Book, Paragraph

 1 III, 5 |     these it cannot be right to call beings.~But if this is admitted,
 2 III, 6 |        are universal or what we call individuals. If they are
 3  IV, 4 |          just as if one whom we call "man", others were to call "
 4  IV, 4 |      call "man", others were to call "not-man"; but the point
 5   V, 2 |        no difference whether we call it good or apparent good.~
 6   V, 3 |      sort are one or more, they call these elements. The so-called
 7   V, 4 |         in this way that people call the elements of natural
 8   V, 5 |                            5~We call "necessary" (1) (a) that
 9   V, 6 |        bent and has an angle we call both one and not one, because
10   V, 6 |        one.~While in a sense we call anything one if it is a
11   V, 6 |   together anyhow we should not call them one all the same (unless
12   V, 8 |                            8~We call "substance" (1) the simple
13   V, 12|    patient suffers anything, we call it "capable" of suffering;
14   V, 12|       senses in which we should call a boy and a man and a eunuch "
15   V, 16|  complete thief; indeed we even call them good, i.e. a good thief
16   V, 22|     easily or not well (e.g. we call a thing uncuttable not only
17   V, 28|        the substratum, which we call matter.~Those things are
18   V, 29|    which they produce in us. We call things false in this way,
19   V, 30|       necessity nor usually, we call it an accident. Therefore
20  VI, 1 |        physics, and what we may call theology, since it is obvious
21  VI, 2 |       nor for the most part, we call accidental. For instance,
22 VII, 7 |      they come to be is what we call matter; and that by which
23 VII, 7 |        its substratum, which we call its matter (e.g. what becomes
24 VII, 8 |        by something (and this I call the starting-point of the
25 VII, 8 |         or whatever we ought to call the shape present in the
26 VII, 12|         the formula of which we call a definition, as for instance,
27  IX, 6 |        be separated out, and we call even the man who is not
28  IX, 6 |        processes, then, we must call the one set movements, and
29  IX, 6 |        sort of process, then, I call an actuality, and the former
30  IX, 7 |           It seems that when we call a thing not something else
31   X, 1 |        also, and perception, we call the measure of things for
32   X, 3 |     numerically"; again, (2) we call a thing the same if it is
33   X, 4 | greatest difference, and this I call contrariety. That contrariety
34   X, 7 |        which they stand. For we call those things intermediates,
35  XI, 9 |      and the completely real, I call the actuality of the potential
36  XI, 9 |      from what people say. Some call it otherness and inequality
37  XI, 12|    species of the contiguous. I call two things continuous when
38 XIII, 4|         it is as if one were to call both Callias and a piece
39 XIV, 1 |       the principles which they call elements, for some name