Book, Paragraph

 1  II, 2 |            be the cause of the later terms. For if we had to say which
 2  II, 2 |        impossible that the number of terms should be infinite. For
 3  II, 2 |              should be infinite. For terms of the former kind, being
 4  II, 2 | intermediates, must have an end, and terms of the latter kind change
 5  II, 2 |            comes to the unanalysable terms. And knowledge becomes impossible;
 6 III, 1 |         posterior and all other such terms about which the dialecticians
 7  IV, 2 |             is said to be one, these terms also will have many senses,
 8  IV, 3 |             of those who discuss the terms on which truth should be
 9  IV, 4 |            different; for the former terms are much more different
10  IV, 4 |           for not even more than two terms can be combined in accidental
11  IV, 4 |             in this sense, that both terms are accidental to something
12  IV, 4 |          other kind, so that not all terms will be accidental. There
13  IV, 5 |              if they are correlative terms, this is no less the case.~
14  IV, 7 |             intermediate between the terms of a contradiction, seems
15   V, 3 |         syllogisms, which have three terms and proceed by means of
16   V, 10|          contraries, and to relative terms, and to privation and possession,
17   V, 10|          have many senses, the other terms which are derived from these,
18   V, 15|             perception.~(1) Relative terms of the first kind are numerically
19   V, 15|               Further, some relative terms imply privation of potency,
20   V, 15|        potency, i.e. "incapable" and terms of this sort, e.g. "invisible".~
21   V, 15|           e.g. "invisible".~Relative terms which imply number or potency,
22  VI, 4 |              the various meanings of terms, that "being" has several
23 VII, 5 |       definition, whether any of the terms that are not simple but
24 VII, 5 |             if this is true, coupled terms also, like "odd number",
25 VII, 6 |           same as that of the simple terms. For the extreme terms are
26 VII, 6 |        simple terms. For the extreme terms are not in the same way
27 VII, 6 |             follow, that the extreme terms, the accidents, should turn
28 VII, 6 |               2) the one, so that to terms of the former kind the same
29 VII, 10|       quality. But man and horse and terms which are thus applied to
30 VII, 12|             definition includes more terms. And in general it makes
31 VII, 12|              it includes many or few terms,-nor, therefore, whether
32 VII, 17|          then, in the case of simple terms no inquiry nor teaching
33  IX, 5 |            it has the potency on the terms on which this is a potency
34  IX, 5 |               for it is not on these terms that one has the potency
35  IX, 5 |             potency of doing, on the terms on which one has the potency.~
36  IX, 7 |             result. It is on similar terms that we have what is potentially
37  IX, 10|                               10~The terms "being" and "non-being"
38  IX, 10|       consider what we mean by these terms. It is not because we think
39   X, 1 |               and "one" and all such terms. For this reason, too, "
40   X, 3 |          kinds, and one of these two terms is privative in meaning,
41   X, 4 |              involves, as one of its terms, a privation, but not all
42   X, 5 |         intermediate between its own terms.~It remains, then, that
43   X, 6 |              have said some relative terms are opposed; for inasmuch
44   X, 7 |         others contrary. Of relative terms, those which are not contrary
45   X, 7 |            genus must be composed of terms in which the genus is not
46   X, 10|           have spoken of the general terms themselves, so that it might
47  XI, 3 |          also we use in many senses. Terms are used in this way by
48  XI, 6 |            for the second of the two terms we have put together is
49  XI, 11|           change, because (since the terms are neither contraries nor
50  XI, 12|             of an infinite number of terms there is not a first, the
51 XII, 4 |          substances and for relative terms, and similarly in the case
52 XII, 4 |       elements will proceed relative terms and substances. What then
53 XII, 4 |           not an element in relative terms, nor is any of these an
54 XII, 5 |            be expressed in universal terms, and some cannot. The proximate
55 XII, 5 |        neither generic nor ambiguous terms; and, further, the matters
56 XIII, 9|             not, and whether, of the terms that succeed it, 2 or either
57 XIV, 2 |          question also, how relative terms are many and not one. But