Book, Paragraph

 1   V, 7 |          is a man", or "he who is pale is musical" or "the musician
 2   V, 7 |      musical" or "the musician is pale", the last two mean that
 3   V, 9 |       accidental sense, e.g. "the pale" and "the musical" are the
 4   V, 30|        And a musical man might be pale; but since this does not
 5  VI, 2 |         an accident that a man is pale (for this is neither always
 6  VI, 2 |        must exist; for instance a pale man is not always nor for
 7 VII, 12|         in the case of "man" and "pale" there is a plurality when
 8 VII, 12|         produced and we have "the pale man". In the present case,
 9 VII, 15|         animal which is lean" or "pale", or something else which
10 VIII, 5|           different senses that a pale man comes from a dark man,
11 VIII, 5|        comes from a dark man, and pale comes from dark. Nor has
12  IX, 7 |     modification is "musical" or "pale". (The subject is called,
13  IX, 7 |        man is not "paleness" but "pale", and not "ambulation" or "
14  IX, 10|          think truly that you are pale, that you are pale, but
15  IX, 10|        you are pale, that you are pale, but because you are pale
16  IX, 10|         pale, but because you are pale we who say this have the
17   X, 9 | difference in species between the pale man and the dark man, not
18   X, 9 |          definition + matter, the pale man, then, is so also, because
19   X, 9 |        individual Callias that is pale; man, then, is pale only
20   X, 9 |       that is pale; man, then, is pale only incidentally. Neither
21   X, 9 |          contrariety also between pale man and dark horse, and
22   X, 9 |       since even if both had been pale, yet they would have been
23   X, 10|           form, just as not every pale thing is different in form
24   X, 10|   universal (e.g. man can be both pale and dark), and if it is
25   X, 10|      though not at the same time, pale and dark. Yet pale is contrary
26   X, 10|          time, pale and dark. Yet pale is contrary to dark.~But
27  XI, 12|           because he changes from pale to dark,-so that on this
28 XIII, 2|  substances (e.g. a "mobile" or a pale’), pale is prior to the
29 XIII, 2|           a "mobile" or a pale’), pale is prior to the pale man
30 XIII, 2|              pale is prior to the pale man in definition, but not
31 XIII, 2|         concrete thing I mean the pale man. Therefore it is plain
32 XIII, 2|           adding a determinant to pale that we speak of the pale
33 XIII, 2|         pale that we speak of the pale man.~It has, then, been
34 XIII, 3|          to it (e.g. not with the pale, if the healthy thing is
35 XIII, 3|           if the healthy thing is pale, and the science has the
36 XIII, 7|         sharing in the other, as "pale man" is different from "
37 XIII, 7|           man" is different from "pale" and "man" (for it shares
38 XIV, 1 |         the things are "man" and "pale" and "walking", these will