Book, Paragraph

 1  II, 3 |       so that as in trade so in argument some people think it mean.
 2  II, 3 |        how to take each sort of argument, since it is absurd to seek
 3 III, 4 |       follows, according to the argument of Parmenides, that all
 4 III, 5 |        and planes; for the same argument applies, since they are
 5  IV, 4 |      not observing the rules of argument.~And in general those who
 6  IV, 5 |       it is not their expressed argument but their thought that one
 7  IV, 5 |       who argue for the sake of argument can be cured only by refuting
 8  IV, 5 |      cured only by refuting the argument as expressed in speech and
 9  IV, 5 |     shall say in answer to this argument also that while there is
10  IV, 6 |       seek merely compulsion in argument seek what is impossible;
11  IV, 6 |         ask for an irresistible argument, and at the same time demand
12  IV, 6 |  difficulty but for the sake of argument, should say that this is
13  IV, 7 |  arguing merely for the sake of argument; so that it will be possible
14  IV, 7 |  arguments, they give in to the argument and agree that the conclusion
15 VII, 6 |        the former kind the same argument will be applicable.~Clearly,
16 VII, 9 |    regarding substance does our argument prove that its form does
17 VII, 9 |         not come to be, but the argument applies to all the primary
18 VII, 12|         share in them, the same argument applies, since the differentiae
19 VII, 17|       it is an element the same argument will again apply; for flesh
20 VII, 17|        case we can use the same argument as in the case of flesh
21 VIII, 1|        is in virtue of the same argument that they are thought to
22  IX, 8 |    actuality. According to this argument, then, it is obvious that
23  IX, 9 |      evident from the following argument. Everything of which we
24   X, 2 |      the triangle. And the same argument applies to all other classes.
25  XI, 5 |        then, who are to join in argument with one another must to
26  XI, 5 |         how are they to join in argument with one another? Therefore
27  XI, 8 |      proper end. And as for the argument that "when he who is musical
28  XI, 10|      evident from the following argument. If the definition of a
29  XI, 10|      evident from the following argument. The infinite can neither
30  XI, 10|  sometime become fire. The same argument applies to this as to the
31 XIII, 2|      that according to the same argument the other powers and characteristics
32 XIII, 2|       not sensible, by the same argument the planes which exist by
33 XIII, 2|         have to be, by the same argument, other lines and points;
34 XIII, 4|        them, almost by the same argument, that there must be Ideas
35 XIII, 4|  sciences, and according to the argument of the "one over many" there
36 XIII, 4| negations, and according to the argument that thought has an object
37 XIII, 5|       its composition. But this argument, which was used first by
38 XIV, 1 |  nothing contrary to substance, argument confirms this. No contrary,
39 XIV, 3 |     must therefore examine this argument too, and see whether it
40 XIV, 3 |         it is to these that the argument applied. Why then should