Book, Paragraph

 1 III, 1 |    whether the principles are limited in number or in kind, both
 2 III, 4 |      of articulate sound were limited in number; all the language
 3 III, 6 |    first principles cannot be limited in number (just as the elements
 4 III, 6 |   this sensible world are not limited in number, but in kind,
 5 III, 6 |  sound-whose elements will be limited even in number; so is it
 6  IV, 4 |    meanings, if only they are limited in number; for to each definition
 7  IV, 4 | definitions if only they were limited in number; for a peculiar
 8  IV, 4 |        however, they were not limited but one were to say that
 9   V, 13|     in three depth. Of these, limited plurality is number, limited
10   V, 13|  limited plurality is number, limited length is a line, breadth
11   V, 26|    But (b) the continuous and limited is a whole, when it is a
12  VI, 3 |  constantly subtracted from a limited extent of time, one will
13 VII, 1 |    and that some assert to be limited in number, others unlimited.
14 VII, 4 |  sense to substance, but in a limited sense to the other categories.
15  IX, 8 |      not theorize except in a limited sense, or because they have
16   X, 5 |       predicated are in a way limited; for they must be either
17  XI, 8 |     we subtract time from the limited time between now and to-morrow
18  XI, 10| traverse, is not traversed or limited; further, a thing may be
19  XI, 10|        since the elements are limited in multitude. For the contraries
20  XI, 10|  finite, the All also must be limited.~In general, there cannot
21 XII, 8 |      now as unlimited, now as limited by the number 10; but as
22 XIV, 3 |   began to be constrained and limited by the limit. But since