Book, Paragraph

 1  II, 1 |   practical men do not study the eternal, but what is relative and
 2  II, 1 |          Hence the principles of eternal things must be always most
 3  II, 2 |      that the first cause, being eternal, should be destroyed; for
 4 III, 2 |      things except that they are eternal while the latter are perishable.
 5 III, 2 |        were positing nothing but eternal men, nor are the Platonists
 6 III, 2 |        Forms anything other than eternal sensible things.~Further,
 7 III, 4 |         Further, nothing will be eternal or unmovable; for all perceptible
 8 III, 4 |          But if there is nothing eternal, neither can there be a
 9 III, 4 |        can gods who need food be eternal?-But into the subtleties
10 III, 4 |      elements are, some of them, eternal in nature, while others
11   V, 5 |          are any things that are eternal and unmovable, nothing compulsory
12   V, 30|    accidents of this sort may be eternal, but no accident of the
13  VI, 1 |      there is something which is eternal and immovable and separable,
14  VI, 1 |           Now all causes must be eternal, but especially these; for
15  VI, 2 |  everything which is, but is not eternal, has come to be", with the
16  VI, 2 |          be always, or are there eternal things? This must be considered
17 VII, 2 |       but others think there are eternal substances which are more
18 VII, 15|  two-footed. (And in the case of eternal entities this is even necessary,
19 VII, 15|    escapes notice in the case of eternal things, especially those
20 VII, 16|    suppose, would they have been eternal substances apart from those
21 VIII, 3|       This, then, must either be eternal or it must be destructible
22 VIII, 4|          the case of natural but eternal substances another account
23  IX, 8 |          to the actuality of the eternal prime mover.~But (b) actuality
24  IX, 8 |         stricter sense also; for eternal things are prior in substance
25  IX, 8 |        perishable things, and no eternal thing exists potentially.
26  IX, 8 |    nothing would exist. Nor does eternal movement, if there be such,
27  IX, 8 | potentially; and, if there is an eternal mobile, it is not in motion
28  IX, 9 |      from the beginning, i.e. in eternal things, there is nothing
29  IX, 10|         implied that the fact is eternal.~
30  XI, 2 |         hand to set up other and eternal substances equal in number
31  XI, 2 |  perishable, so that there is no eternal substance at all which can
32  XI, 2 |        unless there is something eternal and independent and permanent?~
33  XI, 2 |         things, and the same for eternal and for perishable things,
34  XI, 2 |          under the principle are eternal, and others are not eternal;
35  XI, 2 |      eternal, and others are not eternal; this is paradoxical. But
36  XI, 2 |        perishable and another of eternal things, we shall be in a
37  XI, 2 |       things, as well as that of eternal, is eternal; for why, if
38  XI, 2 |      well as that of eternal, is eternal; for why, if the principle
39  XI, 2 |         why, if the principle is eternal, are not the things that
40  XI, 2 |         under the principle also eternal? But if it is perishable
41  XI, 2 |   independent? Yet we expect the eternal and primary principles to
42 XII, 1 |         which one subdivision is eternal and another is perishable;
43 XII, 2 |         different matter; and of eternal things those which are not
44 XII, 6 |          that there should be an eternal unmovable substance. For
45 XII, 6 |        gained even if we suppose eternal substances, as the believers
46 XII, 6 |   potency; for there will not be eternal movement, since that which
47 XII, 6 |         matter; for they must be eternal, if anything is eternal.
48 XII, 6 |          eternal, if anything is eternal. Therefore they must be
49 XII, 6 |         This is why some suppose eternal actuality-e.g. Leucippus
50 XII, 6 |          For it was the cause of eternal uniformity; and something
51 XII, 6 |        together are the cause of eternal variety. This, accordingly,
52 XII, 7 |         the first heaven must be eternal. There is therefore also
53 XII, 7 |       without being moved, being eternal, substance, and actuality.
54 XII, 7 |  actuality is life most good and eternal. We say therefore that God
55 XII, 7 |      that God is a living being, eternal, most good, so that life
56 XII, 7 |          duration continuous and eternal belong to God; for this
57 XII, 7 |          is a substance which is eternal and unmovable and separate
58 XII, 8 |         but produces the primary eternal and single movement. But
59 XII, 8 |         in itself unmovable, and eternal movement must be produced
60 XII, 8 |         be produced by something eternal and a single movement by
61 XII, 8 |         of the planets-which are eternal (for a body which moves
62 XII, 8 |       which moves in a circle is eternal and unresting; we have proved
63 XII, 8 |          unmovable in itself and eternal. For the nature of the stars
64 XII, 8 |       the nature of the stars is eternal just because it is a certain
65 XII, 8 |      substance, and the mover is eternal and prior to the moved,
66 XII, 8 |       stars, and in their nature eternal, and in themselves unmovable,
67 XII, 8 |         which is perceptible but eternal, but the other mathematical
68 XII, 10|        world, then, would not be eternal. But it is; one of these
69 XIII, 1|       any which is immovable and eternal, and, if there is, what
70 XIII, 4|        these be of this world or eternal.~Again, of the ways in which
71 XIII, 4|      itself", it shares also in "eternal", but incidentally; for "
72 XIII, 4|        the double" happens to be eternal.) Therefore the Forms will
73 XIII, 4|       the 2’s which are many but eternal, and not the same in the "
74 XIII, 5|         either to those that are eternal or to those that come into
75 XIII, 5|         so even if Socrates were eternal. And there will be several
76 XIV, 2 |       inquire generally, whether eternal things can consist of elements.
77 XIV, 2 |     limit. They cannot, then, be eternal, since that which is capable
78 XIV, 2 |   capable of not existing is not eternal, as we had occasion to show
79 XIV, 2 | universally-that no substance is eternal unless it is actuality-and
80 XIV, 2 |          underlies substance, no eternal substance can have elements
81 XIV, 3 |    generation to things that are eternal, or rather this is one of
82 XIV, 4 |        that which is primary and eternal and most self-sufficient
83 XIV, 6 |  analogies or in finding them in eternal things, since they can be