Book, Paragraph

 1 III, 3 |      being, or the great and the small, are elements of things,
 2  IV, 5 |       determined by the large or small number of those who hold
 3   V, 3 |        that which, being one and small, is useful for many purposes;
 4   V, 3 |         for which reason what is small and simple and indivisible
 5   V, 13|   attributes. And also great and small, and greater and smaller,
 6 VII, 3 |         often knowable to a very small extent, and has little or
 7  IX, 3 |        the same, and so it is no small thing they are seeking to
 8   X, 5 |       equal to the great and the small. For if we used the word "
 9   X, 5 |        between the great and the small, but no contrariety is either
10   X, 5 |         great rather than of the small? It is, then, the privative
11   X, 5 |       which is neither great nor small but is naturally fitted
12   X, 5 |     fitted to be either great or small; and it is opposed to both
13   X, 7 |  knowable? But between great and small there is one.~(3) If intermediates
14 XIII, 4|      touched on the subject to a small extent, and defined, after
15 XIII, 8|      come from the great and the small, equalized, or one from
16 XIII, 8|       equalized, or one from the small, another from the great? (
17 XIII, 8|         great and in another the small, which is contrary in its
18 XIII, 8|        of both the great and the small, equalized, how will the
19 XIII, 8|     consist of the great and the small? Or how will it differ from
20 XIII, 9|        species of the "great and small"; e.g. lines from the "long
21 XIII, 9|        species of the "great and small". And the originative principle
22 XIV, 1 |   unequal, i.e. of the great and small, and the other thinker we
23 XIV, 1 |        composed of the great and small, treats the unequal, or
24 XIV, 1 |    unequal, or the great and the small, as being one, and does
25 XIV, 1 |      some name the great and the small with the One and treat these
26 XIV, 1 |        because the great and the small are more appropriate in
27 XIV, 1 |        and not the great and the small, consistency requires that
28 XIV, 1 | universal than the great and the small. But as it is, they say
29 XIV, 1 | indefinite compound of great and small, say what is very far from
30 XIV, 1 |        number, and the great and small of magnitude-like even and
31 XIV, 1 |       mistake, the great and the small, and so on, must be relative
32 XIV, 1 |          nothing either great or small, many or few, or, in general,
33 XIV, 1 |         is many or few, great or small, or relative to something
34 XIV, 2 |       dyad or "the great and the small" is not a reason why there
35 XIV, 2 |      them and speak of great and small, many and few (from which
36 XIV, 3 |        consists of the great and small, it will be the same as
37 XIV, 3 |     magnitudes out of some other small and great). And if (ii)
38 XIV, 4 |      unequal, i.e. the great and small, is the bad-itself. (Hence
39 XIV, 6 |        Homeric scholars, who see small resemblances but neglect