Book, Paragraph

 1  II, 2 |          had to say which of the three is the cause, we should
 2  IV, 4 |      should not say that two and three are equally even, nor is
 3  IV, 5 |        were mad, and only two or three were well or sane, these
 4   V, 3 |   primary syllogisms, which have three terms and proceed by means
 5   V, 6 |          quantity in all—i.e. in three—dimensions. And, reversing
 6   V, 13|       length; in two breadth, in three depth. Of these, limited
 7   V, 14|          those which have two or three factors); and in general
 8   V, 25|      called in a sense a part of three. It means (b), of the parts
 9   V, 25|         is not, called a part of three.-(2) The elements into which
10   V, 27|       unlike parts (e.g. two and three) as well as like; but in
11  VI, 1 |         us. There must, then, be three theoretical philosophies,
12 VII, 1 |      good or bad, not that it is three cubits long or that it is
13 VII, 1 |         say "white" or "hot" or "three cubits long", but "a man"
14 VIII, 2|         seems to think there are three kinds of difference between
15  IX, 9 |          cases a right angle? If three lines are equal the two
16   X, 5 |         less"); there are always three cases. But it is not a necessary
17  XI, 3 |   sometimes in two, sometimes in three dimensions, and the attributes
18  XI, 4 |      continuous in one or two or three dimensions; but philosophy
19  XI, 7 |       Evidently, then, there are three kinds of theoretical sciences-physics,
20  XI, 11|          Therefore there must be three changes; that from negative
21  XI, 11|          kinds of change are the three named above, and of these
22  XI, 12|          quantity, there must be three kinds of movement-of quality,
23 XII, 1 |         to both, body.~There are three kinds of substance-one that
24 XII, 2 |    proceeds; for "non-being" has three senses. If, then, one form
25 XII, 2 |        the principles, then, are three, two being the pair of contraries
26 XII, 3 |          of these two.~There are three kinds of substance-the matter,
27 XII, 4 |         might say that there are three principles-the form, the
28 XII, 4 | Therefore analogically there are three elements, and four causes
29 XII, 4 |         there will be in a sense three causes, while in a sense
30 XII, 6 |               6~Since there were three kinds of substance, two
31 XII, 8 |        involves, in either case, three spheres, of which the first
32 XIII, 2|        from the sensible solids; three sets of planes apart from
33 XIII, 7|         an entity apart from its three units, how is this possible?
34 XIV, 1 |          the One and treat these three as elements of numbers,
35 XIV, 2 |      certain quality, "not being three cubits long" not being of
36 XIV, 5 |        number only in this way, "three parts of fire and two of
37 XIV, 6 |       mixed in the proportion of three times three, but it would
38 XIV, 6 |        proportion of three times three, but it would do more good
39 XIV, 6 |        mere numbers; e.g. it is "three parts to two", not "three
40 XIV, 6 |        three parts to two", not "three times two". For in any multiplication
41 XIV, 6 |       and that because there are three concords, the double consonants
42 XIV, 6 |       double consonants also are three. They quite neglect the
43 XIV, 6 |      they say that each of these three is equal to two of the other
44 XIV, 6 |          cause is that there are three parts of the mouth and one
45 XIV, 6 |       reason that there are only three, not because the concords
46 XIV, 6 |         because the concords are three; since as a matter of fact
47 XIV, 6 |       the concords are more than three, but of double consonants