Book, Paragraph

  1   I, 1 | experience seems pretty much like science and art, but really science
  2   I, 1 |       science and art, but really science and art come to men through
  3  II, 2 |           the learner is a man of science in the making, and this
  4  II, 2 |           from a learner a man of science is being made); on the other
  5  II, 2 |      those who speak thus destroy science; for it is not possible
  6  II, 3 |     method is not that of natural science; for presumably the whole
  7  II, 3 |       shall also see what natural science treats of (and whether it
  8  II, 3 |         whether it belongs to one science or to more to investigate
  9 III, 1 |          must, with a view to the science which we are seeking, first
 10 III, 1 |            and (2) whether such a science should survey only the first
 11 III, 1 |         questions; and (3) if the science in question deals with substance,
 12 III, 1 |       with substance, whether one science deals with all substances,
 13 III, 2 |        How could it belong to one science to recognize the principles
 14 III, 2 |           causes, and a different science for each different principle,
 15 III, 2 |           even contradict it, the science of the end and of the good
 16 III, 2 |          object of knowledge, the science of substance must be of
 17 III, 2 |        they are the object of one science or of more (by the starting-points
 18 III, 2 |      question is whether the same science deals with them as with
 19 III, 2 |         substance, or a different science, and if it is not one science,
 20 III, 2 |     science, and if it is not one science, which of the two must be
 21 III, 2 |       should be the object of one science; for why should it be peculiarly
 22 III, 2 |          geometry or to any other science to understand these matters?
 23 III, 2 |          then it belongs to every science alike, and cannot belong
 24 III, 2 |         it is not peculiar to the science which investigates substances,
 25 III, 2 |        any more than to any other science, to know about these topics.-
 26 III, 2 |           what way can there be a science of the first principles?
 27 III, 2 |          there is a demonstrative science which deals with them, there
 28 III, 2 |        use the axioms.~But if the science of substance and the science
 29 III, 2 |      science of substance and the science which deals with the axioms
 30 III, 2 |         substances fall under one science or under more than one?
 31 III, 2 |          substance is the present science to be assigned?-On the other
 32 III, 2 |           not reasonable that one science should deal with all. For
 33 III, 2 |        would be one demonstrative science dealing with all attributes.
 34 III, 2 |            For ever demonstrative science investigates with regard
 35 III, 2 |            is the business of one science. For the subject belongs
 36 III, 2 |        the subject belongs to one science, and the premisses belong
 37 III, 2 |          the business of the same science to know these and to know
 38 III, 2 |        proofs), or of a different science? If of the same, the science
 39 III, 2 |      science? If of the same, the science of substance also must be
 40 III, 2 |           must be a demonstrative science, but it is thought that
 41 III, 2 |         another, what will be the science that investigates the attributes
 42 III, 2 |    evidently there will also be a science other than medicine, intermediate
 43 III, 2 |           this individual medical science, and so with each of the
 44  IV, 1 |                      1~THERE is a science which investigates being
 45  IV, 2 |            As, then, there is one science which deals with all healthy
 46  IV, 2 |       investigation belong to one science, but also in the case of
 47  IV, 2 |        that it is the work of one science also to study the things
 48  IV, 2 |         qua being.-But everywhere science deals chiefly with that
 49  IV, 2 |       perception, so there is one science, as for instance grammar,
 50  IV, 2 |       instance grammar, being one science, investigates all articulate
 51  IV, 2 |        qua being is the work of a science which is generically one,
 52  IV, 2 |         the specific parts of the science.~If, now, being and unity
 53  IV, 2 |         of these is the work of a science which is generically one-I
 54  IV, 2 |           is a first and a second science and other successive ones
 55  IV, 2 |       since it is the work of one science to investigate opposites,
 56  IV, 2 |       unity-and it belongs to one science to investigate the negation
 57  IV, 2 |        within the province of the science above named. And contrariety
 58  IV, 2 |         but yet it belongs to one science to know them all; for a
 59  IV, 2 |            that it belongs to one science to be able to give an account
 60  IV, 2 |           that it belongs to this science to investigate both the
 61  IV, 2 |        too that it belongs to one science to examine being qua being.
 62  IV, 2 |           And these belong to one science, whether they have or have
 63  IV, 2 |        then it is the work of one science to examine being qua being,
 64  IV, 2 |           qua being, and the same science will examine not only substances
 65  IV, 3 |         these also belongs to one science, and that the science of
 66  IV, 3 |         one science, and that the science of the philosopher; for
 67   V, 15|           term because its genus, science, is thought to be a relative
 68  VI, 1 |      causes, and in general every science which is ratiocinative or
 69  VI, 1 |          it is.~And since natural science, like other sciences, is
 70  VI, 1 |     physics must be a theoretical science, but it will theorize about
 71  VI, 1 |            then, is a theoretical science, is plain from these considerations.
 72  VI, 1 |          belongs to a theoretical science,-not, however, to physics (
 73  VI, 1 |          to mathematics, but to a science prior to both. For physics
 74  VI, 1 |           matter; while the first science deals with things which
 75  VI, 1 |        this sort. And the highest science must deal with the highest
 76  VI, 1 |         formed by nature, natural science will be the first science;
 77  VI, 1 |         science will be the first science; but if there is an immovable
 78  VI, 1 |          immovable substance, the science of this must be prior and
 79  VI, 2 |     confirmed by the fact that no science practical, productive, or
 80  VI, 2 |          things that are; and the science of building does not aim
 81  VI, 2 |      become clear why there is no science of it.~Since, among things
 82  VI, 2 |      later,’ but that there is no science of the accidental is obvious;
 83  VI, 2 |    accidental is obvious; for all science is either of that which
 84  VI, 2 |         contrary to the usual law science will be unable to state,
 85  VI, 2 |      arises, and that there is no science which deals with it.~
 86  IX, 2 |        health. The reason is that science is a rational formula, and
 87  IX, 2 |      occur in the same thing, but science is a potency which depends
 88  IX, 6 |          is not studying a man of science, if he is capable of studying;
 89  IX, 8 |        one who does not possess a science will be doing that which
 90  IX, 8 |        which is the object of the science; for he who is learning
 91  IX, 8 |          possess some part of the science. But here too, then, it
 92  IX, 8 |        may build, and theoretical science that they may theorize;
 93  IX, 8 |         they may have theoretical science, except those who are learning
 94   X, 4 |   different are contrary (for one science deals with one class of
 95  XI, 1 |                1~THAT Wisdom is a science of first principles is evident
 96  XI, 1 |         is to be conceived as one science or as several. If as one,
 97  XI, 1 |          may be objected that one science always deals with contraries,
 98  XI, 1 |         is it the business of one science, or of more than one, to
 99  XI, 1 |          is doubtful how the same science can embrace several subject-matters.~
100  XI, 1 |          it as demonstrative, the science of the attributes is Wisdom,
101  XI, 1 |         with what is primary, the science of substances claims the
102  XI, 1 |           the tide.~But again the science we are looking for must
103  XI, 1 |         say whether perchance the science we are now looking for deals
104  XI, 1 |         demand.) Nor (b) does the science which we are now seeking
105  XI, 1 |         question, to what kind of science it belongs to discuss the
106  XI, 1 |         and rest), nor yet to the science which inquires into demonstration
107  XI, 1 |   inquires into demonstration and science; for this is just the subject
108  XI, 1 |          the question whether the science we are seeking should be
109  XI, 1 |         might be thought that the science we seek should treat rather
110  XI, 1 |        every definition and every science is of universals and not
111  XI, 2 |           or is it these that the science we are seeking treats of?
112  XI, 2 |        genera or species; but the science we now seek treats of neither
113  XI, 3 |                       3~Since the science of the philosopher treats
114  XI, 3 |           does not fall under one science (for the meanings of an
115  XI, 3 |         being will fall under one science. The term seems to be used
116  XI, 3 |           the one case to medical science, in the other to health,
117  XI, 3 |      former proceeds from medical science, and the latter is useful
118  XI, 3 |      examined by one and the same science, and in each pair one term
119  XI, 3 |         we posit one and the same science of all these things—geometry)—
120  XI, 3 |          the business of no other science than philosophy to investigate;
121  XI, 3 |           sort can fall under one science, the difficulty we stated
122  XI, 3 |         how there can be a single science of things which are many
123  XI, 4 |        being (whereas the primary science, we have said, deals with
124  XI, 7 |                           7~Every science seeks certain principles
125  XI, 7 |         not however qua real; the science that does this is another
126  XI, 7 |   substance or "what".~There is a science of nature, and evidently
127  XI, 7 |     practical and from productive science. For in the case of productive
128  XI, 7 |         in the case of productive science the principle of movement
129  XI, 7 |        And similarly in practical science the movement is not in the
130  XI, 7 |      rather in the doers. But the science of the natural philosopher
131  XI, 7 |         facts, then, that natural science must be neither practical
132  XI, 7 |          matter.~Since there is a science of being qua being and capable
133  XI, 7 |          is theoretical, and is a science that deals with things that
134  XI, 7 |           is unmovable there is a science different from both of these,
135  XI, 7 |         existing things, and each science is called better or worse
136  XI, 7 |          the question whether the science of being qua being is to
137  XI, 8 |         time on non-being.~That a science of the accidental is not
138  XI, 8 |           obvious why there is no science of such a thing; for all
139  XI, 8 |          of such a thing; for all science is of that which is always
140 XII, 1 |           kind belongs to another science, if there is no principle
141 XII, 8 |            of astronomy; for this science speculates about substance
142 XII, 8 |        probably each art and each science has often been developed
143 XIII, 2|         the motionless solid; for science always deals with what is
144 XIII, 3|    healthy thing is pale, and the science has the healthy as its subject),
145 XIII, 3|           simplicity. Therefore a science which abstracts from spatial
146 XIII, 3|      takes it into account; and a science is most precise if it abstracts
147 XIII, 4|          inquire whether the same science deals with contraries; for
148 XIII, 4|        with the starting-point of science):-but Socrates did not make
149 XIV, 3 |           the language of natural science, it is fair to make some