Book, Paragraph

 1  IV, 4 |  potentially and not in complete reality that is indeterminate. But
 2  IV, 5 |        their opinions; if, then, reality is such as the view in question
 3   V, 4 |       potentially or in complete reality.~
 4   V, 7 |  potentially, others in complete reality. For we say both of that
 5   V, 11| according as potency or complete reality is taken into account, different
 6   V, 11|    others in respect of complete reality, e.g. in potency the half
 7   V, 11|       substance, but in complete reality these are posterior; for
 8   V, 11|      they will exist in complete reality.) In a sense, therefore,
 9 VII, 3 |         has little or nothing of reality. But yet one must start
10 VII, 6 |        neither is the essence of reality real, nor the essence of
11 VII, 6 |        so that if the essence of reality is not real, neither is
12 VII, 9 |     exist beforehand in complete reality another substance which
13 VII, 13|    matter underlies the complete reality. The universal also is thought
14 VII, 13|        present in it in complete reality; for things that are thus
15 VII, 13|        that are thus in complete reality two are never in complete
16 VII, 13|        two are never in complete reality one, though if they are
17 VII, 13|        present in it in complete reality. But our result involves
18 VII, 13|  substances existing in complete reality, every substance would be
19 VII, 16|        i.e. existent in complete reality as well as in potency, because
20 VIII, 3|        point; each is a complete reality and a definite nature. And (
21 VIII, 6|     between potency and complete reality. But, as has been said,
22  IX, 1 |          of potency and complete reality, and of function, let us
23  IX, 1 |          of potency and complete reality. And first let us explain
24  IX, 3 |        we connect with "complete reality", has, in the main, been
25  IX, 3 |         do not exist in complete reality.~
26  IX, 7 |       comes to exist in complete reality from having existed potentially
27  IX, 8 |       and points to the complete reality.~And while in some cases
28  XI, 9 |         in one case a particular reality, in another, characterized
29  XI, 9 |          takes when the complete reality itself exists, and neither
30  XI, 9 |          nor later. The complete reality, then, of that which exists
31  XI, 9 |       yet it is not the complete reality of bronze qua bronze that
32  XI, 9 |         definition, the complete reality of bronze would have been
33  XI, 9 |         same, it is the complete reality of the potential, and as
34  XI, 9 |          place when the complete reality itself exists, and neither
35  XI, 9 |          it must be the complete reality of both. For while a thing
36 XII, 5 |     first in respect of complete reality is the cause of all things.
37 XII, 8 |       matter; for it is complete reality. So the unmovable first
38 XIII, 3|      exists not only in complete reality but also materially.~Now
39 XIII, 8|        say), but not in complete reality; and the cause of the error
40 XIV, 5 |          the first principles of reality, so that the One itself