Book, Paragraph

 1   V, 22|       either because it has no feet at all or because it has
 2   V, 22|       because it has imperfect feet. Again, a privative term
 3 VII, 12|        many, e.g. endowed with feet, two-footed, featherless.
 4 VII, 12| diferentia; e.g. "endowed with feet" is a differentia of "animal";
 5 VII, 12|        of "animal endowed with feet" must be of it qua endowed
 6 VII, 12|      be of it qua endowed with feet. Therefore we must not say,
 7 VII, 12|     that which is endowed with feet one part has feathers and
 8 VII, 12|        of animals endowed with feet will be equal in number
 9 VII, 12|       say "animal endowed with feet and two-footed" we have
10 VII, 12|      other than "animal having feet, having two feet"; and if
11 VII, 12|        having feet, having two feet"; and if we divide this
12 VII, 12|     that which is endowed with feet into the white and the black,
13 VII, 12|    two-footed and endowed with feet"; for "endowed with feet"
14 VII, 12|       feet"; for "endowed with feet" is superfluous when "two-footed"
15 VII, 14|     two-footed or possessed of feet? But perhaps the two things
16   X, 9 |   another does not, e.g. "with feet" and "with wings" do, but