Book, Paragraph

 1   I, 1  |          gained by experience one universal judgement about a class
 2   I, 1  |    experience, and recognizes the universal but does not know the individual
 3 III, 1  |        whether the principles are universal or like individual things,
 4 III, 2  |        prior? The axioms are most universal and are principles of all
 5 III, 3  |          the things that are more universal must be supposed to be more
 6 III, 4  |       numerically one, and by the universal we mean that which is predicable
 7 III, 4  |     substance; for these are most universal of all, and if there is
 8 III, 6  |         also ask whether they are universal or what we call individuals.
 9 III, 6  |          individuals. If they are universal, they will not be substances;
10 III, 6  |  principles are universals, these universal. Therefore if there is to
11  IV, 2  |           being or unity is not a universal and the same in every instance
12  IV, 3  |           to him whose inquiry is universal and deals with primary substance.
13   V, 3  |           the facts that the most universal things are elements (because
14   V, 3  |          the so-called genera are universal and indivisible (for there
15   V, 3  |         because the genus is more universal; for where the differentia
16   V, 6  |   predicated of a genus or of any universal name, e.g. if one says that
17   V, 9  |        same as "the musical" (for universal attributes belong to things
18  VI, 1  |       whether first philosophy is universal, or deals with one genus,
19  VI, 1  |   particular kind of thing, while universal mathematics applies alike
20  VI, 1  |          be first philosophy, and universal in this way, because it
21 VII, 3  |          both the essence and the universal and the genus, are thought
22 VII, 10 |      particular matter treated as universal; and as regards the individual,
23 VII, 10 |         and the formula is of the universal; for "being a circle" is
24 VII, 10 |        recognized by means of the universal formula. But matter is unknowable
25 VII, 11 |          for definition is of the universal and of the form. If then
26 VII, 11 |          will not be parts of the universal circle, but will be parts
27 VII, 11 |    individual is analogous to the universal in its composition.~Whether
28 VII, 13 |         substance, so also is the universal. About two of these we have
29 VII, 13 |         the complete reality. The universal also is thought by some
30 VII, 13 |         seems impossible that any universal term should be the name
31 VII, 13 |         to anything else; but the universal is common, since that is
32 VII, 13 |      common, since that is called universal which is such as to belong
33 VII, 13 |  predicable of a subject, but the universal is predicable of some subject
34 VII, 13 |           always.~But perhaps the universal, while it cannot be substance
35 VII, 13 |  substance; for none the less the universal will be the substance of
36 VII, 13 |         follow once more; for the universal, e.g. "animal", will be
37 VII, 13 |  standpoints, it is plain that no universal attribute is a substance,
38 VII, 13 |           of universals because a universal indicates a "such", not
39 VII, 16 |          time; so that clearly no universal exists apart from its individuals.~
40 VII, 16 |           some.-Clearly, then, no universal term is the name of a substance,
41 VIII, 1 |          various spccies, and the universal than the particulars. And
42 VIII, 1 |         particulars. And with the universal and the genus the Ideas
43 VIII, 1 |         Further, too, neither the universal nor the genus is a substance;
44   X, 1  |        and the individual and the universal. And all these are one because
45   X, 2  |          indefinite.~If, then, no universal can be a substance, as has
46   X, 2  |      being and unity are the most universal of all predicates. Therefore,
47   X, 10 |          the same time if it is a universal (e.g. man can be both pale
48  XI, 2  |            but substance is not a universal, but is rather a "this"-
49  XI, 7  |        being is to be regarded as universal or not. Each of the mathematical
50  XI, 7  |  determinate class of things, but universal mathematics applies alike
51  XI, 7  |          and prior to physics and universal because it is prior.~
52  XI, 10 |           number.~This inquiry is universal; but that the infinite is
53 XII, 5  |        causes can be expressed in universal terms, and some cannot.
54 XII, 5  |    proximate in potentiality. The universal causes, then, of which we
55 XII, 5  |          universally, there is no universal man, but Peleus is the originative
56 XII, 5  |         from mine, while in their universal definition they are the
57 XIII, 2 |    mathematical theorems that are universal, extending beyond these
58 XIII, 3 |                 3~For just as the universal propositions of mathematics
59 XIII, 4 |           to raise the problem of universal definition (for of the physicists
60 XIII, 4 |  Socrates-inductive arguments and universal definition, both of which
61 XIII, 8 |        prior, but inasmuch as the universal and the form is prior, the
62 XIII, 8 |            they say; but both the universal, and the particular or the
63 XIII, 8 |       this is impossible. For the universal is one as form or substance,
64 XIII, 8 |      mathematics and from that of universal definitions, so that (1)
65 XIII, 8 |     because they were seeking the universal they treated the unity which
66 XIII, 9 |   particular animal. True, if the universal is not separable from sensible
67 XIII, 9 |          same time make the Ideas universal and again treat them as
68 XIII, 9 |     described their substances as universal combined these two characteristics
69 XIII, 9 |       them remained, but that the universal was apart from these and
70 XIII, 9 |          results; for without the universal it is not possible to get
71 XIII, 10|       they are individual and not universal, (a) real things will be
72 XIII, 10|     syllables, since they are not universal and the same in form but
73 XIII, 10|        knowable; for they are not universal, and knowledge is of universals.
74 XIII, 10|         But if the principles are universal, either the substances composed
75 XIII, 10|         composed of them are also universal, or non-substance will be
76 XIII, 10|       prior to substance; for the universal is not a substance, but
77 XIII, 10|           element or principle is universal, and the element or principle
78 XIII, 10|    statement that an knowledge is universal, so that the principles
79 XIII, 10| principles of things must also be universal and not separate substances,
80 XIII, 10|        potency, being, as matter, universal and indefinite, deals with
81 XIII, 10|        indefinite, deals with the universal and indefinite; but the
82 XIII, 10|           per accidens sight sees universal colour, because this individual
83 XIII, 10|         if the principles must be universal, what is derived from them
84 XIII, 10|    derived from them must also be universal, as in demonstrations; and
85 XIII, 10|           in a sense knowledge is universal, and in a sense it is not.~
86 XIV, 1  |        and others name rather the universal character common to these – "
87 XIV, 1  |          does; for number is more universal than as the exceeding and
88 XIV, 1  |         and the exceeded are more universal than the great and the small.