Book, Paragraph

 1  II, 2 |        destruction of either is the generation of the other.~At the same
 2 III, 4 |           which is not. Further, if generation and movement exist there
 3 III, 5 |         been said, the questions of generation and instruction confront
 4  IV, 5 |        movement nor destruction nor generation at all belongs.~And (2)
 5  IV, 5 |          process of destruction and generation; but this is-so to speak-not
 6  IV, 7 |         change intermediate between generation and destruction.-Again,
 7   V, 10|           from which and into which generation and dissolution take place;
 8   V, 11|        without others in respect of generation, e.g. the whole without
 9   V, 28|           or "genus" is used (1) if generation of things which have the
10   V, 28|             lasts" means "while the generation of them goes on continuously".-(
11   V, 28|             reference to continuous generation of the same kind, (2) in
12 VII, 15|            they are capable also of generation), but there is no destruction
13 VII, 15|          destroyed (for there is no generation of it either; the being
14 VII, 15|            this house), but without generation and destruction formulae
15 VIII, 1|         should also have matter for generation and destruction.~The difference
16 VIII, 3|       suffice for an account of the generation and destruction of so-called
17 VIII, 4|            starting-point for their generation, yet there is a matter proper
18  IX, 8 |        sense also, viz. in order of generation and of time, prior to potency.~
19  IX, 9 |        single actuality is later in generation than the corresponding potency). (
20   X, 4 |             the extremes from which generation takes place are the contraries,
21  XI, 11| generation-absolute change absolute generation, and partial change partial
22  XI, 11|          and partial change partial generation; and the change from positive
23  XI, 11|           moved (and if this is so, generation cannot be movement; for
24  XI, 11|          admit to the full that its generation is accidental, yet it is
25  XI, 11|          contrary of destruction is generation. Since every movement is
26  XI, 11|           these those in the way of generation and destruction are not
27  XI, 12|            movement of movement nor generation of generation, nor, in general,
28  XI, 12|          movement nor generation of generation, nor, in general, change
29  XI, 12|         into something. (And so are generation and destruction; only, these
30 XII, 2 |             of "thisness" is simple generation and destruction, and change
31 XII, 2 |          have matter-not matter for generation, however, but for motion
32 XII, 2 |         from what sort of non-being generation proceeds; for "non-being"
33 XII, 3 |          exists apart (nor is there generation and destruction of these
34 XII, 6 |          way. And if there is to be generation and destruction, there must
35 XIII, 2|        magnitude is in the order of generation prior, but in the order
36 XIII, 2|       together?~Again, the modes of generation of the objects of mathematics
37 XIII, 2|           posterior in the order of generation is prior in the order of
38 XIII, 8|       neither odd nor even, but the generation of numbers is always the
39 XIII, 8|            of numbers is always the generation either of an odd or of an
40 XIII, 8|         than 10 itself. There is no generation of the former as one thing,
41 XIII, 8|           the definition, though in generation it is later. How then is
42 XIII, 9|             position or blending or generation? and so on. Above all one
43 XIV, 1 |         that it alone has no proper generation or destruction or movement,
44 XIV, 1 |         respect of substance simple generation and destruction. In respect
45 XIV, 2 |     potential, it is from this that generation proceeds, man from that
46 XIV, 3 |           strange also to attribute generation to things that are eternal,
47 XIV, 3 |          the Pythagoreans attribute generation to them or not; for they
48 XIV, 4 |            thinkers say there is no generation of the odd number, which
49 XIV, 4 |     evidently implies that there is generation of the even; and some present
50 XIV, 4 |         giving their account of the generation of numbers merely to assist
51 XIV, 4 |           necessarily follow, since generation is from contraries, that
52 XIV, 6 |          have much trouble with the generation of numbers and can in no