Book, Paragraph

 1  IV, 7 |    which is neither man nor horse is between man and horse. (
 2  IV, 7 |    horse is between man and horse. (a) If it were of the latter
 3   V, 6 |   differentiae is one (e.g. horse, man, and dog form a unity,
 4   V, 10|     the genus (e.g. man and horse are indivisible in genus,
 5   V, 14|   he is two-footed, and the horse is so because it is four-footed;
 6   V, 26|   by all of them, e.g. man, horse, god, being severally one
 7 VII, 6 |      e.g. to the essence of horse there will belong a second
 8 VII, 8 |   production of a mule by a horse. (And even these cases are
 9 VII, 8 |    be found to be common to horse and ass, the genus next
10 VII, 10|   this quality. But man and horse and terms which are thus
11 VII, 13|    be present in "man" and "horse". Then clearly it is a formula
12 VII, 14|    is present in "man" and "horse", it is either one and the
13 VII, 14|     if the "animal" in "the horse" and in "man" is one and
14   X, 8 |   other another, e.g. one a horse and the other a man. This
15   X, 9 |    it does? For why is this horse other than this man in species,
16   X, 9 |   between pale man and dark horse, and it is a contrariety
17  XI, 1 | there is not a third man or horse besides the ideal and the
18  XI, 5 |     saying the man is not a horse one would be either more
19  XI, 5 |   that the same person is a horse; for it was assumed to be
20  XI, 5 |  same person is a man and a horse, or any other animal.~While,
21 XIII, 7|     the bad, or a man and a horse; but those who hold these
22 XIII, 8| Idea of something, e.g. of "horse" or of "white", man will
23 XIII, 8|       man will be a part of horse, if man is It is paradoxical
24 XIV, 1 |     horses, the measure is "horse", and if they are men, "
25 XIV, 1 |  man". If they are a man, a horse, and a god, the measure
26 XIV, 5 |   one of man and another of horse), viz. by imitating the