Book, Paragraph

 1 III, 1 |        with regard to prior and posterior and all other such terms
 2 III, 3 |        distinction of prior and posterior is present, that which is
 3 III, 3 |        is not prior and another posterior. Further, where one thing
 4  IV, 2 |       the concepts "prior" and "posterior", "genus" and "species", "
 5   V, 2 |         a prior and others in a posterior sense, e.g. both "the physician"
 6   V, 11|       11~The words "prior" and "posterior" are applied (1) to some
 7   V, 11|        that which is farther is posterior.-Other things are prior
 8   V, 11|       then are called prior and posterior in this sense, others (4)
 9   V, 11|      complete reality these are posterior; for it is only when the
10   V, 11|       that are called prior and posterior are so called with reference
11 VII, 3 |         be dismissed; for it is posterior and its nature is obvious.
12 VII, 6 |        is substance. And if the posterior substances and the prior
13 VII, 10|         a thing is divided, are posterior; but those which are of
14 VII, 10|      and the body and parts are posterior to this, the essential substance,
15 VII, 10|     parts are neither prior nor posterior to the whole, i.e. those
16 VII, 10|        one sense must be called posterior to the art in one sense,
17 VII, 10|        by individual lines, are posterior to their parts); while the
18 VII, 10|       immaterial right angle is posterior to the parts included in
19 VII, 12|        to think the one element posterior and the other prior? Regarding
20  IX, 8 |     because the things that are posterior in becoming are prior in
21  IX, 9 |        the bad is in its nature posterior to the potency. And therefore
22  XI, 10|    movement or in time, but the posterior among these is called infinite
23 XII, 7 |       all the other changes are posterior to change of place.~
24 XII, 10|       least its action would be posterior to its potency. The world,
25 XIII, 2|       but in truth they must be posterior; for the incomplete spatial
26 XIII, 2|       in the order of substance posterior, as the lifeless is to the
27 XIII, 2|         If, then, that which is posterior in the order of generation
28 XIII, 2| produced by adding determinants posterior; for it is by adding a determinant
29 XIII, 7|       ranked as either prior or posterior to the numbers.~But (2)
30 XIII, 7|         thing prior and another posterior, the resultant of these
31 XIII, 7|        will be prior to one and posterior to the other. Again, since
32 XIII, 7|       they consist of prior and posterior units? All this is absurd
33 XIII, 7|        that there are prior and posterior 2 and similarly with the
34 XIII, 7|         it be prior to the 3 or posterior? It rather seems that it
35 XIII, 8|      time prior to 2; and again posterior, 2 being treated as a whole,
36 XIII, 9|        to the classes of things posterior to number,-the line, the
37 XIV, 1 |     entity or substance, and is posterior to quality and quantity;
38 XIV, 1 |      for all the categories are posterior to substance. Again, (d)
39 XIV, 3 |       another, the prior to the posterior; for if number did not exist,