Book, Paragraph

 1  IV, 3 |        anything about their truth or falsity,-neither the geometer nor
 2  IV, 8 |    definition, viz. by assuming what falsity or truth means. If that
 3  IV, 8 |            to postulate the truth or falsity of an infinite number of
 4   V, 12|        because such a statement is a falsity of which the contrary is
 5  VI, 4 |            separation, and truth and falsity together depend on the allocation
 6  VI, 4 |            they become a unity); for falsity and truth are not in things-it
 7  VI, 4 |          simple concepts and "whats" falsity and truth do not exist even
 8  IX, 10|              what is called truth or falsity present, and when is it
 9  IX, 10|              not being, and truth or falsity? A thing of this sort is
10  IX, 10| incommensurable"; nor will truth and falsity be still present in the
11  IX, 10|           the same; but (a) truth or falsity is as follows—contact and
12  IX, 10|           non-being" that answers to falsity, in one case there is truth
13  IX, 10|             are really combined, and falsity if they are not combined;
14  IX, 10|           knowing these objects, and falsity does not exist, nor error,
15 XIV, 2 |           false and the character of falsity. This is also why it used