Book, Paragraph

 1  II, 2 |        either. Further, those who speak thus destroy science; for
 2 III, 4 |         whom one might suppose to speak most consistently-Empedocles,
 3  IV, 4 |         could non-existent things speak or walk, as he does? Also
 4  IV, 4 |        will not be able either to speak or to say anything intelligible;
 5  IV, 5 |          say that in a sense they speak rightly and in a sense they
 6  IV, 5 |         and therefore, while they speak plausibly, they do not say
 7   V, 3 |    syllable). Similarly those who speak of the elements of bodies
 8   V, 12|      those who merely can walk or speak but not well or not as they
 9   V, 12|          intend, that they cannot speak or walk. So too (4) in the
10   V, 12|           for we say one lyre can speak, and another cannot speak
11   V, 12|         speak, and another cannot speak at all, if it has not a
12   V, 16|        the word to bad things, we speak of a complete scandal-monger
13   V, 20|        such a disposition.-(3) We speak of a "habit" if there is
14   V, 22|                             22~We speak of "privation" (1) if something
15   V, 26|         whole water" one does not speak of, except by an extension
16 VII, 5 |       because it is impossible to speak of snubness apart from the
17 VII, 7 |          of the house, and when I speak of substance without matter
18 VII, 12|        must not say, if we are to speak rightly, that of that which
19 VII, 17|           this is the essence (to speak abstractly), which in some
20 VIII, 2|         or something of the sort, speak of the actuality. Those
21 VIII, 2|         who combine both of these speak of the third kind of substance,
22 VIII, 6|       difficulty about unity some speak of "participation", and
23 VIII, 6|           participate; and others speak of "communion", as Lycophron
24   X, 8 |          in the sense in which we speak of the genus or family of
25 XII, 8 |        the subject; for those who speak of Ideas say the Ideas are
26 XII, 8 |       Ideas are numbers, and they speak of numbers now as unlimited,
27 XII, 10|       i.e. to reason. But all who speak of the contraries make no
28 XIII, 2|       determinant to pale that we speak of the pale man.~It has,
29 XIII, 3| attributes. Thus, then, geometers speak correctly; they talk about
30 XIII, 3|       sense a cause. But we shall speak more plainly elsewhere about
31 XIII, 6|          which the mathematicians speak of, and that which we have
32 XIII, 6|         themselves otherwise some speak of the objects of mathematics
33 XIII, 6|           Ideas exist; and others speak of the objects of mathematics,
34 XIII, 8|          way in which some others speak about numbers correct. These
35 XIII, 8|           that confront those who speak of number in the sense of "
36 XIII, 8| impossible. For it is not true to speak of indivisible spatial magnitudes;
37 XIV, 1 |           makes any difference to speak of, in view of some of the
38 XIV, 2 |    unequal. Yet they use them and speak of great and small, many
39 XIV, 2 |         proceed solids); and they speak of yet more kinds of relative
40 XIV, 3 |           lightness, they seem to speak of another heaven and other
41 XIV, 3 |  constructing a world and wish to speak the language of natural
42 XIV, 4 |        poets, however, are led to speak thus only because they think