Book, Paragraph

 1   I, 1 |     have a judgement that when Callias was ill of this disease
 2   I, 1 |      in an incidental way, but Callias or Socrates or some other
 3   V, 18|    essence of each thing, e.g. Callias is in virtue of himself
 4   V, 18|        is in virtue of himself Callias and what it was to be Callias;-(
 5   V, 18|  Callias and what it was to be Callias;-(2) whatever is present
 6   V, 18|    present in the "what", e.g. Callias is in virtue of himself
 7   V, 18|     present in his definition; Callias is a particular animal.-(
 8 VII, 5 |        it as whiteness does to Callias, or to man (because Callias,
 9 VII, 5 |    Callias, or to man (because Callias, who happens to be a man,
10 VII, 8 |          And the whole "this", Callias or Socrates, is analogous
11 VII, 8 |        in these bones, this is Callias or Socrates; and they are
12 VII, 10|       the ball into bronze and Callias into flesh and bones, and
13 VII, 11| substance, e.g. a snub nose or Callias, the matter also will be
14   X, 9 |     ultimate indivisible kind. Callias is definition + matter,
15   X, 9 |   because it is the individual Callias that is pale; man, then,
16 XII, 3 |    these two, e.g. Socrates or Callias. Now in some cases the "
17 XIII, 4|       if one were to call both Callias and a piece of wood a "man",