| Table of Contents | Words: Alphabetical - Frequency - Inverse - Length - Statistics | Help | IntraText Library | ||
| Alphabetical [« »] 18 1 19 1 1x2x3 1 2 168 20 1 21 1 22 1 | Frequency [« »] 178 on 173 different 169 prior 168 2 167 any 166 true 164 way | Aristotle Metaphysics IntraText - Concordances 2 |
Book, Paragraph
1 II, 2 | 2~But evidently there is a 2 III, 1 | or to more sciences, and (2) whether such a science 3 III, 2 | 2~(1) First then with regard 4 III, 2 | these causes severally.~But (2), taking the starting-points 5 IV, 2 | 2~There are many senses in 6 IV, 4 | accidental to man. But (2) Socrates is musical, not 7 IV, 5 | generation at all belongs.~And (2) similarly some have inferred 8 IV, 6 | the same time true, and (2) what consequences follow 9 V, 1 | the contrary directions. (2) That from which each thing 10 V, 2 | 2~"Cause" means (1) that from 11 V, 2 | classes which include these. (2) The form or pattern, i.e. 12 V, 2 | include this (e.g. the ratio 2:1 and number in general 13 V, 2 | health, and both "the ratio 2:1" and "number" are causes 14 V, 3 | middle, are of this nature.~(2) People also transfer the 15 V, 4 | the "u" in phusis long. (2) That immanent part of a 16 V, 5 | that he may get his money.-(2) The compulsory and compulsion, 17 V, 6 | which is one by accident, (2) that which is one by its 18 V, 6 | called so in this way. (2) Of things that are called 19 V, 7 | in an accidental sense, (2) by their own nature.~(1) 20 V, 7 | predicated, itself is.~(2) The kinds of essential 21 V, 8 | is predicated of them.-(2) That which, being present 22 V, 9 | same in this sense, others (2) are the same by their own 23 V, 9 | in genus or by analogy; (2) to those whose genus is 24 V, 10| time to the same subject, (2) to the most different of 25 V, 11| prior in this sense, but (2) in another sense that which 26 V, 12| thing qua other, and also (2) the source of a thing’s 27 V, 14| differentia of the essence, but (2) there is another sense 28 V, 15| that which is exceeded; (2) as that which can heat 29 V, 15| though not in the same way.~(2) Things that are active 30 V, 16| is a part proper to it.-(2) That which in respect of 31 V, 17| within which every part is; (2) the form, whatever it may 32 V, 18| good is the good itself, (2) the proximate subject in 33 V, 18| what it was to be Callias;-(2) whatever is present in 34 V, 20| having of what we have.-(2) "Having" or "habit" means 35 V, 21| all others of the kind.-(2) The actualization of these-the 36 V, 22| be "deprived" of eyes.-(2) If, though either the thing 37 V, 23| the clothes they wear.-(2) That in which a thing is 38 V, 24| statue comes from bronze.-(2) As from the first moving 39 V, 25| called a part of three.-(2) The elements into which 40 V, 26| naturally a whole, and (2) that which so contains 41 V, 28| goes on continuously".-(2) It is used with reference 42 V, 28| generation of the same kind, (2) in reference to the first 43 V, 29| something that does not exist.~(2) A false account is the 44 V, 30| Aegina.~"Accident" has also (2) another meaning, i.e. all 45 VI, 2 | 2~But since the unqualified 46 VII, 1 | sense - (1) in definition, (2) in order of knowledge, ( 47 VII, 1 | substance must be present. And (2) we think we know each thing 48 VII, 2 | 2~Substance is thought to 49 VII, 6 | the essence of one, and (2) the one, so that to terms 50 VII, 14| expressions are absurd.~But (2) suppose the Form to be 51 VII, 17| go on to infinity. But (2) if it is a compound, clearly 52 VIII, 2| 2~Since the substance which 53 VIII, 3| is of this nature. And (2) as, when one of the parts 54 IX, 1 | not a certain quality and (2) that which might naturally 55 IX, 2 | 2~Since some such originative 56 IX, 7 | becoming is external. And (2) in the cases in which the 57 IX, 8 | knowledge of the other.~(2) In time it is prior in 58 X, 1 | indivisible and simpler. (2) That which is a whole and 59 X, 2 | 2~With regard to the substance 60 X, 3 | same numerically"; again, (2) we call a thing the same 61 X, 4 | the greatest); but also (2) the things in the same 62 X, 6 | called:-(1) as contraries; (2) as knowledge to thing known, 63 X, 7 | they stand between.~But (2) all intermediates stand 64 X, 7 | all in the same genus and (2) intermediate between contraries, 65 XI, 2 | 2~Further, must we suppose 66 XI, 12| change is not a subject. Or (2) some other subject might 67 XII, 2 | 2~Sensible substance is changeable. 68 XII, 4 | in substance. Further, (2) how can all things have 69 XII, 5 | peculiar form), and further (2) something else outside, 70 XII, 5 | common to all things; and (2) the causes of substances 71 XII, 7 | account of the matter, and (2) if it were not true, the 72 XIII, 1| mathematical numbers, and (2) some recognize both as 73 XIII, 2| 2~That it is impossible for 74 XIII, 4| common: for why should "2" be one and the same in 75 XIII, 4| the same in the perishable 2’s, or in the 2’s which are 76 XIII, 4| perishable 2’s, or in the 2’s which are many but eternal, 77 XIII, 4| and not the same in the "2 itself" as in the individual 78 XIII, 4| itself" as in the individual 2? But if they have not the 79 XIII, 6| some not; e.g. suppose that 2 is first after 1, and then 80 XIII, 6| e.g. those in the first 2 are associable with one 81 XIII, 6| numbers; but the units in the "2-itself" are inassociable 82 XIII, 6| is counted thus-after 1, 2 (which consists of another 83 XIII, 6| thus-after 1, a distinct 2 which does not include the 84 XIII, 6| which does not include the 2 and the rest of the number 85 XIII, 6| number series similarly. Or (2) one kind of number must 86 XIII, 6| units taken at random make 2. All who say the 1 is an 87 XIII, 7| posterior to the numbers.~But (2) if the units are inassociable, 88 XIII, 7| it be ideal number. For 2 will not proceed immediately 89 XIII, 7| successive numbers, as they say "2,3,4" for the units in the 90 XIII, 7| it will be prior also to 2 the composed of these; for 91 XIII, 7| will be a third unit in 2 before 3 exists, and a fourth 92 XIII, 7| first 1, and also that the 2’s should if there is a first 93 XIII, 7| should if there is a first 2; for after the first it 94 XIII, 7| the ideal 1, and that a 2 is first after it, is impossible.) 95 XIII, 7| and a third, and a first 2, but not also a second and 96 XIII, 7| that there should be a 2-itself and a 3-itself; and 97 XIII, 7| counted by addition, e.g. 2 by adding another 1 to the 98 XIII, 7| generate them, from the 2 and the 1; for 2 becomes 99 XIII, 7| from the 2 and the 1; for 2 becomes part of 3 and 3 100 XIII, 7| say 4 came from the first 2 and the indefinite which 101 XIII, 7| indefinite which makes it two 2’s other than the 2-itself; 102 XIII, 7| it two 2’s other than the 2-itself; if not, the 2-itself 103 XIII, 7| the 2-itself; if not, the 2-itself will be a part of 104 XIII, 7| part of 4 and one other 2 will be added. And similarly 105 XIII, 7| be added. And similarly 2 will consist of the 1-itself 106 XIII, 7| cannot be an indefinite 2; for it generates one unit, 107 XIII, 7| not, as the indefinite 2 does, a definite 2.~Again, 108 XIII, 7| indefinite 2 does, a definite 2.~Again, besides the 3-itself 109 XIII, 7| besides the 3-itself and the 2-itself how can there be 110 XIII, 7| can there be other 3’s and 2’s? And how do they consist 111 XIII, 7| there cannot be a first 2 and then a 3-itself. Yet 112 XIII, 7| not consist of any chance 2’s; for the indefinite as 113 XIII, 7| say, received the definite 2 and made two 2’s; for its 114 XIII, 7| definite 2 and made two 2’s; for its nature was to 115 XIII, 7| received.~Again, as to the 2 being an entity apart from 116 XIII, 7| to the units of which the 2 or the 3 consists; but as 117 XIII, 7| are prior and posterior 2 and similarly with the other 118 XIII, 7| other numbers. For let the 2’s in the 4 be simultaneous; 119 XIII, 7| those in the 8 and as the 2 generated them, they generated 120 XIII, 7| Therefore if the first 2 is an Idea, these 2’s also 121 XIII, 7| first 2 is an Idea, these 2’s also will be Ideas of 122 XIII, 7| for the units in the first 2 generate the four in 4, 123 XIII, 7| numbers. If not, not even the 2 in the 10-itself will be 124 XIII, 7| makes two, a unit from the 2-itself and one from the 125 XIII, 7| the 3-itself will make a 2. Now (a) this will consist 126 XIII, 7| is simultaneous with the 2. And we, for our part, suppose 127 XIII, 7| are equal or unequal, is 2, e.g. the good and the bad, 128 XIII, 7| that not even two units are 2.~If the number of the 3- 129 XIII, 7| greater than that of the 2, this is surprising; and 130 XIII, 7| number in it equal to the 2, so that this is not different 131 XIII, 7| is not different from the 2-itself. But this is not 132 XIII, 7| units are not different, the 2’s and the 3’s also will 133 XIII, 7| when we count thus – "1,2"-we do not proceed by adding 134 XIII, 7| when we count and say —1,2,3-we count by addition or 135 XIII, 8| as they say, but not a 2 which is first of 2’s, nor 136 XIII, 8| not a 2 which is first of 2’s, nor a 3 of 3’s; for the 137 XIII, 8| so, there must also be a 2 which is first of 2’s, and 138 XIII, 8| be a 2 which is first of 2’s, and similarly with the 139 XIII, 8| and there must be a first 2 and 3 and numbers must not 140 XIII, 8| peculiar to himself. And (2) he must also admit all 141 XIII, 8| equalized, how will the 2 which is a single thing, 142 XIII, 8| the unit is prior to the 2; for when it is destroyed 143 XIII, 8| when it is destroyed the 2 is destroyed. It must, then, 144 XIII, 8| produced; in another way, when 2 operates, the numbers got 145 XIII, 8| indivisible, line, then the 2 &c.; these entities also 146 XIII, 8| which is prior—1, or 3 or 2? Inasmuch as the number 147 XIII, 8| at the same time prior to 2; and again posterior, 2 148 XIII, 8| 2; and again posterior, 2 being treated as a whole, 149 XIII, 8| unity, and a form. But (2) because they were seeking 150 XIII, 8| starting-point), and the 2 is divisible but the unit 151 XIII, 8| liker the 1-itself than the 2 is. But if the unit is liker 152 XIII, 8| to the unit than to the 2; therefore each of the units 153 XIII, 8| therefore each of the units in 2 must be prior to the 2. 154 XIII, 8| in 2 must be prior to the 2. But they deny this; at 155 XIII, 8| least they generate the 2 first. Again, if the 2-itself 156 XIII, 8| the 2 first. Again, if the 2-itself is a unity and the 157 XIII, 8| is one also, both form a 2. From what, then, is this 158 XIII, 8| From what, then, is this 2 produced?~ 159 XIII, 9| nothing, e.g. between those in 2 or in 3 one might ask whether 160 XIII, 9| the terms that succeed it, 2 or either of the units in 161 XIII, 9| or either of the units in 2 is prior.~Similar difficulties 162 XIII, 9| we apprehend the unity in 2, or in general in a number, 163 XIII, 9| plurality, but the first; for 2 is said to be a "first plurality". 164 XIV, 1 | always predicated, e.g. 2 (which cannot be many, for 165 XIV, 2 | 2~We must inquire generally, 166 XIV, 5 | capable of intermixture, and (2) that which is produced 167 XIV, 5 | must have position; and (2) he who thinks of number 168 XIV, 5 | triangle and square. Or (2) is it because harmony is