Book, Paragraph

 1  IV, 2 |          things, as there is one perception, so there is one science,
 2  IV, 6 | relative-relative to opinion and perception, so that nothing either
 3   V, 11|         are prior in relation to perception. For in definition universals
 4   V, 11|        are prior, in relation to perception individuals. And in definition
 5   V, 15|           and the perceptible to perception.~(1) Relative terms of the
 6 VII, 10|      cannot belong to it without perception), so that the parts of soul
 7 VII, 10|         intuitive thinking or of perception; and when they pass out
 8 VII, 15|        they have passed from our perception; and though the formulae
 9  IX, 3 |           nothing will even have perception if it is not perceiving,
10  IX, 3 |  perceiving, i.e. exercising its perception. If, then, that is blind
11   X, 1 |        from which, as far as our perception goes, nothing can be subtracted,
12   X, 1 |    things which are undivided to perception, as has been said already-only
13   X, 1 |        been said already-only to perception, for doubtless every continuous
14   X, 1 |     units.)~Knowledge, also, and perception, we call the measure of
15   X, 1 |       respectively knowledge and perception, which we say are the measures
16   X, 3 |     because of the conditions of perception.~To the one belong, as we
17  XI, 7 |      Some get the "what" through perception, others by hypothesis; so
18 XII, 7 |          this reason are waking, perception, and thinking most pleasant,
19 XII, 9 |          evidently knowledge and perception and opinion and understanding
20 XIII, 6|      separable but in objects of perception (not however in the way
21 XIII, 6|        the sense that objects of perception consists of numbers which