Book, Paragraph

 1 III, 1  |        points to a "knot" in the object; for in so far as our thought
 2 III, 2  |      scientific knowledge of the object in question? The same thing
 3 III, 2  |          is in the highest sense object of knowledge, the science
 4 III, 2  |    question whether they are the object of one science or of more (
 5 III, 2  |       these topics should be the object of one science; for why
 6 III, 4  |    individuals, there will be no object of thought, but all things
 7  IV, 5  |        sensation-at least of the object peculiar to the sense in
 8  IV, 5  |       the sensation of a foreign object and that of the appropriate
 9  IV, 5  |          that of the appropriate object, or that of a kindred object
10  IV, 5  |     object, or that of a kindred object and that of the object of
11  IV, 5  |   kindred object and that of the object of the sense in question,
12  IV, 5  |        the same time of the same object that it simultaneously is "
13  IV, 7  |         never seen.-Again, every object of understanding or reason
14   V, 4  |         movement in each natural object is present in it in virtue
15   V, 4  |    material of which any natural object consists or out of which
16   V, 11 |        place), or to some chance object; and that which is farther
17   V, 17 |          if of knowledge, of the object also. Evidently, therefore, "
18   V, 22 |        and with reference to the object with reference to which,
19 VII, 10 |        not refer to the concrete object. For it is for this reason
20 VII, 17 |          case of being also.~The object of the inquiry is most easily
21 VIII, 1 |   elements of substances are the object of our search. And some
22 VIII, 6 |          but by dealing with one object.-What then, is it that makes
23  IX, 2  |  rational formula applies to one object in virtue of that object’
24  IX, 2  |         object in virtue of that object’s nature, and to the other,
25  IX, 3  |        by the destruction of the object, for that lasts for ever),
26  IX, 5  |   present, and meets the passive object, in the way appropriate
27  IX, 5  |        question when the passive object is present and is in a certain
28  IX, 8  |          doing that which is the object of the science; for he who
29  IX, 10 |        in the other case, if the object is existent it exists in
30  XI, 6  |     under their eye and make the object appear two instead of one
31  XI, 6  | interfere with their eye the one object appears one).~In general,
32  XI, 7  |          in virtue of its proper object.~One might raise the question
33 XII, 3  |       there are kinds of natural object (if there are Forms distinct
34 XII, 7  |           and actuality. And the object of desire and the object
35 XII, 7  |         object of desire and the object of thought move in this
36 XII, 7  |         the apparent good is the object of appetite, and the real
37 XII, 7  |         real good is the primary object of rational wish. But desire
38 XII, 7  |          thought is moved by the object of thought, and one of the
39 XII, 7  |       opposites is in itself the object of thought; and in this,
40 XII, 7  |         shares the nature of the object of thought; for it becomes
41 XII, 7  |       thought; for it becomes an object of thought in coming into
42 XII, 7  |     objects, so that thought and object of thought are the same.
43 XII, 7  |         capable of receiving the object of thought, i.e. the essence,
44 XII, 7  |    active when it possesses this object. Therefore the possession
45 XII, 9  |          something else as their object, and themselves only by
46 XII, 9  |         of thinking and to he an object of thought are not the same
47 XII, 9  |       cases the knowledge is the object. In the productive sciences
48 XII, 9  |      substance or essence of the object, matter omitted, and in
49 XII, 9  |       the act of thinking is the object. Since, then, thought and
50 XII, 9  |     Since, then, thought and the object of thought are not different
51 XII, 9  |       the divine thought and its object will be the same, i.e. the
52 XII, 9  |    thinking will be one with the object of its thought.~A further
53 XII, 9  |     question is left-whether the object of the divine thought is
54 XII, 9  |         which has itself for its object.~
55 XII, 10 |        any knowledge leads to an object contrary to the object of
56 XII, 10 |        an object contrary to the object of the knowledge; but what
57 XIII, 3 |         healthy if it treats its object qua healthy, with man if
58 XIII, 4 |         or thought is to have an object, there must be some other
59 XIII, 4 |     argument that thought has an object when the individual object
60 XIII, 4 |       object when the individual object has perished, there will
61 XIII, 5 |      causes whiteness in a white object by entering into its composition.
62 XIII, 10|  definite, deals with a definite object, being a "this", it deals
63 XIV, 2  |          an indefinite dyad, and object to "the unequal", reasonably