Book, Paragraph

 1 III, 1 |        heard all the contending arguments, as if they were the parties
 2 III, 3 |     nature.~To judge from these arguments, then, the principles of
 3  IV, 4 |     starting-point for all such arguments is not the demand that our
 4  IV, 5 |   infinitum.-But, leaving these arguments, let us insist on this,
 5  IV, 7 |         cannot refute eristical arguments, they give in to the argument
 6  VI, 2 |      that which is not. For the arguments of the sophists deal, we
 7  VI, 2 |      musical, and all the other arguments of this sort; the accidental
 8  VI, 2 |         this is clear also from arguments such as the following: things
 9 VII, 6 |         both from the preceding arguments and because to know each
10 VIII, 1|       substances. But there are arguments which lead to the conclusion
11  XI, 6 | manifest, therefore, from these arguments that contradictory statements
12 XIII, 4|  ascribed to Socrates-inductive arguments and universal definition,
13 XIII, 4|     Forms. For according to the arguments from the sciences there
14 XIII, 4|     Again, of the most accurate arguments, some lead to Ideas of relations,
15 XIII, 4|        man".~And in general the arguments for the Forms destroy things
16 XIII, 5|      more abstract and accurate arguments, to collect many objections