Book, Paragraph

 1 III, 1  |          kind, both those in the definitions and those in the substratum;
 2 III, 3  | principles or starting-points of definitions, the genera must also be
 3  IV, 2  |          not one meaning and its definitions cannot be referred to one
 4  IV, 4  |      might be also several other definitions if only they were limited
 5  IV, 4  |          assigned to each of the definitions. If, however, they were
 6   V, 6  |         kind, others because the definitions which state their essence
 7   V, 9  |          or their matters or the definitions of their essence are more
 8   V, 10 |        so are those things whose definitions differ in the infima species
 9   V, 10 |  indivisible in genus, but their definitions are different), and those
10   V, 28 |       differentiae. Again (4) in definitions the first constituent element,
11 VII, 4  |        or sets of words would be definitions; for there will be some
12 VII, 11 |       then, that the question of definitions contains some difficulty,
13 VII, 11 |        other. And in the case of definitions, how the elements in the
14 VII, 12 |         must first inquire about definitions reached by the method of
15 VII, 12 |     things more than once in our definitions; for it is superfluous.
16 VII, 12 |         change the order of such definitions, e.g. of that of man, saying "
17 VII, 12 |       other prior? Regarding the definitions, then, which are reached
18 VIII, 2 |   actuality itself, in all other definitions also it is what most resembles
19 VIII, 2 |      same is true of the kind of definitions which Archytas used to accept;
20 VIII, 6 |      stated with respect both to definitions and to numbers, what is
21 VIII, 6 |         one" is present in their definitions), and the essence of each
22  IX, 1  |          of change. In all these definitions is implied the formula if
23   X, 4  |          other commonly accepted definitions of contraries are also necessarily
24   X, 9  |    matter is included with their definitions? Doubtless because there
25  XI, 6  |         evident if we reduce the definitions of contraries to their principle.~
26 XII, 3  |       but causes in the sense of definitions are simultaneous with their
27 XIII, 2 |        definition to those whose definitions are compounded out of their
28 XIII, 2 |          compounded out of their definitions; and these two properties
29 XIII, 3 |       are their results or their definitions, it is not true to say that
30 XIII, 4 |       make the universals or the definitions exist apart: they, however,
31 XIII, 4 |        other respects the common definitions apply to the Forms, e.g.
32 XIII, 8 |       and from that of universal definitions, so that (1) from the former
33 XIII, 9 |     discussion, by reason of his definitions, but he did not separate
34 XIII, 10|          demonstrations and from definitions; for we do not conclude