Book, Paragraph

 1  IV, 2 |      reason that we say even of non-being that it is nonbeing. As,
 2  IV, 2 |      are reducible to being and non-being, and to unity and plurality,
 3  IV, 4 |         they are speaking about non-being; for it is that which exists
 4  IV, 4 |     indisputable belief; and if non-being is something indisputable
 5  IV, 5 |         is being, and the other non-being. To those, then, whose belief
 6  VI, 2 |          and another the true (’non-being’ being the false), while
 7  VI, 2 | accidental is obviously akin to non-being. And this is clear also
 8  IX, 10|       10~The terms "being" and "non-being" are employed firstly with
 9  IX, 10|       answers to truth and the "non-being" that answers to falsity,
10  XI, 8 |      sophist spends his time on non-being.~That a science of the accidental
11 XII, 2 |      question from what sort of non-being generation proceeds; for "
12 XII, 2 |       generation proceeds; for "non-being" has three senses. If, then,
13 XII, 2 |   senses. If, then, one form of non-being exists potentially, still
14 XII, 7 |     things together" and out of non-being, these difficulties may
15 XIV, 2 |         the things that are, if non-being is to be supposed not to
16 XIV, 2 |       Secondly, of what sort of non-being and being do the things
17 XIV, 2 |          What sort of being and non-being, then, by their union pluralize
18 XIV, 2 |       This thinker means by the non-being the union of which with
19 XIV, 2 |       the inference), nor is it non-being in this sense that the things
20 XIV, 2 |       resolved into. But since "non-being" taken in its various cases