Book, Paragraph

 1   I, 1 |           similarly in the case of Socrates and in many individual cases,
 2   I, 1 |     incidental way, but Callias or Socrates or some other called by
 3 III, 6 |          this" and a single thing, Socrates will be several animals-himself
 4  IV, 2 |           who will inquire whether Socrates and Socrates seated are
 5  IV, 2 |       inquire whether Socrates and Socrates seated are the same thing,
 6  IV, 4 |         accidental to man. But (2) Socrates is musical, not in this
 7  IV, 4 |       which white is accidental to Socrates, cannot form an infinite
 8  IV, 4 |         the upward direction; e.g. Socrates the white has not yet another
 9  IV, 4 |          musical" is accidental to Socrates; and the accident is an
10   V, 7 | affirmation and of negation; e.g. "Socrates is musical" means that this
11   V, 7 |       means that this is true, or "Socrates is not-pale" means that
12   V, 9 |        without qualification. For "Socrates" and "musical Socrates"
13   V, 9 |             Socrates" and "musical Socrates" are thought to be the same;
14   V, 9 |       thought to be the same; but "Socrates" is not predicable of more
15   V, 9 |     therefore we do not say "every Socrates" as we say "every man".~
16   V, 29|          in a sense the same, e.g. Socrates and musical Socrates (a
17   V, 29|          e.g. Socrates and musical Socrates (a false account is not
18 VII, 6 |           and the question whether Socrates and to be Socrates are the
19 VII, 6 |         whether Socrates and to be Socrates are the same thing, are
20 VII, 8 |           whole "this", Callias or Socrates, is analogous to "this brazen
21 VII, 8 |          bones, this is Callias or Socrates; and they are different
22 VII, 10|            regards the individual, Socrates already includes in him
23 VII, 11|           And the comparison which Socrates the younger used to make
24 VII, 11|            taken universally; and "Socrates" or "Coriscus", if even
25 VII, 11|     Coriscus", if even the soul of Socrates may be called Socrates,
26 VII, 11|          of Socrates may be called Socrates, has two meanings (for some
27 VII, 11|           concrete thing), but if "Socrates" or "Coriscus" means simply
28 VII, 11|   accidental unities like that of "Socrates" and "musical"; for these
29 VII, 13|        separable from it. Further, Socrates will contain a substance
30 VII, 15|          individual, like Cleon or Socrates. After all, why does not
31   X, 5 |            whether it was Cleon or Socrates that came" as this is not
32 XII, 3 |        composed of these two, e.g. Socrates or Callias. Now in some
33 XII, 8 |      applies to many things, while Socrates is one. But the primary
34 XIII, 4|            state of flux. But when Socrates was occupying himself with
35 XIII, 4|            but it was natural that Socrates should be seeking the essence,
36 XIII, 4|    starting-point of science):-but Socrates did not make the universals
37 XIII, 5|   something else, so that, whether Socrates exists or not, a man like
38 XIII, 5|          exists or not, a man like Socrates might come to be. And evidently
39 XIII, 5|           this might be so even if Socrates were eternal. And there
40 XIII, 9|           something different. And Socrates gave the impulse to this