Book, Paragraph

 1   I, 1  |        reason is that experience is knowledge of individuals, art of universals,
 2  II, 1  |         philosophy should be called knowledge of the truth. For the end
 3  II, 1  |          For the end of theoretical knowledge is truth, while that of
 4  II, 1  |             while that of practical knowledge is action (for even if they
 5  II, 2  |             unanalysable terms. And knowledge becomes impossible; for
 6  II, 2  |       infinite in number, then also knowledge would have been impossible;
 7  II, 3  |           elements prevail over our knowledge about them, owing to habit.
 8  II, 3  |            to seek at the same time knowledge and the way of attaining
 9  II, 3  |            and the way of attaining knowledge; and it is not easy to get
10 III, 2  |             has the most scientific knowledge of the object in question?
11 III, 2  |             highest sense object of knowledge, the science of substance
12 III, 2  |        cases also we think that the knowledge of each even of the things
13 III, 3  |           things. And if to get the knowledge of the species according
14 III, 3  |             are named is to get the knowledge of things, the genera are
15 III, 4  |          then is it possible to get knowledge of the infinite individuals?
16 III, 4  |        sense, and there will not be knowledge of anything, unless we say
17 III, 4  |            we say that sensation is knowledge. Further, nothing will be
18 III, 4  |           has in him no strife, and knowledge is of the like by the like. "
19 III, 4  |          and the most necessary for knowledge of the truth is whether
20 III, 6  |           are not universals but of knowledge of the principles there
21 III, 6  |             those knowable; for the knowledge of anything is that are
22  IV, 4  |           worse. And if this is not knowledge but opinion, they should
23  IV, 5  |      because these thinkers suppose knowledge to be sensation, and this
24  IV, 5  |         condition they change their knowledge;~For wisdom increases in
25  IV, 5  |          then, if both are forms of knowledge, the real things also are
26   V, 1  |           the beginning both of the knowledge and of the movement of many
27   V, 7  |             which can actualize its knowledge and of that which is actualizing
28   V, 11 |             that which is prior for knowledge is treated as also absolutely
29   V, 15 |        measure, and the knowable to knowledge, and the perceptible to
30   V, 17 |            for this is the limit of knowledge; and if of knowledge, of
31   V, 17 |             of knowledge; and if of knowledge, of the object also. Evidently,
32  VI, 1  |          and separable, clearly the knowledge of it belongs to a theoretical
33 VII, 1  |         definition, (2) in order of knowledge, (3) in time. For (3) of
34 VII, 6  |         other, (a) there will be no knowledge of the former, and (b) the
35 VII, 6  |             good.) For (a) there is knowledge of each thing only when
36 VII, 7  |          formula in the soul or the knowledge of it. The healthy subject
37 VII, 15 |            process, and if, just as knowledge cannot be sometimes knowledge
38 VII, 15 |       knowledge cannot be sometimes knowledge and sometimes ignorance,
39 VII, 15 |         those who have the relevant knowledge, when they have passed from
40 VIII, 6 |       communion", as Lycophron says knowledge is a communion of knowing
41  IX, 2  |             all productive forms of knowledge, are potencies; they are
42  IX, 6  |         exists potentially only for knowledge. For the fact that the process
43  IX, 8  |            that the formula and the knowledge of the one must precede
44  IX, 8  |            the one must precede the knowledge of the other.~(2) In time
45  IX, 8  |            be hard to say about the knowledge, as about the figure in
46   X, 1  |           in intelligibility and in knowledge is indivisible, so that
47   X, 1  |           is a plurality of units.)~Knowledge, also, and perception, we
48   X, 1  |      because they have respectively knowledge and perception, which we
49   X, 6  |            1) as contraries; (2) as knowledge to thing known, a term being
50   X, 6  |            not a number. But though knowledge is similarly spoken of as
51   X, 6  |            out similarly; for while knowledge might be thought to be the
52   X, 6  |         measured, the fact that all knowledge is knowable, but not all
53   X, 6  |             all that is knowable is knowledge, because in a sense knowledge
54   X, 6  |       knowledge, because in a sense knowledge is measured by the knowable.-
55   X, 6  |          sense they are relative as knowledge is to knowable, if plurality
56   X, 7  | intermediate could there be between knowledge and knowable? But between
57  XI, 2  |         raised by the fact that all knowledge is of universals and of
58  XI, 2  |          thing, so that if there is knowledge about the first principles,
59  XI, 7  |        separable and unmovable, the knowledge of it must be different
60  XI, 11 |         things, are unmovable, e.g. knowledge or heat; it is not heat
61  XI, 12 |       changing, now into a state of knowledge, now into one of ignorance.~
62 XII, 9  |             thinking.~But evidently knowledge and perception and opinion
63 XII, 9  |       answer that in some cases the knowledge is the object. In the productive
64 XII, 10 |         Wisdom, i.e. to the highest knowledge; but we are not. For there
65 XII, 10 |            which is contrary to any knowledge leads to an object contrary
66 XII, 10 |       contrary to the object of the knowledge; but what is primary has
67 XIII, 3 |         definition and simpler, our knowledge has more accuracy, i.e.
68 XIII, 4 |            passing away, so that if knowledge or thought is to have an
69 XIII, 4 |     sensible; for there could be no knowledge of things which were in
70 XIII, 4 |         enables people even without knowledge of the essence to speculate
71 XIII, 5 |             wise either towards the knowledge of other things (for they
72 XIII, 9 |           it is not possible to get knowledge, but the separation is the
73 XIII, 10|         they are not universal, and knowledge is of universals. This is
74 XIII, 10|    syllables. The statement that an knowledge is universal, so that the
75 XIII, 10|           in a sense it is not. For knowledge, like the verb "to know",
76 XIII, 10|            But evidently in a sense knowledge is universal, and in a sense