Book, Paragraph

 1  IV, 2 |       be, but all refer to one starting-point; some things are said to
 2  IV, 2 |  concepts and reason from this starting-point.—Obviously then it is the
 3  IV, 3 |      for this is naturally the starting-point even for all the other axioms.~
 4  IV, 4 |         not demonstration. The starting-point for all such arguments is
 5  IV, 6 |    everything; for they seek a starting-point, and they seek to get this
 6  IV, 6 |   reason can be given; for the starting-point of demonstration is not
 7  IV, 7 |        for everything. And the starting-point in dealing with all such
 8  VI, 2 |        And we must take as our starting-point the question whether there
 9  VI, 3 | process goes back to a certain starting-point, but this no longer points
10  VI, 3 | further. This then will be the starting-point for the fortuitous, and
11  VI, 3 |        be. But to what sort of starting-point and what sort of cause we
12 VII, 7 |        which proceeds from the starting-point and the form is thinking,
13 VII, 7 |      by art, as in healing the starting-point is perhaps the production
14 VII, 8 | something (and this I call the starting-point of the production), and
15 VII, 9 |   syllogisms, substance is the starting-point of everything. It is from "
16 VII, 17|       taking once more another starting-point; for perhaps from this we
17 VII, 17|     let us pursue it from this starting-point. The "why" is always sought
18 VIII, 4|      the same matter serves as starting-point for their generation, yet
19   X, 1 |  itself; and so the one is the starting-point of number qua number. And
20   X, 1 |   these, then, the measure and starting-point is something one and indivisible,
21   X, 1 |       one" of this sort is the starting-point and measure (for they assume
22 XII, 7 |        for the thinking is the starting-point. And thought is moved by
23 XIII, 4|        what a thing is" is the starting-point of syllogisms; for there
24 XIII, 4|   which are concerned with the starting-point of science):-but Socrates
25 XIII, 8|        and the 1-itself is the starting-point of them. It is paradoxical
26 XIII, 8|        exist, the 1 is not the starting-point (for this sort of 1 must
27 XIII, 8|  numbers). But if the 1 is the starting-point, the truth about the numbers
28 XIII, 8|       later. How then is 1 the starting-point? Because it is not divisiable,
29 XIII, 8|      which way, then, is 1 the starting-point? As has been said, the right
30 XIII, 8|    Accordingly they make 1 the starting-point in both ways. But this is
31 XIII, 8|        s except that it is the starting-point), and the 2 is divisible