Book, Paragraph

 1 III, 1 |         and (3) if the science in question deals with substance, whether
 2 III, 1 |         Further (11) there is the question which is hardest of all
 3 III, 2 |        knowledge of the object in question? The same thing may have
 4 III, 2 |        previous discussion of the question which of the sciences should
 5 III, 2 |        causes, it is a disputable question whether they are the object
 6 III, 2 |         other such premisses:-the question is whether the same science
 7 III, 2 |          This is a very difficult question.~(4) Further, must we say
 8 III, 2 |           We might also raise the question, with reference to which
 9 III, 4 |           might ask the following question also about the first principles.
10 III, 5 |                          5~(14) A question connected with these is
11 III, 6 |       general one might raise the question why after all, besides perceptible
12 III, 6 |        connected with this is the question whether the elements exist
13  IV, 2 |           absence of the thing in question, while in privation there
14  IV, 2 |         each of the predicates in question, saying how they are related
15  IV, 4 |         thought to be begging the question, but if another person is
16  IV, 4 |       take to be a begging of the question), but that he shall say
17  IV, 4 |        not-man"; but the point in question is not this, whether the
18  IV, 4 |     opponent will only answer our question.~And if, when one asks the
19  IV, 4 |         And if, when one asks the question simply, he adds the contradictories,
20  IV, 4 |           he is not answering the question. For there is nothing to
21  IV, 4 |        must not, in answering the question whether this is a man, add
22  IV, 4 |       might say this was the very question at issue.~Again, is he in
23  IV, 5 |    reality is such as the view in question supposes, all will be right
24  IV, 5 |        our opponents’ raising the question whether magnitudes are as
25  IV, 5 |     weighty, for instance, on the question whether a man will get well
26  IV, 5 |        the object of the sense in question, are not equally authoritative,
27  IV, 6 |        are like puzzling over the question whether we are now asleep
28  VI, 1 |   similarly the sciences omit the question whether the genus with which
29  VI, 1 |           For one might raise the question whether first philosophy
30  VI, 2 |          the accidental; e.g. the question whether "musical" and "lettered"
31  VI, 2 |         as our starting-point the question whether there is nothing
32  VI, 4 |         allocation; it is another question, how it happens that we
33 VII, 1 |          one might even raise the question whether the words "to walk", "
34 VII, 1 |        quality is.~And indeed the question which was raised of old
35 VII, 1 |        what being is, is just the question, what is substance? For
36 VII, 3 |         to those who consider the question thus matter alone must seem
37 VII, 5 |               5~It is a difficult question, if one denies that a formula
38 VII, 6 |         to this position, and the question whether Socrates and to
39 VII, 6 |         standpoint from which the question would be asked, or in that
40 VII, 9 |                             9~The question might be raised, why some
41 VII, 10|        the part of the thing, the question is already being asked whether
42 VII, 10|       more clearly, taking up the question again. The parts of the
43 VII, 10|        inquiry by saying that the question cannot be answered simply.
44 VII, 10|      particular instance, and the question must not be answered simply.
45 VII, 11|                        11~Another question is naturally raised, viz.
46 VII, 11|          people already raise the question even in the case of the
47 VII, 11|       pointed out, then, that the question of definitions contains
48 VII, 17|            to give meaning to the question "why") the fact or the existence
49 VII, 17|       short and easy way with the question). But we can inquire why
50 VII, 17|      something given, clearly the question is why the matter is some
51 VIII, 3|          a single thing. But this question, while important for another
52 VIII, 5|        There is difficulty in the question how the matter of each thing
53 VIII, 5|            but the corruptions in question are accidental, and it is
54 VIII, 6|           the other actually, the question will no longer be thought
55 VIII, 6|   definitory formula, so that the question is, what is the cause of
56 VIII, 6|     participation", and raise the question, what is the cause of participation
57  IX, 5 |     appropriate to the potency in question, the one must act and the
58  IX, 5 |     appropriate to the potency in question. Therefore everything which
59  IX, 5 |         And it has the potency in question when the passive object
60  IX, 10|         be in error regarding the question what a thing is, save in
61   X, 2 |          exists. This is the very question that we reviewed in our
62   X, 5 |      contrary, we might raise the question how the one is opposed to
63   X, 5 |         might both have come, the question would have been absurd;
64   X, 5 |           the two":-if, then, the question "whether" is always concerned
65   X, 7 |       have less of the quality in question than the one contrary and
66   X, 9 |             9~One might raise the question, why woman does not differ
67   X, 9 |     belong to it qua animal. This question is almost the same as the
68  XI, 1 | principles; but one might ask the question whether Wisdom is to be
69  XI, 1 |       general one might raise the question, to what kind of science
70  XI, 1 |   subjects.~One might discuss the question whether the science we are
71  XI, 2 |         the first principles, the question arises, how are we to suppose
72  XI, 3 |         some contraries raise the question, how they can be privately
73  XI, 3 |          to be solved,-I mean the question how there can be a single
74  XI, 7 |       object.~One might raise the question whether the science of being
75  XI, 10|      elements. For apart from the question how any of them could be
76 XII, 2 |      another.~One might raise the question from what sort of non-being
77 XII, 4 |           For one might raise the question whether the principles and
78 XII, 8 |        But we must not ignore the question whether we have to suppose
79 XII, 8 |        situated below the star in question; for only thus can all the
80 XII, 9 |        things observed by us, the question how it must be situated
81 XII, 9 |         of its thought.~A further question is left-whether the object
82 XIII, 2|         time that the doctrine in question is an artificial one, has
83 XIII, 3|   included in the premisses.~Each question will be best investigated
84 XIII, 4|          led to it because on the question about the truth of things
85 XIII, 5|         all one might discuss the question what in the world the Forms
86 XIII, 7|         they will admit that this question itself affords some difficulty-whether,
87 XIII, 9|           all one might press the question "if each unit is one, what
88 XIV, 1 |      potentially of the nature in question; but the relative is neither
89 XIV, 2 |         is generated or many.~The question evidently is, how being,
90 XIV, 2 |       They should have asked this question also, how relative terms
91 XIV, 2 |           s attention also on the question, regarding the numbers,
92 XIV, 4 |  difficulty, are contained in the question how the elements and the
93 XIV, 4 |       present day, who answer the question in the negative, and say
94 XIV, 6 |          One might also raise the question what the good is that things