Book, Paragraph

  1   I, 1  |           good, and similarly in the case of Socrates and in many
  2  II, 2  |             sake of another. And the case of the essence is similar.
  3  II, 2  |       essence is similar. For in the case of intermediates, which
  4  II, 2  |             For this is not like the case of the line, to whose divisibility
  5  II, 3  |           all cases, but only in the case of things which have no
  6 III, 1  |          difficulties, it is in like case with those who are bound;
  7 III, 1  |             are bound; for in either case it is impossible to go forward.
  8 III, 1  |           they were the parties to a case, must be in a better position
  9 III, 1  |           things, or this is not the case, but the substratum is something
 10 III, 2  |              imply change? So in the case of unchangeable things this
 11 III, 2  |             should be so only in the case of these intermediates,
 12 III, 3  |            difficulty of stating the case truly with regard to these
 13 III, 3  |          more unity.-Further, in the case of things in which the distinction
 14 III, 4  |         principles are not as in the case of perceptible things different
 15 III, 4  |             scarcely be in any other case anything apart from what
 16 III, 4  |             even if ore supposes the case to be such that, as some
 17 III, 4  |             same principle in either case. For it is not evident how
 18 III, 5  | simultaneously become one in the one case when they touch, and two
 19 III, 6  |         number; so is it also in the case of the intermediates; for
 20  IV, 2  |            also. For not only in the case of things which have one
 21  IV, 2  |             science, but also in the case of things which are related
 22  IV, 2  |            would even strengthen our case); for "one man" and "man"
 23  IV, 2  |      particular class; in the latter case difference is present over
 24  IV, 2  |            to what is primary in the case of each of the predicates
 25  IV, 2  |        meaning (and similarly in the case of the contraries), even
 26  IV, 4  |             can judge this to be the case. And among others many writers
 27  IV, 4  |            is. And (a) in the latter case there will be something
 28  IV, 5  |            authoritative, but in the case of colour sight, not taste,
 29  IV, 5  |            the authority, and in the case of flavour taste, not sight;
 30  IV, 5  |           terms, this is no less the case.~
 31  IV, 8  |              But again it is not the case that all things are at rest
 32   V, 2  |        general; and similarly in the case of accidental effects. Again,
 33   V, 2  |        causes are not always in this case; for the house does not
 34   V, 4  |           organic adhesion as in the case of embryos. Organic unity
 35   V, 4  |           contact; for in the latter case there need not be anything
 36   V, 4  |              in general; e.g. in the case of works in bronze, bronze
 37   V, 5  |            good; for when in the one case good, in the other life
 38   V, 6  |            and the same subject. The case is similar if the accident
 39   V, 6  |            it does not differ in the case of things whose kind is
 40   V, 6  |        definition is one, as, in the case of plane figures, is the
 41   V, 7  |         falses-and this alike in the case of affirmation and of negation;
 42   V, 7  |          rests. And similarly in the case of substances; we say the
 43   V, 11 |             the present, i.e. in the case of past events (for the
 44   V, 11 |             the present, i.e. in the case of future events (for the
 45   V, 11 |           the lowest; for in the one case the leader and in the other
 46   V, 12 |              walk. So too (4) in the case of passivity—(5) The states
 47   V, 12 |          either in general or in the case of something that would
 48   V, 24 |            the house; (in every such case the whole is a compound
 49   V, 26 |            by art, as we said in the case of unity also, wholeness
 50   V, 28 |            the figures is in the one case a plane of such and such
 51   V, 29 |          presumably be worse in this case as in the corresponding
 52   V, 29 |              as in the corresponding case of moral character.~
 53  VI, 1  |           nor productive. For in the case of things made the principle
 54  VI, 1  |           some faculty, while in the case of things done it is in
 55  VI, 1  |             define the "what" in the case of natural objects, and
 56  VI, 3  |               and this is either the case or not; so that he will
 57 VII, 1  |           and similarly in any other case of this sort; for none of
 58 VII, 4  |              in meaning (for in that case all formulae or sets of
 59 VII, 4  |         however, but just as, in the case of that which is not, some
 60 VII, 6  |            of each thing.~Now in the case of accidental unities the
 61 VII, 6  |           actually thought to be the case.~But in the case of so-called
 62 VII, 6  |              be the case.~But in the case of so-called self-subsistent
 63 VII, 6  |             its essence. And (b) the case is the same for other things
 64 VII, 7  |          materials, as in the former case the healthy man is produced
 65 VII, 8  |            but in form), i.e. in the case of natural products (for
 66 VII, 9  |            by nature are in the same case as these products of art.
 67 VII, 9  |             brass, and so too in the case of brass itself, if it comes
 68 VII, 9  |        before), so is it both in the case of substance and in that
 69 VII, 11 |             thing be evident. In the case of things which are found
 70 VII, 11 |             not clear when it is the case, some people already raise
 71 VII, 11 |             the question even in the case of the circle and the triangle,
 72 VII, 11 |              Form of two; but in the case of "line" they say this
 73 VII, 11 |          younger used to make in the case of "animal" is not sound;
 74 VII, 11 |          without the bronze. But the case is not similar; for an animal
 75 VII, 11 |          about the other. And in the case of definitions, how the
 76 VII, 11 |           way which is true of every case, and also why the formula
 77 VII, 11 |        primary substance-e.g. in the case of man the formula of the
 78 VII, 11 |           cases the same; ie. in the case of primary substances, e.g.
 79 VII, 12 |              as for instance, in the case of man, "two-footed animal";
 80 VII, 12 |              two-footed"? For in the case of "man" and "pale" there
 81 VII, 12 |            pale man". In the present case, on the other hand, one
 82 VII, 14 |        through the formula in either case.) If then there is a "man-in-himself"
 83 VII, 14 |    animal-itself?~Further, (3)in the case of sensible things both
 84 VII, 15 |              two-footed. (And in the case of eternal entities this
 85 VII, 15 |    individuals escapes notice in the case of eternal things, especially
 86 VII, 17 |             end, e.g. perhaps in the case of a house or a bed, and
 87 VII, 17 |     efficient cause is sought in the case of genesis and destruction,
 88 VII, 17 |         final cause is sought in the case of being also.~The object
 89 VII, 17 |              Evidently, then, in the case of simple terms no inquiry
 90 VII, 17 |                so that again in this case we can use the same argument
 91 VII, 17 |              same argument as in the case of flesh or of the syllable.
 92 VIII, 2 |       analogous to substance in each case; and as in substances that
 93 VIII, 3 |      impossible in some cases-in the case of things which cannot exist
 94 VIII, 4 |          inquire rightly. But in the case of natural but eternal substances
 95 VIII, 4 |           includes the cause. In the case of sleep it is not clear
 96 VIII, 6 |         cause of their unity? In the case of all things which have
 97 VIII, 6 |              actually-except, in the case of things which are generated,
 98  IX, 8  |               For if this is not the case, we shall have Pauson’s
 99  IX, 8  |             the act is in the former case the end and in the latter
100  IX, 9  |               is better. Also in the case of bad things the end or
101  IX, 10 |           answers to falsity, in one case there is truth if the subject
102  IX, 10 |           not combined; in the other case, if the object is existent
103  IX, 10 |      possible; for we cannot in this case suppose that one instance
104   X, 1  |          sort of measure. For in the case of a furlong or a talent
105   X, 1  |        escape our notice than in the case of something smaller; so
106   X, 2  |            definite thing, and in no case is its nature just this,
107   X, 4  |            already described; in one case we mean simply that the
108   X, 4  |       suffered privation, in another case that it has done so either
109   X, 5  |             is an extension from the case of opposites; for opposites
110   X, 6  |         there is a difference in the case of an easily-bounded continuum),
111   X, 8  |            for each (e.g. in the one case equinity, in the other humanity),
112  XI, 1  |          their attributes? If in the case of attributes demonstration
113  XI, 1  |         nature of the end-but in the case of things unmovable there
114  XI, 2  |           not separable, e.g. in the case of a house.~Further, are
115  XI, 3  |             of reference, in the one case to medical science, in the
116  XI, 3  |          something else, but in each case to one identical concept.
117  XI, 3  |         unjust man will not in every case have the whole definition
118  XI, 3  |           contraries are in the same case (for they are referred to
119  XI, 5  |       statement involves. But in any case if what is said by him is
120  XI, 6  |            others, unless in the one case the sense-organ which discriminates
121  XI, 7  |       productive science. For in the case of productive science the
122  XI, 9  |           what they are, viz. in one case a particular reality, in
123  XI, 9  |               This is evident in the case of contraries; for to be
124  XI, 9  |              of them is not one; the case of the mover and the moved
125  XI, 11 |          distinction is found in the case of the mover; for it causes
126  XI, 12 |          succeeds, e.g. lines in the case of a line, units in that
127 XII, 2  |          white, and similarly in the case of increase and diminution.
128 XII, 3  |             thing, it is only in the case of natural objects. And
129 XII, 4  |          terms, and similarly in the case of each of the categories.
130 XII, 4  |              the moving cause in the case of natural things is-for
131 XII, 8  |             moon involves, in either case, three spheres, of which
132 XII, 8  |            planets involves, in each case, four spheres, and of these
133 XII, 8  |            of the star which in each case is situated below the star
134 XII, 9  |             are not different in the case of things that have not
135 XII, 10 |            to our way of stating the case; for, on our view, the medical
136 XIII, 2 |            up into parts. But in the case of the subjects of mathematics,
137 XIII, 3 |             sensibles, so too in the case of mobiles there will be
138 XIII, 4 |       substances, and so also in the case of all other groups there
139 XIII, 4 |            is single not only in the case of substances, but also
140 XIII, 4 |            to the necessities of the case and the opinions about the
141 XIII, 5 |             apart?~In the Phaedo the case is stated in this way-that
142 XIII, 6 |              any, as they say is the case with mathematical number;
143 XIII, 6 |        itself"; and similarly in the case of the other successive
144 XIII, 6 |             identical with this.~The case of lines, planes, and solids
145 XIII, 7 |              the same happens in the case of the succeeding numbers,
146 XIII, 8 |             or the other must be the case, so that if neither is,
147 XIII, 9 |            it is hard to make a good case out of bad materials, according
148 XIII, 10|          what a thing is" is in each case one). And if the syllables
149 XIII, 10|          entity. But if, e.g. in the case of the elements of speech,
150 XIV, 1  |       natural things, so also in the case of unchangeable substances.
151 XIV, 1  |               must be present in the case of contraries, if anywhere.
152 XIV, 1  |              a measure. And in every case there is some underlying
153 XIV, 1  |           indivisible, in the former case in kind, and in the latter
154 XIV, 2  |          from substances. But in the case of "thises", it is possible