Book, Paragraph

  1  II, 2 |            But in both cases it is impossible that the number of terms
  2  II, 2 |             At the same time it is impossible that the first cause, being
  3  II, 2 |       terms. And knowledge becomes impossible; for how can one apprehend
  4  II, 2 |          knowledge would have been impossible; for we think we know, only
  5 III, 1 |           for in either case it is impossible to go forward. Hence one
  6 III, 2 |          must be axioms (for it is impossible that there should be demonstration
  7 III, 2 |         suppose it moving is quite impossible.-And similarly with the
  8 III, 2 |         however, but in these; the impossible results of this view would
  9 III, 2 |         place; which is still more impossible.~
 10 III, 4 |   discussion just now that this is impossible.~Further, if we admit in
 11 III, 4 |          at all, and since this is impossible there must be something
 12 III, 4 |            principles. But this is impossible, whether the process has
 13 III, 4 |            probable, but is either impossible or needs much proof. Further,
 14 III, 6 |        kind, we have mentioned the impossible results that necessarily
 15  IV, 3 |         that regarding which it is impossible to be mistaken; for such
 16  IV, 3 |  definition given above. For it is impossible for any one to believe the
 17  IV, 3 |  necessarily believe; and if it is impossible that contrary attributes
 18  IV, 3 |    contrary to it, obviously it is impossible for the same man at the
 19  IV, 4 |        have now posited that it is impossible for anything at the same
 20  IV, 4 |            of education. For it is impossible that there should be demonstration
 21  IV, 4 |  negatively even that this view is impossible, if our opponent will only
 22  IV, 4 |       obviously reasoning would be impossible; for not to have one meaning
 23  IV, 4 |        been annihilated; for it is impossible to think of anything if
 24  IV, 4 |         and has one meaning; it is impossible, then, that "being a man"
 25  IV, 4 |           this is necessary, it is impossible that the same thing should
 26  IV, 4 |        necessary" means-that it is impossible for the thing not to be.
 27  IV, 4 |            not to be. It is, then, impossible that it should be at the
 28  IV, 4 |          opposites. But if this is impossible, then what we have maintained
 29  IV, 4 |       besides other reasons, it is impossible to enumerate its accidental
 30  IV, 4 |          ad infinitum. But this is impossible; for not even more than
 31  IV, 5 |   Heraclitus for saying that it is impossible to step twice into the same
 32  IV, 5 |            apart from sensation is impossible. For sensation is surely
 33  IV, 6 |           in argument seek what is impossible; for they demand to be allowed
 34  IV, 6 |       assert this. Now since it is impossible that contradictories should
 35  IV, 6 | determinate genus. If, then, it is impossible to affirm and deny truly
 36  IV, 6 |          the same time, it is also impossible that contraries should belong
 37  IV, 7 |           nor not-odd. But this is impossible, as is obvious from the
 38  IV, 8 |             so that since they are impossible, the double statement must
 39  IV, 8 |           double statement must be impossible too.-Again, there are obviously
 40  IV, 8 |            is false to deny, it is impossible that all statements should
 41  IV, 8 |        assert or to deny it, it is impossible that both should be false;
 42  IV, 8 |            been shown that this is impossible. Again, it must be that
 43   V, 12|           are used as follows. The impossible is that of which the contrary
 44   V, 12|      commensurate with the side is impossible, because such a statement
 45  VI, 2 |          most part. Surely this is impossible. There is, then, besides
 46 VII, 3 |          is substance. But this is impossible; for both separability and "
 47 VII, 5 |            the same (because it is impossible to speak of snubness apart
 48 VII, 5 | concavity-in-a-nose), either it is impossible to say "snub nose" or the
 49 VII, 7 |          as the saying goes, it is impossible that anything should be
 50 VII, 13|           point also. For it seems impossible that any universal term
 51 VII, 13|           to it. And further it is impossible and absurd that the "this",
 52 VII, 13|            to the "this". Which is impossible; for neither in formula
 53 VII, 14|  two-footed" and "many-footed", an impossible conclusion follows; for
 54 VII, 14|      substance of another; this is impossible. The "animal", then, present
 55 VII, 14|             these consequences are impossible, clearly there are not Forms
 56 VIII, 3|      except that obviously this is impossible in some cases-in the case
 57 VIII, 3|         possible and in what sense impossible—and of the reduction of
 58  IX, 3 |        other arts. If, then, it is impossible to have such arts if one
 59  IX, 3 |      acquired them, and it is then impossible not to have them if one
 60  IX, 3 |           if there will be nothing impossible in its having the actuality
 61  IX, 3 |         sit, there will be nothing impossible in its actually sitting;
 62  IX, 4 |          be, there will be nothing impossible in this; but the result
 63  IX, 4 |             but the result will be impossible, for the measuring of the
 64  IX, 4 |       measuring of the diagonal is impossible. For the false and the impossible
 65  IX, 4 |  impossible. For the false and the impossible are not the same; that you
 66  IX, 4 |          should be standing is not impossible.~At the same time it is
 67  IX, 4 |             we agreed that nothing impossible followed if A were supposed
 68  IX, 4 |            But we supposed B to be impossible. Let it be impossible then.
 69  IX, 4 |           be impossible. Let it be impossible then. If, then, B is impossible,
 70  IX, 4 |    impossible then. If, then, B is impossible, A also must be so. But
 71  IX, 4 |         But the first was supposed impossible; therefore the second also
 72  IX, 4 |       therefore the second also is impossible. If, then, A is possible,
 73  IX, 5 |         the same time; but this is impossible. There must, then, be something
 74  IX, 8 |          This is why it is thought impossible to be a builder if one has
 75   X, 1 |            Now where it is thought impossible to take away or to add,
 76   X, 5 |            to two others, which is impossible. Again, the equal is evidently
 77   X, 6 |        opposed to the one, certain impossible results follow. One will
 78   X, 7 |            that an intermediate is impossible between things which are
 79  XI, 2 |             The reason why this is impossible has been stated. Indeed,
 80  XI, 5 |           not signify; and this is impossible. Therefore if "this is"
 81  XI, 10|         each should be infinite is impossible. For body is that which
 82  XI, 10|         always moving. But this is impossible; for why should it rather
 83  XI, 10|            then? And how? (This is impossible.) What then is its rest
 84  XI, 10|           elements; and if this is impossible, and the places are finite,
 85  XI, 12|           or increase. But this is impossible; for change is not a subject.
 86 XII, 3 |       reason; for presumably it is impossible that all soul should survive.)
 87 XII, 6 |            destructible. But it is impossible that movement should either
 88 XII, 6 |           were together", the same impossible result ensues. For how will
 89 XII, 7 |          without which the good is impossible, and that which cannot be
 90 XII, 10|           fail to observe how many impossible or paradoxical results confront
 91 XIII, 2|                       2~That it is impossible for mathematical objects
 92 XIII, 2|        have pointed out that it is impossible for two solids to be in
 93 XIII, 2|          that on this theory it is impossible for any body whatever to
 94 XIII, 2|           nor time. And if this is impossible, plainly it is also impossible
 95 XIII, 2|     impossible, plainly it is also impossible that the former entities
 96 XIII, 5|         copy.~Again, it would seem impossible that substance and that
 97 XIII, 6|            and all these views are impossible, but some perhaps more than
 98 XIII, 7|         way, though in truth it is impossible. For it is reasonable both
 99 XIII, 7|            2 is first after it, is impossible.) But they make a first
100 XIII, 7|             But if the results are impossible, it is also impossible that
101 XIII, 7|         are impossible, it is also impossible that these are the generating
102 XIII, 8|            one supposes this, many impossible results, as we have said,
103 XIII, 8|     separately removes many of the impossible consequences; but that bodies
104 XIII, 8|            mathematical number, is impossible. For it is not true to speak
105 XIII, 8|          in both ways. But this is impossible. For the universal is one
106 XIII, 9|            words "not easy" to the impossible. For when we apprehend the
107 XIII, 9|         the unit is a plurality is impossible, for it is indivisible;
108 XIV, 1 |           strange, then, or rather impossible, to make not-substance an
109 XIV, 2 |           it is strange, or rather impossible, that the coming into play
110 XIV, 3 |         one of the things that are impossible. There need be no doubt
111 XIV, 4 |          an element of numbers, is impossible. Powerful objections arise,
112 XIV, 5 |            If, then, it is equally impossible not to put the good among