Book, Paragraph

  1  II, 3 |    accustomed to, and that which is different from this seems not in keeping
  2 III, 1 | imperishable things are the same or different; and whether they are all
  3 III, 2 |       sciences of the causes, and a different science for each different
  4 III, 2 |          different science for each different principle, which of these
  5 III, 2 |             would seem to belong to different sciences to investigate
  6 III, 2 |             as with substance, or a different science, and if it is not
  7 III, 2 |           deals with the axioms are different, which of them is by nature
  8 III, 2 |     sciences offer proofs), or of a different science? If of the same,
  9 III, 3 |        definition by genera will be different from that which states the
 10 III, 4 |             the substances many and different? This also is unreasonable.-
 11 III, 4 |          case of perceptible things different for different things (e.g.
 12 III, 4 |    perceptible things different for different things (e.g. since this
 13 III, 4 |           syllable, are numerically different in different contexts),-
 14 III, 4 |            numerically different in different contexts),-if it is not
 15 III, 4 | imperishable things are the same or different. If they are the same, how
 16 III, 4 |          the same. But if there are different principles, one difficulty
 17 III, 4 |          has even tried to maintain different principles; they maintain
 18 III, 4 |         natural philosophers take a different line; e.g. Empedocles-as
 19 III, 4 |          one in number. For what is different from being does not exist,
 20 III, 5 |          but yet seems to be always different, which shows that it is
 21  IV, 2 |           does not express anything different (it is clear that the two
 22  IV, 2 |          all; for a term belongs to different sciences not if it has different
 23  IV, 2 |    different sciences not if it has different senses, but if it has not
 24  IV, 3 |             it belongs to one or to different sciences to inquire into
 25  IV, 4 |           there might be assigned a different word. For instance, we might
 26  IV, 4 |          and "not-man" mean nothing different, obviously "not being a
 27  IV, 4 |            a man" will mean nothing different from "being a man"; so that "
 28  IV, 4 |             earlier’ that they mean different things.-Therefore, if it
 29  IV, 4 |          and "being a not-man" mean different things, since even "being
 30  IV, 4 |        white" and "being a man" are different; for the former terms are
 31  IV, 4 |          former terms are much more different so that they must a fortiori
 32  IV, 4 |           they must a fortiori mean different things. And if any one says
 33  IV, 5 |            not so".-But not even at different times does one sense disagree
 34  IV, 6 |            infinity of specifically different things.~Let this, then,
 35  IV, 7 |            its essence is something different.-Again, when a man, on being
 36   V, 3 |          into other forms of speech different in kind from them. If they
 37   V, 9 |            to those of "the same".~"Different" is applied (1) to those
 38   V, 9 |            attributes the same than different, and those whose quality
 39   V, 10|            subject, (2) to the most different of the things in the same
 40   V, 10|         same genus, (3) to the most different of the attributes in the
 41   V, 10|            subject, (4) to the most different of the things that fall
 42   V, 10|    correspond, so that they must be different for each category.~The term "
 43   V, 10|           but their definitions are different), and those which being
 44   V, 11|      reality is taken into account, different things are prior, for some
 45   V, 22|         blind man and a mole are in different senses "deprived" of sight;
 46   V, 24|              letter"; for this is a different sense from that in which
 47   V, 28|             proximate substratum is different, and which are not analysed
 48   V, 28|            e.g. form and matter are different in genus); and things which
 49   V, 28|          and things which belong to different categories of being (for
 50  VI, 2 |           nor whether "triangle" is different from "triangle whose angles
 51  VI, 2 |         musical" and "lettered" are different or the same, and whether "
 52  VI, 4 |         which is in this sense is a different sort of "being" from the
 53 VII, 3 |          predicated, whose being is different from that of each of the
 54 VII, 6 |             essence are the same or different. This is of some use for
 55 VII, 6 |          thing is thought to be not different from its substance, and
 56 VII, 6 |             generally thought to be different, e.g. white man would be
 57 VII, 6 |          man would be thought to be different from the essence of white
 58 VII, 6 |            essence of good is to be different from good-itself, and the
 59 VII, 6 |          Further, if they are to be different, the process will go on
 60 VII, 8 |      produce this form in something different from itself. For if we make
 61 VII, 8 |           or Socrates; and they are different in virtue of their matter (
 62 VII, 8 |           their matter (for that is different), but the same in form;
 63 VII, 10|      however, the soul is something different and is not identical with
 64 VII, 11|            to occur in specifically different materials, as a circle may
 65 VII, 11|             whose form is evidently different (a conclusion which confronted
 66 VII, 14|          and the same in number, or different. (In formula it is clearly
 67 VII, 14|              suppose the Form to be different in each species. Then there
 68 VIII, 2|         actuality or the formula is different when the matter is different;
 69 VIII, 2|        different when the matter is different; for in some cases it is
 70 VIII, 3|       longer the same number, but a different one, even if it is the very
 71 VIII, 4|             When the matter is one, different things may be produced owing
 72 VIII, 4|           chest and a bed. But some different things must have their matter
 73 VIII, 4|       things must have their matter different; e.g. a saw could not be
 74 VIII, 4|           same thing can be made of different material, clearly the art,
 75 VIII, 4|           and the moving cause were different, the product would be so
 76 VIII, 5|           one another, but it is in different senses that a pale man comes
 77  IX, 1 |             sense the potencies are different. For the one is in the thing
 78  IX, 1 |           for it is one and not two different things. And "impotence"
 79  IX, 3 |           potency and actuality are different (but these views make potency
 80  IX, 6 |       potentially and actually in a different sense from that which applies
 81  IX, 6 |          but what is being moved is different from what has been moved,
 82   X, 3 |            same), but that which is different is different from some particular
 83   X, 3 |          that which is different is different from some particular thing
 84   X, 3 |              i.e. if they belong to different figures of predication),
 85   X, 3 |  essentially predicated of both the different things).~Contraries are
 86   X, 3 |             things).~Contraries are different, and contrariety is a kind
 87   X, 3 |            these too are seen to be different; they are not merely other,
 88   X, 4 |           the same faculty the most different are contrary (for one science
 89   X, 5 |             are combined, belong to different classes, so that the substratum
 90   X, 7 |            white or black. They are different, then, from the primary
 91   X, 8 |         common nature attach to the different things, e.g. not only must
 92   X, 8 |         very animality must also be different for each (e.g. in the one
 93   X, 8 |       common nature is specifically different for each from what it is
 94   X, 8 |            all contraries which are different in species and not in genus
 95   X, 9 |           and a male animal are not different in species, though this
 96   X, 9 |            contrariety makes things different in species and another does
 97   X, 10|            the imperishable must be different in kind.~Now so far we have
 98   X, 10|        imperishable thing should be different from every perishable thing
 99   X, 10|             not every pale thing is different in form from every dark
100   X, 10|             that the things must be different in kind.~Evidently, then,
101  XI, 1 |             if the two sciences are different, what is each of them and
102  XI, 3 |           they are not the same but different, at least they are convertible;
103  XI, 3 |           things which are many and different in genus.~
104  XI, 6 |         change, though they produce different, and not identical, sensations
105  XI, 7 |            and evidently it must be different both from practical and
106  XI, 7 |             as physics or rather as different. Physics deals with the
107  XI, 7 |        unmovable there is a science different from both of these, if there
108  XI, 7 |             knowledge of it must be different and prior to physics and
109  XI, 12|             and things which are in different places are apart: things
110 XII, 2 |             change have matter, but different matter; and of eternal things
111 XII, 2 |            any and every thing, but different things come from different
112 XII, 2 |          different things come from different things; nor is it satisfactory
113 XII, 4 |        causes and the principles of different things are in a sense different,
114 XII, 4 |     different things are in a sense different, but in a sense, if one
115 XII, 4 |         principles and elements are different or the same for substances
116 XII, 4 |             for the product must be different from the elements. These
117 XII, 4 |     principles (though specifically different things have specifically
118 XII, 4 |            things have specifically different elements); but all things
119 XII, 4 |        matter. But each of these is different for each class; e.g. in
120 XII, 4 |        principle" and "element" are different both are causes, and "principle"
121 XII, 4 |    principles; but the elements are different in different things, and
122 XII, 4 |           elements are different in different things, and the proximate
123 XII, 4 |           proximate moving cause is different for different things. Health,
124 XII, 4 |       moving cause is different for different things. Health, disease,
125 XII, 5 |             these also are not only different for different things but
126 XII, 5 |          are not only different for different things but also apply in
127 XII, 5 |            things but also apply in different ways to them. For in some
128 XII, 5 |            form is not the same but different; e.g. the cause of man is (
129 XII, 5 |           causes of all things, yet different things have different causes
130 XII, 5 |           yet different things have different causes and elements, as
131 XII, 5 |      substances and quantities, are different except in an analogical
132 XII, 5 |             in the same species are different, not in species, but in
133 XII, 5 |            sense that the causes of different individuals are different,
134 XII, 5 |           different individuals are different, your matter and form and
135 XII, 5 |         form and moving cause being different from mine, while in their
136 XII, 5 |         causes are not the same but different, except that in the following
137 XII, 5 |             another sense there are different first causes, viz. all the
138 XII, 5 |             further, the matters of different things are different. We
139 XII, 5 |             of different things are different. We have stated, then, what
140 XII, 5 |          the same and in what sense different.~
141 XII, 6 |           which is always acting in different ways. This must, then, act
142 XII, 8 |             of the third sphere are different for each of the other planets,
143 XII, 9 |        thing always or of something different. Does it matter, then, or
144 XII, 9 |            and being thought of are different, in respect of which does
145 XII, 9 |           object of thought are not different in the case of things that
146 XII, 9 |           its best, being something different from it, is attained only
147 XII, 10|             confront those who hold different views from our own, and
148 XII, 10|    substance after another and give different principles for each, make
149 XIII, 1|         some recognize these as two different classes-the Ideas and the
150 XIII, 2|        numbers; for there will be a different set of units apart from
151 XIII, 3|          good and the beautiful are different (for the former always implies
152 XIII, 6|            and a second, each being different in species,-and either (
153 XIII, 6|           no one unit is in any way different from another. Or (c) some
154 XIII, 6|           mathematical number being different from the Ideas and from
155 XIII, 6|          objects of mathematics are different from those which come after
156 XIII, 7|             are undifferentiated or different each from each, number must
157 XIII, 7|      necessity. But (3) if those in different numbers are differentiated,
158 XIII, 7|             other, as "pale man" is different from "pale" and "man" (for
159 XIII, 7|           of the other, as "man" is different from "animal" and "two-footed".~
160 XIII, 7|          the 2, so that this is not different from the 2-itself. But this
161 XIII, 7|        claim that the units must be different, if there are to be Ideas;
162 XIII, 7|            but if the units are not different, the 2’s and the 3’s also
163 XIII, 7|            the 3’s also will not be different. This is also the reason
164 XIII, 8|         they are starting-points in different ways, one in definition
165 XIII, 8|            not like a heap, i.e. if different numbers consist of differentiated
166 XIII, 9|       things which answers to the 1 different thinkers describe in different
167 XIII, 9|      different thinkers describe in different ways, And in these also
168 XIII, 9|            from these and something different. And Socrates gave the impulse
169 XIV, 1 |        first principle is something different.~But these thinkers make
170 XIV, 1 |            other. Others oppose the different and the other to the One,
171 XIV, 1 |      contrary to the equal, and the different to the same, and the other
172 XIV, 2 |     quantitative and the "what" are different, we are not told whence
173 XIV, 5 |          which is produced by it is different from its elements, and on