Book, Paragraph

 1 III, 4 |         there is no difference of meaning between "numerically one"
 2  IV, 2 |     senses, but if it has not one meaning and its definitions cannot
 3  IV, 2 |           referred to one central meaning. And since all things are
 4  IV, 2 |       have or have not one single meaning. Probably the truth is that
 5  IV, 2 |         be related to the primary meaning (and similarly in the case
 6  IV, 4 |            not be" has a definite meaning, so that not everything
 7  IV, 4 |           Again, if "man" has one meaning, let this be "two-footed
 8  IV, 4 | two-footed animal"; by having one meaning I understand this:-if "man"
 9  IV, 4 |        say that "man" has not one meaning but several, one of which
10  IV, 4 |   impossible; for not to have one meaning is to have no meaning, and
11  IV, 4 |         one meaning is to have no meaning, and if words have no meaning
12  IV, 4 |     meaning, and if words have no meaning our reasoning with one another,
13  IV, 4 |    beginning, that the name has a meaning and has one meaning; it
14  IV, 4 |         has a meaning and has one meaning; it is impossible, then,
15  IV, 6 |           questions have the same meaning. These people demand that
16  IV, 7 |         on the necessity of their meaning something; for the form
17  IV, 8 |          but that something has a meaning, so that we must argue from
18   V, 3 |          word "element" from this meaning and apply it to that which,
19   V, 4 |     genesis of growing things-the meaning which would be suggested
20   V, 4 |             6) By an extension of meaning from this sense of "nature"
21   V, 7 |         its "when", "being" has a meaning answering to each of these.
22   V, 12|          so called by a change of meaning.-These senses of "capable"
23   V, 14|       quality.-This, then, is one meaning of quality-the differentia
24   V, 25|           it consists-the "whole" meaning either the form or that
25   V, 26|         except by an extension of meaning. To things, to which qua
26   V, 30|    Accident" has also (2) another meaning, i.e. all that attaches
27 VII, 4 |     itself is not present but its meaning is expressed, this is the
28 VII, 4 |        and a formula identical in meaning (for in that case all formulae
29 VII, 4 |     adding to and taking from the meaning of "are" (in the way in
30 VII, 4 |           and the same thing, not meaning one and the same thing,
31 VII, 4 |       ambiguity nor with a single meaning, but with reference to a
32 VII, 8 |           but the matter; for the meaning we attach to this has already
33 VII, 10|      circle" is used ambiguously, meaning both the circle, unqualified,
34 VII, 17| meaningless inquiry (for (to give meaning to the question "why") the
35 VII, 17|        But we must articulate our meaning before we begin to inquire;
36  IX, 6 |        these exists actually. Our meaning can be seen in the particular
37   X, 1 |       which is even nearer to the meaning of the word "one" while
38   X, 1 |        define it according to the meaning of the word, is a measure,
39   X, 3 |         two terms is privative in meaning, they must be contraries,
40   X, 3 |  contradictory nor correlative in meaning. And the one derives its
41   X, 3 |           the same genus (’genus’ meaning that identical thing which
42   X, 6 |          and "double" derives its meaning from "two"; therefore one
43  XI, 6 |        the measure of all things, meaning simply that that which seems
44 XIII, 4|        world (or what will be the meaning of saying that there is
45 XIV, 6 |         mathematics all have this meaning. Hence they are like coincidences.