Book, Paragraph

 1 III, 1 |             also with the essential attributes of substances. Further,
 2 III, 1 |          must discuss the essential attributes of these themselves; and
 3 III, 1 |             and Plato said, are not attributes of something else but the
 4 III, 2 |           them must be demonstrable attributes and others must be axioms (
 5 III, 2 |           subject and prove certain attributes. Therefore it follows that
 6 III, 2 |       Therefore it follows that all attributes that are proved must belong
 7 III, 2 |            science dealing with all attributes. For ever demonstrative
 8 III, 2 |          some subject its essential attributes, starting from the common
 9 III, 2 |           investigate the essential attributes of one class of things,
10 III, 2 |             to another; so that the attributes do so too, whether they
11 III, 2 |            alone or also with their attributes? I mean for instance, if
12 III, 2 |          know these and to know the attributes of each of these classes (
13 III, 2 |          each of these classes (the attributes about which the mathematical
14 III, 2 |       science that investigates the attributes of substance? This is a
15  IV, 1 | investigates being as being and the attributes which belong to this in
16  IV, 2 |             qua number has peculiar attributes, such as oddness and evenness,
17  IV, 2 |            being qua being, and the attributes which belong to it qua being,
18  IV, 2 |           substances but also their attributes, both those above named
19  IV, 3 |            impossible that contrary attributes should belong at the same
20  IV, 4 |            enumerate its accidental attributes, which are infinite in number;
21  IV, 4 |          For they must say that all attributes are accidents, and that
22  IV, 4 |           of anything, but that all attributes are accidental; for this
23  IV, 5 |          they can change, since all attributes belong already to all subjects.~
24   V, 7 |             last two mean that both attributes are accidents of the same
25   V, 9 |             musical" (for universal attributes belong to things in virtue
26   V, 9 |           like" which have the same attributes in every respect, and those
27   V, 9 |           and those which have more attributes the same than different,
28   V, 9 |           the more important of the attributes (each of them one of two
29   V, 10|     dissolution take place; and the attributes that cannot be present at
30   V, 10|             is applied (1) to those attributes differing in genus which
31   V, 10|           the most different of the attributes in the same recipient subject, (
32   V, 11|             who is musical.~(3) The attributes of prior things are called
33   V, 13|           light, and all other such attributes. And also great and small,
34   V, 13|             are by their own nature attributes of what is quantitative;
35   V, 13|           things of which these are attributes are divisible. I mean not
36   V, 18|            of himself.-(5) Whatever attributes belong to a thing alone,
37   V, 22|        something has not one of the attributes which a thing might naturally
38   V, 30|           Therefore since there are attributes and they attach to subjects,
39  VI, 1 |             cogently, the essential attributes of the genus with which
40  VI, 1 |       being-both what it is and the attributes which belong to it qua being.~
41  VI, 2 |            does not produce all the attributes that come into being along
42  VI, 2 |           at producing any of these attributes. And in the same way the
43  VI, 2 |      geometer does not consider the attributes which attach thus to figures,
44 VII, 5 |     quantity, and as all so-called "attributes propter se" attach to their
45 VII, 5 |            their subjects. And such attributes are those in which is involved
46 VII, 12|          can be made out of all the attributes of a thing. But surely all
47 VII, 12|           thing. But surely all the attributes in the definition must be
48 VII, 14|    conclusion follows; for contrary attributes will belong at the same
49 VII, 15|            say that perhaps all the attributes taken apart may belong to
50 VII, 15|       people err not only by adding attributes whose removal the sun would
51 VII, 15|          but also by the mention of attributes which can belong to another
52 VII, 15|       another thing with the stated attributes comes into existence, clearly
53 VIII, 2|            others some other of the attributes we have named. And so, of
54  IX, 7 |           already got such and such attributes, in this state it is already
55   X, 5 |             nature as to have these attributes.~The equal, then, is that
56   X, 10|        perishableness is one of the attributes that belong of necessity
57   X, 10| imperishableness also; for both are attributes which are present of necessity.
58  XI, 1 |             only or also with their attributes? If in the case of attributes
59  XI, 1 |       attributes? If in the case of attributes demonstration is possible,
60  XI, 1 |   demonstrative, the science of the attributes is Wisdom, but if as dealing
61  XI, 3 |           three dimensions, and the attributes of these qua quantitative
62  XI, 3 |           positions of some and the attributes of these, and the commensurabilities
63  XI, 3 |            regard to being. For the attributes of this in so far as it
64  XI, 3 |             sophistic deal with the attributes of things that are, but
65  XI, 4 |             for physics studies the attributes and the principles of the
66 XII, 4 |        itself potentially has these attributes; and substances comprise
67 XIII, 2|             not coextensive. For if attributes do not exist apart from
68 XIII, 3|           character; e.g. there are attributes peculiar to the animal qua
69 XIII, 3|              so that there are also attributes which belong to things merely
70 XIII, 3|         numbers; but the latter are attributes proper to the former. And
71 XIII, 3|             Therefore if we suppose attributes separated from their fellow
72 XIII, 3|         separated from their fellow attributes and make any inquiry concerning
73 XIII, 3|           him even apart from these attributes. Thus, then, geometers speak
74 XIII, 3|             mention them, but prove attributes which are their results
75 XIII, 9|           long and short", &c., are attributes of magnitude, but magnitude
76 XIV, 3 | Pythagoreans, because they saw many attributes of numbers belonging te
77 XIV, 3 |       consist. But why? Because the attributes of numbers are present in
78 XIV, 3 |            they existed apart their attributes would not have been present
79 XIV, 3 |            in sensible things their attributes are present in sensible