Book, Paragraph

 1  IV, 7 |     in the first place, if we define what the true and the false
 2  VI, 1 |    clear how we must seek and define the "what" in the case of
 3 VII, 4 |   white man", and one were to define cloak as white; white man
 4 VII, 10|       kind (at least we shall define each part, if we define
 5 VII, 10|       define each part, if we define it well, not without reference
 6 VII, 11|   plain it is not possible to define any thing; for definition
 7 VII, 11|       that it is not right to define these by reference to lines
 8 VII, 11|     and it is not possible to define it without reference to
 9 VII, 15|     for it is not possible to define such things.~Nor is it possible
10 VII, 15| things.~Nor is it possible to define any Idea. For the Idea is,
11 VIII, 2|  actuality. E.g. if we had to define a threshold, we should say "
12 VIII, 2|         and a house we should define as "bricks and timbers in
13 VIII, 2|      cases), and if we had to define ice we should say "water
14 VIII, 2|       for defining, those who define a house as stones, bricks,
15   X, 1 |    the strictest sense, if we define it according to the meaning
16  XI, 7 |    natural philosopher should define things and how he should
17  XI, 9 |   fact that it is not easy to define it otherwise. For firstly