Book, Paragraph

  1 III, 1 |           most perplexing, whether unity and being, as the Pythagoreans
  2 III, 3 |         some also of those who say unity or being, or the great and
  3 III, 3 |             so that both being and unity will be principles and substances;
  4 III, 3 |           not possible that either unity or being should be a single
  5 III, 3 |           differentiae; so that if unity or being is a genus, no
  6 III, 3 |            being or be one. But if unity and being are not genera,
  7 III, 3 |           principle.-But again, if unity is more of the nature of
  8 III, 3 |         individuals will have more unity.-Further, in the case of
  9 III, 4 |           so far as they have some unity and identity, and in so
 10 III, 4 |         truth is whether being and unity are the substances of things,
 11 III, 4 |         anything else, is being or unity respectively, or we must
 12 III, 4 |        must inquire what being and unity are, with the implication
 13 III, 4 |     Pythagoreans thought being and unity were nothing else, but this
 14 III, 4 |           their essence being just unity and being. But the natural
 15 III, 4 |        more intelligible-says what unity is; for he would seem to
 16 III, 4 |         being one. Others say this unity and being, of which things
 17 III, 4 |           these also must say that unity and being are precisely
 18 III, 4 |            A) If we do not suppose unity and being to be substances,
 19 III, 4 |            all, and if there is no unity itself or being-itself,
 20 III, 4 |           individuals. Further, if unity is not a substance, evidently
 21 III, 4 |   unity-itself and a being itself, unity and being must be their
 22 III, 4 |          are and are one, but just unity and being. But if there
 23 III, 4 |            both views. For whether unity is not a substance or there
 24 III, 4 |         why this result follows if unity is not a substance; and
 25  IV, 2 |        science.~If, now, being and unity are the same and are one
 26  IV, 2 |          means the same thing, and unity is nothing apart from being;
 27  IV, 2 |        many species of being as of unity. And to investigate the
 28  IV, 2 |        these or from plurality and unity, must fall within the province
 29  IV, 2 |         essential modifications of unity qua unity and of being qua
 30  IV, 2 |         modifications of unity qua unity and of being qua being,
 31  IV, 2 |        being and non-being, and to unity and plurality, as for instance
 32  IV, 2 |           instance rest belongs to unity and movement to plurality.
 33  IV, 2 |         are evidently reducible to unity and plurality (this reduction
 34  IV, 2 |        composed of contraries, and unity and plurality are the starting-points
 35  IV, 2 |      contraries), even if being or unity is not a universal and the
 36  IV, 2 |            it probably is not; the unity is in some cases that of
 37  IV, 2 |     contrariety or completeness or unity or being or the same or
 38  IV, 4 |           another accident; for no unity can be got out of such a
 39   V, 3 |        many as possible), and that unity and the point are thought
 40   V, 4 |      contact and either by organic unity, or by organic adhesion
 41   V, 4 |           case of embryos. Organic unity differs from contact; for
 42   V, 6 |         horse, man, and dog form a unity, because all are animals),
 43   V, 6 |          whole, i.e. unless it has unity of form; e.g. if we saw
 44   V, 6 |        fourth. The latter kinds of unity are always found when the
 45   V, 9 |           therefore, sameness is a unity of the being either of more
 46   V, 15|         the same. For all refer to unity. Those things are the same
 47   V, 26|          contains that they form a unity; and this in two senses-either
 48   V, 26|         thing, or as making up the unity between them. For (a) that
 49   V, 26|           is a whole, when it is a unity consisting of several parts,
 50   V, 26|          as we said in the case of unity also, wholeness being in
 51  VI, 4 |         thoughts but they become a unity); for falsity and truth
 52 VII, 6 |           real, nor the essence of unity one. And all essences alike
 53 VII, 9 |          to be, it is its concrete unity that comes to be (for the
 54 VII, 12|            wherein can consist the unity of that, the formula of
 55 VII, 12|         belong to the other, but a unity when it does belong and
 56 VII, 12|      certain attribute; for then a unity is produced and we have "
 57 VII, 12|            for on this principle a unity can be made out of all the
 58 VII, 16|         air; for none of them is a unity, but as it were a mere heap,
 59 VII, 16|        they are worked up and some unity is made out of them. One
 60 VII, 16|       abnormality.~Since the term "unity" is used like the term "
 61 VII, 16| numerically one, evidently neither unity nor being can be the substance
 62 VII, 16|        these concepts "being" and "unity" are more substantial than "
 63 VIII, 6|         what is the cause of their unity? In the case of all things
 64 VIII, 6|            contact is the cause of unity in some cases, and in others
 65 VIII, 6|           what is the cause of the unity of "round" and "bronze"?
 66 VIII, 6|       nature essentially a kind of unity, as it is essentially a
 67 VIII, 6|          its very nature a kind of unity as it is a kind of being-and
 68 VIII, 6|        kind of being and a kind of unity, not as being in the genus "
 69 VIII, 6|           the sense that being and unity can exist apart from particulars.~
 70 VIII, 6|            to the difficulty about unity some speak of "participation",
 71 VIII, 6|            general is the cause of unity and of a thing’s being one;
 72 VIII, 6|           one; for each thing is a unity, and the potential and the
 73  IX, 1 |           as a thing is an organic unity, it cannot be acted on by
 74   X, 1 |            of these, that has more unity and is prior, whose movement
 75   X, 1 |        which one of these kinds of unity belongs will be one; but "
 76   X, 1 |       remarkable.~Evidently, then, unity in the strictest sense,
 77   X, 2 |          only a predicate, clearly unity also cannot be a substance;
 78   X, 2 |           substance; for being and unity are the most universal of
 79   X, 2 |        similar in all the kinds of unity. Now "unity" has just as
 80   X, 2 |           the kinds of unity. Now "unity" has just as many meanings
 81   X, 2 |           is its nature just this, unity, is evident; but as in colours
 82   X, 2 |         substance. That in a sense unity means the same as being
 83   X, 3 |         these equality constitutes unity.~Things are like if, not
 84   X, 5 |            black has more claim to unity. Yet even this has not one
 85  XI, 1 |           turn out to be being and unity; for these might most of
 86  XI, 2 | unchangeable principles, being and unity, firstly, if each of these
 87  XI, 2 |      predicated of all things (and unity also of some); but that
 88  XI, 2 |        that the first principle is unity and this is substance, and
 89  XI, 2 |          as the first product from unity and from matter, assert
 90  XI, 2 |            there is a substance of unity and the point? Every substance
 91  XI, 3 |            being are plurality and unity, or likeness and unlikeness,
 92  XI, 3 |            referred to being or to unity. For even if they are not
 93  XI, 12|          the things out of which a unity naturally arises in virtue
 94  XI, 12|      touching, there is no organic unity); therefore a point is not
 95 XII, 3 |        contact and not, by organic unity are matter and substratum,
 96 XII, 4 |       intelligibles, e.g. being or unity, is an element; for these
 97 XII, 4 |         are the principles, or any unity which is produced out of
 98 XIII, 7|            it is possible that any unity is inassociable with any,
 99 XIII, 7|           but as two men are not a unity apart from both, so must
100 XIII, 8|           least if the number is a unity and not like a heap, i.e.
101 XIII, 8|            standpoint they treated unity, their first principle,
102 XIII, 8|        being treated as a whole, a unity, and a form. But (2) because
103 XIII, 8|         universal they treated the unity which can be predicated
104 XIII, 8|        Again, if the 2-itself is a unity and the 3-itself is one
105 XIII, 9|          For when we apprehend the unity in 2, or in general in a
106 XIV, 3 |          from its instances-of the unity of each general term they
107 XIV, 3 |            kinds of number is a 1, unity will be something common
108 XIV, 4 |        substance lay mainly in its unity.~This, then, is the problem,-
109 XIV, 5 |            be able to think of the unity and the plurality apart;