Book, Paragraph

 1   I, 1  |        knowledge of individuals, art of universals, and actions and productions
 2 III, 3  |           admits of dispute. For if the universals are always more of the nature
 3 III, 4  |          follows that none of the other universals is a substance; for these
 4 III, 6  |                then, the principles are universals, these universal. Therefore
 5 III, 6  |                 follow; if they are not universals but of knowledge of the
 6   V, 11 |           perception. For in definition universals are prior, in relation to
 7 VII, 13 |                substance can consist of universals because a universal indicates
 8  XI, 1  |             seek should treat rather of universals; for every definition and
 9  XI, 1  |                 and every science is of universals and not of infimae species,
10  XI, 2  |                that all knowledge is of universals and of the "such", but substance
11 XII, 1  |                present day tend to rank universals as substances (for genera
12 XII, 1  |              substances (for genera are universals, and these they tend to
13 XIII, 4 |               Socrates did not make the universals or the definitions exist
14 XIII, 9 | species-of-a-genus, when one posits the universals, viz. whether it is animal-itself
15 XIII, 9 |                 but he did not separate universals from individuals; and in
16 XIII, 9 |                so that it followed that universals and individuals were almost
17 XIII, 10|          universal, and knowledge is of universals. This is clear from demonstrations