nature of the universe
147 XII, 10 |            however make one of the two contraries matter; this
148 XII, 10 |           bad itself is one of the two elements. But the other
149 XII, 10 |            being, at least, of the two is not the same. In which
150 XII, 10 |          us. And those who suppose two principles must suppose
151 XIII, 1 | predecessors, and others no worse.~Two opinions are held on this
152 XIII, 1 |            some recognize these as two different classes-the Ideas
153 XIII, 2 |          that it is impossible for two solids to be in the same
154 XIII, 2 |       their definitions; and these two properties are not coextensive.
155 XIII, 3 |            do exist; for being has two forms-it exists not only
156 XIII, 4 |         deals with contraries; for two things may be fairly ascribed
157 XIII, 6 |            another 1 besides these two), and the other numbers
158 XIII, 6 |        into magnitudes, nor do any two units taken at random make
159 XIII, 7 |      inassociable, in which of the two ways we distinguished. For
160 XIII, 7 |            adding another 1 to the two, and similarly. This being
161 XIII, 7 |          indefinite which makes it two 2’s other than the 2-itself;
162 XIII, 7 |       composed both of them and of two 5’s. But since the 10-itself
163 XIII, 7 |           in the 10 but only these two, or will there be others?
164 XIII, 7 |            the definite 2 and made two 2’s; for its nature was
165 XIII, 7 |           an entity apart from its two units, and the 3 an entity
166 XIII, 7 |          or the 3 consists; but as two men are not a unity apart
167 XIII, 7 |          is nothing apart from the two.~But this consequence also
168 XIII, 7 |          unit + another unit makes two, a unit from the 2-itself
169 XIII, 7 |            views say that not even two units are 2.~If the number
170 XIII, 8 |      inassociable in either of the two ways. But neither is the
171 XIII, 8 |            number is the same. For two mistakes must then meet
172 XIII, 8 |              b) But if each of the two units consists of both the
173 XIII, 8 |            matter. For each of the two is in a sense one-in truth
174 XIII, 8 |           one-in truth each of the two units exists potentially (
175 XIII, 9 |            naturally separated the two. Therefore it turns out
176 XIII, 9 |           universal combined these two characteristics in one thing,
177 XIII, 10|            has its angles equal to two right angles, unless every
178 XIII, 10|            has its angles equal to two right angles, nor that this
179 XIII, 10|          the verb "to know", means two things, of which one is
180 XIV, 1  |            as elements of numbers, two being matter, one the form;
181 XIV, 2  |         reason why there should be two kinds of white or many colours
182 XIV, 3  |            those who first posited two kinds of number, that of
183 XIV, 3  |           principle of each of the two kinds of number is a 1,
184 XIV, 4  |            of them who combine the two characters in that they
185 XIV, 4  |          the problem,-which of the two ways of speaking is right.
186 XIV, 5  |            three parts of fire and two of earth". And a number,
187 XIV, 6  |         e.g. it is "three parts to two", not "three times two".
188 XIV, 6  |          to two", not "three times two". For in any multiplication
189 XIV, 6  |            these three is equal to two of the other letters, and
190 XIV, 6  |          is equal in number to the two strings, and that the scansion