Book, Paragraph

 1 III, 4 |  identity, and in so far as some attribute belongs to them universally.~
 2  IV, 1 |        being and investigate the attribute of this part; this is what
 3  IV, 3 |        say. It is, that the same attribute cannot at the same time
 4  IV, 4 |         or the negation of every attribute. For it is absurd if of
 5  IV, 7 |         which the negation of an attribute involves the assertion of
 6   V, 7 |        thing; the first that the attribute is an accident of that which
 7   V, 7 |        because that to which the attribute belongs is, or because the
 8   V, 7 |          subject which has as an attribute that of which it is itself
 9   V, 11|        smoothness; for one is an attribute of a line as such, and the
10   V, 18|     which it is the nature of an attribute to be found, e.g. colour
11   V, 18|  particular animal.-(3) Whatever attribute a thing receives in itself
12   V, 22|          would naturally have an attribute, it has it not; e.g. a blind
13   V, 22|         would naturally have the attribute, and when it would naturally
14   V, 22|          thing has little of the attribute (and this means having it
15   V, 22|        or because it has not the attribute at all; for it is not the
16   V, 29|         the thing itself with an attribute are in a sense the same,
17 VII, 4 |        something is; but when an attribute is asserted of a subject
18 VII, 4 |      subject participates in the attribute and has it as an affection,
19 VII, 4 |       its meaning-viz. that this attribute belongs to this subject;
20 VII, 5 |   accident that the nose has the attribute either of concavity or of
21 VII, 5 |        subject of the particular attribute, and which cannot be explained
22 VII, 5 |          thing of which it is an attribute propter se, for snubness
23 VII, 6 |        but it is the same as the attribute white.)~The absurdity of
24 VII, 12|      subject, man, has a certain attribute; for then a unity is produced
25 VII, 13|          plain that no universal attribute is a substance, and this
26  IX, 10|     truth if the subject and the attribute are really combined, and
27  IX, 10|       such a class has a certain attribute and another has not; e.g.
28  IX, 10|         that one instance has an attribute and another has not, but
29   X, 1 |           means that it has this attribute, that there is something
30   X, 4 |         incapable of having some attribute or that which, being of
31  XI, 4 |         as each of them has some attribute or other, but speculates
32  XI, 10| themselvess-since infinity is an attribute of these? Further, if the
33 XII, 6 |          thing as movement or an attribute of movement. And there is
34 XIII, 3|      then considered whether any attribute belongs to a man qua indivisible.
35 XIII, 8|        differ in quality. For no attribute can attach to them; for
36 XIV, 1 |          principle and yet be an attribute of something else. To suggest
37 XIV, 3 |  doubling.~It is strange also to attribute generation to things that
38 XIV, 3 |         whether the Pythagoreans attribute generation to them or not;
39 XIV, 4 |        the first principle as an attribute, but from their making the