Book, Paragraph

 1 III, 3 |          3~(6) Apart from the great difficulty of stating the
 2 III, 3 |    say unity or being, or the great and the small, are elements
 3 III, 4 |    One difficulty which is as great as any has been neglected
 4 III, 4 |     when strife at last waxed great in the limbs of the~Sphere,~
 5  IV, 5 |     whether magnitudes are as great, and colours are of such
 6  IV, 7 |      will be not only half as great again, but even greater.
 7   V, 13|     such attributes. And also great and small, and greater and
 8   V, 15|       which is "many times as great" is in a numerical, but
 9   V, 15|       which is "many times as great" is in an indefinite relation
10   X, 5 |    many, and the equal to the great and the small. For if we
11   X, 5 |      intermediate between the great and the small, but no contrariety
12   X, 5 |       the two; for why of the great rather than of the small?
13   X, 5 |      is that which is neither great nor small but is naturally
14   X, 5 | naturally fitted to be either great or small; and it is opposed
15   X, 7 |     and knowable? But between great and small there is one.~(
16 XIII, 3|      sciences say and prove a great deal about them; if they
17 XIII, 7|       from this problem to so great a difference of essence.~
18 XIII, 8|       each unit come from the great and the small, equalized,
19 XIII, 8|       small, another from the great? (a) If the latter, neither
20 XIII, 8|       for in one there is the great and in another the small,
21 XIII, 8| contrary in its nature to the great. Again, how is it with the
22 XIII, 8|    units consists of both the great and the small, equalized,
23 XIII, 8|  single thing, consist of the great and the small? Or how will
24 XIII, 9|    out of the species of the "great and small"; e.g. lines from
25 XIII, 9|     which are species of the "great and small". And the originative
26 XIV, 1 |      the unequal, i.e. of the great and small, and the other
27 XIV, 1 |     is a dyad composed of the great and small, treats the unequal,
28 XIV, 1 |    treats the unequal, or the great and the small, as being
29 XIV, 1 |   elements, for some name the great and the small with the One
30 XIV, 1 |     many and few, because the great and the small are more appropriate
31 XIV, 1 |       principles, and not the great and the small, consistency
32 XIV, 1 |       more universal than the great and the small. But as it
33 XIV, 1 |     an indefinite compound of great and small, say what is very
34 XIV, 1 |    and few of number, and the great and small of magnitude-like
35 XIV, 1 |  apart from this mistake, the great and the small, and so on,
36 XIV, 1 |       there is nothing either great or small, many or few, or,
37 XIV, 1 |       its own is many or few, great or small, or relative to
38 XIV, 2 |       indefinite dyad or "the great and the small" is not a
39 XIV, 2 |    they use them and speak of great and small, many and few (
40 XIV, 3 |     If (i) it consists of the great and small, it will be the
41 XIV, 3 |       of some other small and great). And if (ii) he names some
42 XIV, 3 |     And the very elements-the great and the small-seem to cry
43 XIV, 4 |       first from unequals-the great and the small-when these
44 XIV, 4 |       of good, and there is a great profusion of goods. Again,
45 XIV, 4 |      or the unequal, i.e. the great and small, is the bad-itself. (
46 XIV, 6 |      resemblances but neglect great ones. Some say that there