Book, Paragraph

 1 III, 4 |     impossible.~Further, if we admit in the fullest sense that
 2   V, 5 |      simple; for this does not admit of more states than one,
 3   V, 6 |       called one, even if they admit of being bent, and still
 4   V, 6 |       those things that do not admit of division are called one
 5   V, 6 |       in so far as they do not admit of it; e.g. if two things
 6   V, 24|      so described because they admit of change into one another,
 7   V, 26|      does, wholes. Those which admit of both descriptions are
 8 VIII, 3|     And (4) as number does not admit of the more and the less,
 9   X, 4 | intermediate, while contraries admit of one, clearly contradiction
10   X, 4 |   while contradiction does not admit of an intermediate, privation
11   X, 7 |             7~Since contraries admit of an intermediate and in
12   X, 7 |     opposites, contradictories admit of no middle term; for this
13  XI, 5 |    same time be and not be, or admit any other similar pair of
14  XI, 11|      generated; for even if we admit to the full that its generation
15 XIII, 7|   destructive, since they will admit that this question itself
16 XIII, 8|  himself. And (2) he must also admit all the consequences that