Book, Paragraph

 1 III, 1 |          and elements of things the genera, or the parts present in
 2 III, 1 |             and (7) if they are the genera, are they the genera that
 3 III, 1 |            the genera, are they the genera that are predicated proximately
 4 III, 1 |         individuals, or the highest genera, e.g. is animal or man the
 5 III, 3 |       principles, whether it is the genera that should be taken as
 6 III, 3 |          does not describe these as genera of existing things. Besides
 7 III, 3 |             things would not be the genera; but if we know each thing
 8 III, 3 |             its definition, and the genera are the principles or starting-points
 9 III, 3 | starting-points of definitions, the genera must also be the principles
10 III, 3 |            knowledge of things, the genera are at least starting-points
11 III, 3 |       things, seem to treat them as genera.~But, again, it is not possible
12 III, 3 |           is one; but definition by genera will be different from that
13 III, 3 |           Besides this, even if the genera are in the highest degree
14 III, 3 |             regard the first of the genera as principles, or those
15 III, 3 |      evidently the uppermost of the genera are the principles; for
16 III, 3 |         things as there are primary genera, so that both being and
17 III, 3 |             unity and being are not genera, neither will they be principles,
18 III, 3 |          they be principles, if the genera are the principles. Again,
19 III, 3 |              will on this theory be genera, down to the indivisible
20 III, 3 |              some are thought to be genera and others are not thought
21 III, 3 |       principles even more than the genera; and if these also are principles,
22 III, 3 |           species is the prior, and genera are divisible into species
23 III, 3 |        kinds of figures; and if the genera of these things do not exist
24 III, 3 |         apart from the species, the genera of other things will scarcely
25 III, 3 |            will scarcely do so; for genera of these things are thought
26 III, 3 |          principles rather than the genera. But again, it is not easy
27 III, 3 |     principles; so that the highest genera would be the principles.~
28 III, 4 |          will be necessary that the genera exist apart from the individuals,
29 III, 4 |           the lowest or the highest genera; but we found by discussion
30  IV, 2 |        being falls immediately into genera; for which reason the sciences
31  IV, 2 |            will correspond to these genera. For the philosopher is
32  IV, 2 |       entirely under these as their genera. It is obvious then from
33   V, 3 |            Now, since the so-called genera are universal and indivisible (
34   V, 3 |   definition of them), some say the genera are elements, and more so
35   V, 6 |           genus above the proximate genera; e.g. the isosceles and
36 VII, 12|             differentiae. The other genera are the first genus and
37   X, 2 |         Therefore, on the one hand, genera are not certain entities
38   X, 2 |             and substance cannot be genera.~Further, the position must
39  XI, 1 |         would deal with the highest genera. These would turn out to
40  XI, 1 |            is to suppose them to be genera, they must be predicable
41  XI, 1 |             we should not make them genera nor principles. Further,
42  XI, 1 |          genus are simpler than the genera (for they are indivisible,
43  XI, 1 |            are indivisible, but the genera are divided into many and
44  XI, 1 |         principles, rather than the genera. But inasmuch as the species
45  XI, 1 |           in the destruction of the genera, the genera are more like
46  XI, 1 |      destruction of the genera, the genera are more like principles;
47  XI, 2 |            from the individuals are genera or species; but the science
48 XII, 1 |       universals as substances (for genera are universals, and these