Book, Paragraph

 1  II, 1 |       cause; and a thing has a quality in a higher degree than
 2  II, 1 |       virtue of it the similar quality belongs to the other things
 3 III, 2 |      who knows its quantity or quality or what it can by nature
 4  IV, 4 |     that which has more of any quality is nearer the norm, there
 5  IV, 5 |     for that which is losing a quality has something of that which
 6  IV, 5 |      change in quantity and in quality. Grant that in quantity
 7  IV, 5 |       sense disagree about the quality, but only about that to
 8  IV, 5 |        about that to which the quality belongs. I mean, for instance,
 9   V, 4 |        quantity, though not of quality.-(4) "Nature" means the
10   V, 7 |     the subject is, others its quality, others quantity, others
11   V, 9 |     different, and those whose quality is one; and that which shares
12   V, 14|                            14~"Quality" means (1) the differentia
13   V, 14|      is an animal of a certain quality because he is two-footed,
14   V, 14|      is a figure of particular quality because it is without angles,-
15   V, 14|     essential differentia is a quality.-This, then, is one meaning
16   V, 14|     the numbers have a certain quality, e.g. the composite numbers
17   V, 14|    numbers besides quantity is quality; for the essence of each
18   V, 14|  bodies are said to alter. (4) Quality in respect of virtue and
19   V, 14|     general, of evil and good.~Quality, then, seems to have practically
20   V, 14|       more proper. The primary quality is the differentia of the
21   V, 14|       essence, and of this the quality in numbers is a part; for
22   V, 14|         Good and evil indicate quality especially in living things,
23   V, 15|      one; those are like whose quality is one; those are equal
24   V, 21|         Affection" means (1) a quality in respect of which a thing
25   V, 28|       which the differentia or quality belongs is the substratum,
26   V, 28|      signify essence, others a quality, others the other categories
27  VI, 2 |  predication (e.g. the "what", quality, quantity, place, time,
28  VI, 4 |        or its having a certain quality or quantity or something
29 VII, 1 |       another sense it means a quality or quantity or one of the
30 VII, 1 |        For when we say of what quality a thing is, we say that
31 VII, 1 |   rather than when we know its quality, its quantity, or its place;
32 VII, 1 |       what the quantity or the quality is.~And indeed the question
33 VII, 4 |        each category, e.g. for quality, quantity, time, place,
34 VII, 4 |      the predicates, quantity, quality, and the like. For as "is"
35 VII, 4 |      categories. For even of a quality we might ask what it is,
36 VII, 4 |        ask what it is, so that quality also is a "what a thing
37 VII, 4 |      non-existent; so too with quality.~We must no doubt inquire
38 VII, 4 |    sense, but the essence of a quality or of a quantity. For it
39 VII, 4 |       a quantity, in another a quality. And so there can be a formula
40 VII, 6 |        to which the accidental quality belongs, and the accidental
41 VII, 6 |    belongs, and the accidental quality, are white, so that in a
42 VII, 7 |        of some size or of some quality or somewhere.~Now natural
43 VII, 9 |  classes alike, i.e. quantity, quality, and the other categories.
44 VII, 9 |       substance and in that of quality and quantity and the other
45 VII, 9 |   categories likewise; for the quality does not come to be, but
46 VII, 9 |       be, but the wood of that quality, and the quantity does not
47 VII, 9 |        is not necessary that a quality or quantity should pre-exist
48 VII, 10|      which of the two has this quality. But man and horse and terms
49 VII, 13|       what is a "this", but of quality; for that which is not substance,
50 VII, 13|        not substance, i.e. the quality, will then be prior to substance
51 VIII, 6|   viscosity or some other such quality. And a definition is a set
52 VIII, 6|    being-individual substance, quality, or quantity (and so neither "
53  IX, 1 |        said to be-quantity and quality and the like; for all will
54  IX, 1 | divided into individual thing, quality, and quantity, and is in
55  IX, 1 |        which has not a certain quality and (2) that which might
56  IX, 1 |  things which naturally have a quality lose it by violence, we
57  IX, 8 |        place or of quantity or quality; "in the full sense" means "
58  IX, 8 |       potentially of a certain quality or in a certain place);
59   X, 1 |      which is simple either in quality or in quantity. Now where
60   X, 1 |      quantity, and secondly of quality. And some things will be
61   X, 1 |        they are indivisible in quality; and so that which is one
62   X, 2 |        what a thing is" nor in quality, but is related to them
63   X, 2 |        apart from substance or quality or quantity); and that to
64   X, 3 |   Other things, if they have a quality that is in form one and
65   X, 7 |       it will have less of the quality in question than the one
66   X, 7 |       that which has more of a quality than one thing and less
67   X, 7 |       less respectively of the quality. And since there are no
68  XI, 6 |       not endure in respect of quality? For the assertion of contradictory
69  XI, 6 |         But essence depends on quality, and this is of determinate
70  XI, 9 |     privation"; and as regards quality one kind is "white" and
71  XI, 12|       classified as substance, quality, place, acting or being
72  XI, 12|     three kinds of movement-of quality, of quantity, of place.
73  XI, 12|      movement is in respect of quality and quantity and place;
74  XI, 12|      admits of contrariety. By quality I mean not that which is
75  XI, 12|      even the differentia is a quality), but the passive quality,
76  XI, 12|      quality), but the passive quality, in virtue of which a thing
77 XII, 1 |     first, and is succeeded by quality, and then by quantity. At
78 XII, 2 |        of the "what" or of the quality or of the quantity or of
79 XIII, 7|     neither in quantity nor in quality do we see unit differing
80 XIII, 8|       either in quantity or in quality; and neither of these seems
81 XIII, 8|     neither can they differ in quality. For no attribute can attach
82 XIII, 8|      them; for even to numbers quality is said to belong after
83 XIII, 8|  belong after quantity. Again, quality could not come to them either
84 XIII, 8|    dyad; for the former has no quality, and the latter gives quantity;
85 XIV, 1 |      all cases, in qualities a quality, in quantities a quantity (
86 XIV, 1 | substance, and is posterior to quality and quantity; and the relative
87 XIV, 1 |      diminution, in respect of quality alteration, in respect of
88 XIV, 2 |        that it is of a certain quality, sometimes that it is of
89 XIV, 2 |         not being of a certain quality, "not being three cubits
90 XIV, 2 |    kind of being as "what" and quality also are.~They should have
91 XIV, 4 |      self-sufficient this very quality—self-sufficiency and self-maintenance—