Book, Paragraph

  1 III, 1 |       first problem concerns the subject which we discussed in our
  2 III, 2 | premisses and be about a certain subject and prove certain attributes.
  3 III, 2 | investigates with regard to some subject its essential attributes,
  4 III, 2 |          of one science. For the subject belongs to one science,
  5 III, 5 |          all are predicated of a subject, and none is a "this". And
  6  IV, 3 |        certain principles of his subject, so that he whose subject
  7  IV, 3 |        subject, so that he whose subject is existing things qua existing
  8  IV, 3 |       and not belong to the same subject and in the same respect;
  9  IV, 3 |        the same time to the same subject (the usual qualifications
 10  IV, 4 |    signifies something about one subject but also has one significance (
 11  IV, 4 |   signifying something about one subject", since on that assumption
 12  IV, 4 |          accidents, all that the subject is or is not; and if he
 13  IV, 4 |      implies predication about a subject. The predication, then,
 14  IV, 4 |        are accidents of the same subject. I mean, for instance, that
 15  IV, 4 |  statements are true of the same subject at the same time, evidently
 16  IV, 4 |          must predicate of every subject the affirmation or the negation
 17  IV, 4 |          it is absurd if of each subject its own negation is to be
 18  IV, 4 |         than the negative of the subject itself. If, then, even the
 19  IV, 4 |         predicated alike of each subject, one thing will in no wise
 20  IV, 6 |    contraries should belong to a subject at the same time, unless
 21  IV, 7 |      contradictories, but of one subject we must either affirm or
 22   V, 1 |         and the beginning of the subject, but from the point from
 23   V, 6 |     accident of one and the same subject. The case is similar if
 24   V, 7 |       belongs is, or because the subject which has as an attribute
 25   V, 7 |     predicates indicate what the subject is, others its quality,
 26   V, 8 |          are not predicated of a subject but everything else is predicated
 27   V, 8 |          are not predicated of a subject, is the cause of their being,
 28   V, 9 |      predicable of more than one subject, and therefore we do not
 29   V, 10|        the same time to the same subject, (2) to the most different
 30   V, 10| attributes in the same recipient subject, (4) to the most different
 31   V, 11|          of "being", firstly the subject is prior, so that substance
 32   V, 18|        itself, (2) the proximate subject in which it is the nature
 33   V, 29|         it,-one predicate to one subject; from which the conclusion
 34   V, 30|           whatever attaches to a subject, but not because it was
 35   V, 30|          not because it was this subject, or the time this time,
 36   V, 30|     exists,-not in virtue of the subject’s nature, however, but of
 37  VI, 4 |      judgement affirms where the subject and predicate really are
 38  VI, 4 |   attaches or removes either the subject’s "what" or its having a
 39 VII, 1 |        always, and is always the subject of doubt, viz. what being
 40 VII, 4 |         may fail to be true of a subject propter se, and one of these
 41 VII, 4 |         the other because in the subject another determinant is combined
 42 VII, 4 |       attribute is asserted of a subject other than itself, the complex
 43 VII, 4 |        imply not merely that the subject participates in the attribute
 44 VII, 4 |        attribute belongs to this subject; or instead of a simple
 45 VII, 5 |       formula or the name of the subject of the particular attribute,
 46 VII, 7 |     knowledge of it. The healthy subject is produced as the result
 47 VII, 7 |     since this is health, if the subject is to be healthy this must
 48 VII, 7 |       mean, for instance, if the subject is to be healthy his bodily
 49 VII, 7 |        from a man that a healthy subject is produced). And so the
 50 VII, 7 |    produced). And so the healthy subject is not said to he an invalid,
 51 VII, 12|      when it does belong and the subject, man, has a certain attribute;
 52 VII, 13|          13~Let us return to the subject of our inquiry, which is
 53 VII, 13|     which is not predicable of a subject, but the universal is predicable
 54 VII, 13|  universal is predicable of some subject always.~But perhaps the
 55 VII, 15|      which can belong to another subject; e.g. if another thing with
 56 VIII, 4|       i.e. what is the proximate subject? The heart or some other
 57 VIII, 4|  affection-that of the proximate subject, not of the whole animal?
 58 VIII, 4|         process in the proximate subject is this due?~
 59  IX, 1 |      potency belongs to the same subject and refers to the same process
 60  IX, 7 |         is not a "this". For the subject or substratum is differentiated
 61  IX, 7 |         musical" or "pale". (The subject is called, when music comes
 62  IX, 7 |        is so, then, the ultimate subject is a substance; but when
 63  IX, 7 |       and a "this", the ultimate subject is matter and material substance.
 64  IX, 8 |       the corn and to the seeing subject the matter and the seed
 65  IX, 8 |          seeing is in the seeing subject and that of theorizing in
 66  IX, 8 |     theorizing in the theorizing subject and the life is in the soul (
 67  IX, 8 |    capable of being present in a subject cannot be present, everything
 68  IX, 10|       case there is truth if the subject and the attribute are really
 69   X, 4 |       some contraries have their subject defined, others have not.
 70   X, 5 |       meanings and the recipient subject is not one; but that which
 71   X, 6 |         not right in leaving the subject with the statement that "
 72  XI, 1 |    science; for this is just the subject which it investigates. It
 73  XI, 5 |        truly made about the same subject. Those, then, who are to
 74  XI, 5 |      negations truly of the same subject. Further, if the affirmation
 75  XI, 6 |        truly made about the same subject at one time, nor can contrary
 76  XI, 6 |   predicated of one and the same subject, of which one of the contraries
 77  XI, 6 | contraries is predicated. If the subject is white we shall be wrong
 78  XI, 6 |        be predicated of the same subject; for when Anaxagoras says
 79  XI, 10|          and not predicated of a subject). Therefore it is either
 80  XI, 10|          infinity belongs to its subject incidentally. But if so,
 81  XI, 12|         1) movement might be the subject moved, as a man is moved
 82  XI, 12|  impossible; for change is not a subject. Or (2) some other subject
 83  XI, 12|       subject. Or (2) some other subject might change from change
 84 XII, 1 |                            1~The subject of our inquiry is substance;
 85 XII, 1 |       kinds of substance are the subject of physics (for they imply
 86 XII, 7 |          then in so far as it is subject to change, in this respect
 87 XII, 8 |        special discussion of the subject; for those who speak of
 88 XII, 8 |         however must discuss the subject, starting from the presuppositions
 89 XII, 8 |          if those who study this subject form an opinion contrary
 90 XIII, 1|        opinions are held on this subject; it is said that the objects
 91 XIII, 1|       special sense. So that the subject of our discussion will be
 92 XIII, 3|   science has the healthy as its subject), but with that which is
 93 XIII, 3|       but with that which is the subject of each science-with the
 94 XIII, 3|    always implies conduct as its subject, while the beautiful is
 95 XIII, 4|   Democritus only touched on the subject to a small extent, and defined,
 96 XIII, 4|    something not predicated of a subject. (By "being shared in incidentally"
 97 XIV, 1 |       that it is predicable of a subject, i.e. that its being white
 98 XIV, 1 |         is absurd, for then that subject will be prior. But all things
 99 XIV, 1 | contraries involve an underlying subject; a subject, then, must be
100 XIV, 1 |         an underlying subject; a subject, then, must be present in
101 XIV, 1 |       are always predicable of a subject, and none can exist apart,
102 XIV, 1 |          because all belong to a subject which is one and the same
103 XIV, 3 |          things could not be the subject of the sciences. But we